High-order numerical simulations of flow-induced noise

International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids

Volumn 66, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 17-37

  Zhu, Wei Jun ^a   Shen, Wen Zhong ^a   Sørensen, Jens Nørkær ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF DENMARK   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Computational aeroacoustics; Flow acoustics splitting method; High order schemes

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC EQUATION; ACOUSTIC PERTURBATION EQUATIONS; ACOUSTIC PROBLEMS; AEROACOUSTIC PROBLEMS; COMPACT FINITE DIFFERENCES; DISPERSION ERROR; DISPERSION-RELATION-PRESERVING; FINITE VOLUME CODE; FLOW QUANTITIES; FLOW-GENERATED NOISE; HIGH-ORDER; HIGH-ORDER FINITE DIFFERENCES; HIGH-ORDER SCHEME; INDUCED NOISE; NUMERICAL SIMULATION; RUNGE-KUTTA; SECOND ORDERS; SPATIAL DISCRETIZATIONS; SPLITTING METHOD; TIME INTEGRATION; VISCOUS INCOMPRESSIBLE FLOWS;

ACOUSTIC FIELDS; AIRFOILS; ARCHITECTURAL ACOUSTICS; BENCHMARKING; COMPUTATIONAL AEROACOUSTICS; INCOMPRESSIBLE FLOW; RUNGE KUTTA METHODS;

ACOUSTIC NOISE;

EID: 79953142339     PISSN: 02712091     EISSN: 10970363     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/fld.2241     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Lighthill MJ. On sound generated aerodynamically: I. General theory. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series A 1952; 211:564.
2. Curle N. The influence of solid boundaries upon aerodynamic sound. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series A 1955; 231:505.
3. Williams Ffowcs JE, Hawkings DL. Sound generation by turbulence and surfaces in arbitrary motion. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series A 1969; 264:321.
4. Colonius T, Lele SK, Moin P. Sound generation in a mixing layer. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 1997; 330:375-409.
5. Mitchell BE, Lele SK, Moin P. Direct computation of the sound from a compressible co-rotating vortex pair. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 1999; 285:181-202.
6. Inoue O, Hatakeyama N. Sound generation by a two-dimensional circular cylinder in a uniform flow. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 2002; 471:285-314.
7. Hardin JC, Pope DS. An acoustic/viscous splitting technique for computational aeroacoustics. Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics 1994; 6:323-340.
8. Shen WZ, Sørensen JN. Comment on the aeroacoustic formulation of Hardin and Pope. AIAA Journal 1999; 1:141-143.
9. Ewert R, Schröder W. Acoustic perturbation equations based on flow decomposition via source filtering. Journal of Computational Physics 2003; 188:365-398.
10. Seo JH, Moon YJ. Perturbed compressible equations for aeroacoustic noise prediction at low Mach numbers. AIAA Journal 2005; 43:1716-1724.
11. Shen WZ, Sørensen JN. Acoustic modeling of low-speed flows. Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics 1999; 13:271-289.
12. Shen WZ, Sørensen JN. Aero-acoustic modelling of turbulent airfoil flows. AIAA Journal 2001; 39:1057-1064.
13. Shen WZ, Sørensen JN. A collocated grid finite volume method for aeroacoustic computations of low-speed flow. Journal of Computational Physics 2004; 196:348-366.
14. Tam CKW, Webb JC. Dispersion-Relation-Preserving finite difference schemes for computational acoustics. Journal of Computational Physics 1993; 107:262-281.
15. Lele SK. Compact finite difference schemes with spectral-like resolution. Journal of Computational Physics 1992; 103:16-42.
16. Kim JW, Lee DJ. Optimized compact finite difference schemes with maximum resolution. AIAA Journal 1996; 34:887-893.
17. Hu FQ, Hussaini MY, Manthey JL. Low-dissipation and low-dispersion Runge-Kutta schemes for computational acoustics. Journal of Computational Physics 1996; 124:177-191.
18. Carpenter MH, Gottlieb D, Abarbanel S. The stability of numerical boundary treatments for compact high-order finite-difference schemes. Journal of Computational Physics 1993; 108:272-295.
19. Bogey C, Bailly C. A family of low dispersive and low dissipative explicit schemes for noise computations. Journal of Computational Physics 2004; 194:194-214.
20. Tam CKW, Hardin JC (eds). Second computational aeroacoustics workshop on benchmark problems. NASA CP-3352, 1997.
21. Powell A. Theory of vortex sound. Journal of Acoustic Society of America 1964; 36:177-195.
22. Müller EA, Obermeier F. The spinning vortices as a source of sound. AGARD CP-22, 1967.
23. Lee DJ, Koo SO. Numerical study of sound generation due to a spinning vortex pair. AIAA Journal 1995; 33:20-26.
24. Ekaterinaris JA. Upwind scheme for the computation of acoustic field generated by incompressible flow. AIAA Journal 1997; 35:1448-1455.
25. Michelsen JA. Basis3D-a platform for development of multiblock PDE solvers. Technical Report AFM 92-05, Technical University of Denmark, 1992.
26. Sørensen NN. General purpose flow solver applied over hills. RISØ-R-827-(EN), Risø National Laboratory, Roskilde, Denmark, 1995.
27. Strouhal V. Ueber eine besondere art der tonerregung. Annalen Physik und Chemie 1878; 5:216-251.
28. Ta Phuoc L. Modèles de sous maille appliqués aux ecoulements instationnaires décollés. Proceedings of the DRET Conference, Aérodynamique Instationnaire Turbulente-Aspects Numériques et Expérimentaux, Paris, France, 1994.
29. Sagaut P. Large Eddy Simulation for Incompressible Flows (3rd edn). Springer: New York, 2006.
30. Shen WZ, Zhu WJ, Sørensen JN. Aeroacoustic computations for turbulent airfoil flows. AIAA Journal 2009; 47:1518-1527.
31. Sheldahl RE, Klimas PC. Aerodynamic characteristics of seven sirfoil sections through 180 degrees angle of attack for use in aerodynamic analysis of vertical axis wind turbines. Report SAND80-2114, Sandia National Labs., Albuquerque, NM, 1981.
32. Brooks TF, Pope DS, Marcolini MA. Airfoil Self-noise and Prediction, vol. 1218. National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Office of Management, Scientific and Technical Information Division: Washington, DC, 1989.