Comment

Current Anthropology

Volumn 52, Issue SUPPL. 3, 2011, Pages

  Conley, John M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79953148953     PISSN: 00113204     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/657241     Document Type: Note

References (42)

1. Alston, Philip. 2005. Richard Lillich memorial lecture: promoting the accountability of members of the new UN Human Rights Council. Journal of Transnational Law and Policy 15:49-96.
2. Bloom, Shelah S. 2008. Violence against women and girls: a compendium of monitoring and evaluation indicators. Washington, DC: U.S. Agency for International Development.
3. Checker, Melissa, David Vine, and Alaka Wall. 2010. A sea change in anthropology? public anthropology reviews. American Anthropologist 112:5-6. [JMC]
4. Cohn, Bernard S. 1996. Colonialism and its forms of knowledge: the British in India. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
5. Conley, John M., and Cynthia A. Williams. 2008. The corporate social responsibility movement as an ethnographic problem. UNC Legal Studies Research Paper no. 1285631, available at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract- idp1285631.
6. Davis, Kevin. 2004. What can the rule of law variable tell us about rule of law reforms? Michigan Journal of International Law 26:141-161.
7. Davis, Kevin E., and Michael B. Kruse. 2007. Taking the measure of law: the case of the Doing Business project. Law and Social Inquiry 32(4):1095-1120.
8. Dirks, Nicholas B. 2001. Castes of mind: colonialism and the making of modern India. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
9. Ferguson, James. 2005. Seeing like an oil company: space, security, and global capital in neoliberal Africa. American Anthropologist 107:377-382. [JMC] (Pubitemid 41421362)
10. Filmer-Wilson, Emilie. 2005. Summary report of material collated regarding practical guidance to implementing rights-based approaches, human rights analyses for poverty reduction and human rights benchmarks from development actors and other relevant communities. Report prepared for the Department for International Development, London, March 31, 2005. http://www.gsdrc.org/go/display/document/legacyid/1554 (accessed December 19, 2008).
11. Foucault, Michel. 1991. Governmentality. In The Foucault effect: studies in governmentality. Graham Burchell, Colin Gordon, and Peter Miller, eds. Pp. 87-105. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
12. Goonesekere, Savatri. 2004. Introduction: indicators for monitoring implementation of CEDAW. In CEDAW indicators for South Asia: an initiative. UNIFEM South Asia Regional Office, New Delhi, India, and Centre for Women's Research, Colombo, Sri Lanka. Pp. 7-13. New Delhi: UNIFEM South Asia Regional Office.
13. Green, Maria. 2001. What we talk about when we talk about indicators: current approaches to human rights measurement. Human Rights Quarterly 23:1062-1097. (Pubitemid 33102535)
14. Kaufmann, Daniel, and Aart Kraay. 2007. Governance indicators: where are we, where should we be going? Policy Research Working Paper 4370. Washington, DC: World Bank.
15. Kipnis, Andrew B. 2008. Audit cultures: neoliberal governmentality, socialist legacy, or technologies of governing? American Ethnologist 35(2):275-289.
16. Latour, Bruno. 1987. Science in action: how to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
17. Malhotra, Rajeev, and Nicolas Fasel. 2005. Quantitative human rights indicators: a survey of major initiatives. Background paper for the UN Expert Meeting on Human Rights Indicators, Turku. http://www.jus.uio/forskning/grupper/ humrdev/Project-Indicators/Workshop06/Background/Malhotra&Fasel.pdf (accessed December 17, 2008).
18. Maurer, Bill. 2005. Mutual life, limited: Islamic banking, alternative currencies, lateral reason. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
19. O'Malley, Pat. 1999. Governmentality and the risk society. Economy and Society 28:138-148.
20. Oppenheim, Robert M. 2010. Revisiting Hrdlicka and Boas: asymmetries of race and anti-imperialism in interwar anthropology. American Anthropologist 112(1):92-103.
21. Poovey, Mary. 1998. A history of the modern fact: problems of knowledge in the sciences of wealth and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
22. Porter, Theodore M. 1995. Trust in numbers: the pursuit of objectivity in science and public life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
23. Power, Michael. 1999. The audit society: rituals of verification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
24. Randeria, Shalini. 2006. Entangled histories of uneven modernities: civil society, caste solidarities and legal pluralism in post-colonial India. In Civil society: Berlin perspectives. John Keane, ed. Pp. 213-242. New York: Berghahn.
25. Rose, Nikolas. 1989. Governing the soul: the shaping of the private self. London: Routledge.
26. ---. 1996. The death of the social? re-figuring the territory of government. Economy and Society 25:327-356.
27. ---. 1999. Predicaments of freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28. Rosga, AnnJanette, and Margaret L. Satterthwaite. 2008. The trust in indicators: measuring human rights. New York University School of Law, Public Law Research Paper no. 08-59. New York: Institute for International Law and Justice, New York University School of Law.
29. Rottenburg, Richard. 2009. Far-fetched facts: a parable of development aid. Allison Brown and Tom Lampert, trans. Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
30. Schane, Sanford A. 1987. The corporation is a person: the language of a legal fiction. Tulane Law Review 61:563-609. [JMC]
31. Schweber, Libby. 2006. Disciplining statistics: demography and vital statistics in France and England, 1830-1885. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
32. Sen, Amartya K. 1999. Development as freedom. New York: Anchor.
33. Shore, Chris, and Susan Wright. 2000. Coercive accountability: the rise of audit culture in higher education. In Audit cultures. Marilyn Strathern, ed. Pp. 57-90. London: Routledge.
34. Slaughter, Anne-Marie. 2003. Global government networks, global information agencies, and disaggregated democracy. Michigan Journal of International Law 24:1041-1094. [JMC]
35. Stocking, George W., Jr. 1984. Radcliffe-Brown and British social anthropology. In Functionalism historicized. George W. Stocking, ed. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press. [JMC]
36. Strathern, Marilyn, ed. 2000. Audit cultures: anthropological studies in accountability, ethics, and the academy. London: Routledge.
37. Turku Report. 2005. Report of Turku Expert Meeting on human rights indicators. Turku/Abo, Finland, March 10-13, 2005. http://web.abo.fi/institut/ imr/research/seminars/indicators/Report.doc(accessed December 17, 2008).
38. UNDP (United Nations Development Programme). 2000. Using indicators for human rights accountability. In Human development report 2000. Pp. 89-111. New York: Oxford University Press and UNDP.
39. UNGC (United Nations Global Compact). 2006. Making the connection: the GRI guidelines and the UNGC communication on progress. UN Global Compact and Global Reporting Initiative. Drafted 2006. http://www.globalcompact.org (accessed August 21, 2009).
40. ---. 2008. The practical guide to the United Nations Global Compact Communications on Progress (COP). http://www.unglobalcompact.org/docs/ communication-on-progress/Tools-and-Publications/Practical-Guide-2008.pdf (accessed August 21,2009).
41. von Bogdandy, Armin, and Matthais Goldmann. 2009. The exercise of public authority through national policy assessment. IILJWorking Paper 2009/2, Global Administrative Law Series (finalized 03/24/2009). New York: Institute for International Law and Justice, New York University School of Law.
42. Welker, Marina, and David Wood. 2011. Shareholder activism and alienation. Current Anthropology 52(suppl. 3):S3-S16.