Power and false-positive rate in QTL detection with near-isogenic line libraries

Heredity

Volumn 106, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 576-584

  Falke, K C ^a   Frisch, M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HOHENHEIM   (Germany)

^b JUSTUS LIEBIG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

near isogenic lines; NIL library; QTL detection

Indexed keywords

BARLEY; GENETIC MARKER; GENOTYPE; HERITABILITY; MAIZE; POPULATION SIZE;

ARTICLE; BARLEY; GENE LIBRARY; GENETIC PROCEDURES; GENETICS; GENOTYPE; INBREEDING; MAIZE; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS; STANDARD;

GENE LIBRARY; GENETIC TECHNIQUES; GENOTYPE; HORDEUM; INBREEDING; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI; ZEA MAYS;

HORDEUM; ZEA MAYS;

EID: 79953106639     PISSN: 0018067X     EISSN: 13652540     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/hdy.2010.87     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J Royal Statistical Society B 57:289-300.
2. Eshed Y, Zamir D (1994). A genomic library of Lycopersicon pennellii in L. esculentum: A tool for fine mapping of genes. Euphytica 79:175-179.
3. Eshed Y, Zamir D (1995). An introgression line population of Lycopersicon pennellii in the cultivated tomato enables the identification and fine mapping of yield-associated QTL. Genetics 141:1147-1162.
4. Falke KC, Miedaner T, Frisch M (2009b). Selection strategies for the development of rye introgression libraries. Theor Appl Genet 119:595-603.
5. Falke KC, Sušić Z, Wilde P, Wortmann H, Möhring J, Piepho H-P et al. (2009a). Testcross performance of rye introgression lines developed by marker-based backcrossing using an Iranian accession as donor. Theor Appl Genet 118:1225-1238.
6. Haldane JBS (1919). The combination of linkage values, and the calculation of distance between the loci of linked factors. J Genet 8:299-309.
7. Holm S (1979). A Simple Sequentially Rejective Bonferroni Test Procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 6:65-70.
8. Kaeppler S (1997). Quantitative trait locus mapping using sets of near-isogenic lines: relative power comparisions and technical considerations. Theor Appl Genet 95:384-392. (Pubitemid 27392948)
9. Kearsey MJ (2002). QTL analysis: problems and (possible) solutions. In: Kang MS (ed). Quantitative Genetics, Genomics and Plant Breeding. Cabi: Oxford. pp 45-58.
10. Keurentjes JJB, Bentsink L, Alonso-Blanco C, Hanhart CJ, Vries HBD, Effgen S et al. (2007). Development of a near-isogenic line population of Arabidopsis thaliana and comparison of mapping power with a recombinant inbred line population. Genetics 175:891-905. (Pubitemid 46798284)
11. Lin SY, Sasaki T, Yano M (1998). Mapping quantitative trait loci controlling seed dormancy and heading date in rice, Oryza sativa L., using backcross inbred lines. Theor Appl Genet 96:997-1003. (Pubitemid 28329556)
12. Liu S, Zhou R, Dong Y, Li P, Jia J (2006). Development, utilization of introgression lines using a synthetic wheat as donor. Theor Appl Genet 112:1360-1373.
13. Matus I, Corey A, Filichkin T, Hayes PM, Vales MI, Kling J et al. (2003). Development and characterization of recombinant chromosome substitution lines (RCSLs) using Hordeum vulgare subsp. spontaneum as a source of donor alleles in a Hordeum vulgare subsp. vulgare background. Genome 46:1010-1023. (Pubitemid 38122442)
14. Maurer HP, Melchinger AE, Frisch M (2008). Population genetic simulation and data analysis with Plabsoft. Euphytica 161:133-139. (Pubitemid 351533941)
15. McCouch S (2004). Diversifying Selection in Plant Breeding. PLoS Biology 2: e347.
16. Prigge V, Maurer HP, Mackill DJ, Melchinger AE, Frisch M (2008). Comparison of the observed with the simulated distributions of the parental genome contribution in two marker-assisted backcross programs in rice. Theor Appl Genet 116:739-744.
17. Prigge V, Melchinger AE, Dhillon BS, Frisch M (2009). Efficiency gain of marker-assisted backcrossing by sequentially increasing marker densities over generations. Theor Appl Genet 119:23-32.
18. Ribaut J-M, Ragot M (2007). Marker-assisted selection to improve drought adaptation in maize: The backcross approach, perspectives, limitations, and alternatives. J Exper Bot 58:351-360. (Pubitemid 46204221)
19. Schmalenbach I, Körber N, Pillen K (2008). Selecting a set of wild barley introgression lines and verification of QTL effects for resistance to powdery mildew and leaf rust. Theor Appl Genet 117:1093-1106.
20. Searle SR (1971). Linear Models. Wiley: New York.
21. Stam P (1979). Interference in genetic crossing over and chromosome mapping. Genetics 92:573-594.
22. Syed NH, Pooni HS, Mei M, Chen ZJ, Kearsey MJ (2004). Optimising the construction of a substitution library in Arabidopsis thaliana using computer simulations. Mol Breed 13:59-68. (Pubitemid 38215490)
23. Szalma SJ, Hostert BM, LeDeaux JR, Stuber CW, Holland JB (2007). QTL mapping with near-isogenic lines in maize. Theor Appl Genet 114:1211-1228. (Pubitemid 46697831)
24. Tanksley SD, Grandillo S, Fulton TM, Zamir D, Eshed Y, Petiard V et al. (1996). Advanced backcross QTL analysis in a cross between an elite processing line of tomato and its wild relative L. pimpinellifolium. Theor Appl Genet 92:213-224. (Pubitemid 26263397)
25. Törjek O, Meyer RC, Zehnsdorf M, Teltow M, Strompen G, Witucka-Wall H et al. (2008). Construction and Analysis of 2 Reciprocal Arabidopsis Introgression Line Populations. J Hered 99:396-406.
26. Xiao JH, Li JM, Grandillo S, Ahn SN, Yuan LP, Tanksley SD et al. (1998). Identification of trait-improving quantitative trait loci alleles from a wild rice relative, Oryza rufipogon. Genetics 150:899-909. (Pubitemid 28463064)