SketchNode: Intelligent sketching support and formal diagramming

ACM International Conference Proceeding Series

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 136-143

  Plimmer, Beryl ^a   Purchase, Helen C ^b   Yang, Hong Yul ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Graph drawing; Interaction models; Sketching

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE; FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENT; GRAPH DRAWING; INTERACTION MODEL; INTERACTION PARADIGM; SKETCHING; USABILITY TESTS; VISUALIZATION TOOLS;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; DRAWING (GRAPHICS); INTERACTIVE COMPUTER SYSTEMS; VISUALIZATION;

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION;

EID: 79953085977     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1952222.1952249     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (31)

1. Alvarado, C., Davis, R., SketchREAD: a multi-domain sketch recognition engine in proc UIST, ACM, (2004), 23-32
2. Arvo, C and Novins K.,Appearance-preserving manipulation of hand-drawn graphs. Graphite, ACM, 2006, pp. 61-68. (Pubitemid 44030658)
3. Bailey, B. P. and Konstan J.A.. Are Informal Tools Better? Comparing DEMAIS, Pencil and Paper, and Authorware for Early Multimedia Design, CHI 2003, ACM, Ft Lauderdale, 2003, pp. 313-320.
4. Battista, G., Eades, P., Tamassia, R and Tollis, I. Algorithms for the Visualization of Graphs, Prentice Hall, 1999.
5. Black, A., Visible planning on paper and on screen: The impact of working medium on decision-making by novice graphic designers, Behaviour and information technology, 9, 4, (1990), 283-296
6. Blythe J, McGrath C, and Krackhardt D, The Effect of Graph Layout on Inference from Social Network Data, Proceedings of the Symposium on Graph Drawing, p40-51, LNCS 1027 Springer 1996.
7. Brna, P, Cox R., and Good J., Learning to Think and Communicate with Diagrams: 14 Questions to Consider, Artificial Intelligence Review, 15,1-2, 2001, p115-134 (Pubitemid 32409018)
8. Caetano, A., Goulart, N. Fonseca M. and Jorge J,. Javasketchit: Issues in sketching the look of user interfaces, AAAI Spring Symposium, AAAI Press, 9-14, 2002.
9. Chen, Q., Grundy J., and Hosking J. An E-whiteboard application to support early design-stage sketching of UML diagrams. VL/HCC, Auckland, NZ, 219-226, IEEE, 2003.
10. Coyette, A., Faulkner S., et al. SketchXML: towards a multiagent design tool for sketching user interfaces based on USIXML. Proceedings of the 3rd annual conference on Task models and diagrams, Prague, Czech Republic, ACM Press, 2004, p75-82
11. Damm, C. H., Hansen K.M., et al. Tool support for cooperative object-oriented design: Gesture based modelling on and electronic whiteboard. CHI, ACM, 2000, pp 518-525.
12. Freeman, I. and Plimmer, B. Edge Semantics for Sketched Diagram Recognition, in proceedings AUIC, ACM, 2007, pp71-78.
13. Fruchterman, M. J. T., and Reingold, M. E. Graph drawing by force-directed placement, Softw. Pract. Exper. 21:11, 1991, pp1129-1164.
14. Goldschmidt, G., The backtalk of self-generated sketches, in J. S. Gero and B. Tversky, eds., Visual and spatial reasoning in design, Key Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, 1999, pp. 163-184.
15. Hammond, T. and Davis R.. Tahuti: A Geometrical Sketch Recognition System for UML Class Diagrams. AAAI Spring Symposium on Sketch Understanding, 2002.
16. Hammond, T. and Davis, R.. LADDER: A Language to Describe Drawing, Display, and Editing in Sketch Recognition. IJCAI, 2003, pp12-19.
17. Landay, J. and Myers, B. Sketching storyboards to illustrate interface behaviors. CHI '96, Vancouver, BC Canada, ACM, 1996, pp 193-194.
18. Lank, E. H. A Retargetable Framework for Interactive Diagram Recognition. Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition - Volume 1, IEEE Computer Society, 2003, pp 185-189.
19. Microsoft, 2009, http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms700664(VS.85). aspx, (09/06/09)
20. Patel, R., Plimmer, B., Grundy, J. and Ihaka, R., Ink Features for Diagram Recognition, SBIM, Riverside, California, 2007.
21. Plimmer, B., Purchase, H., Yang, H. Y., Laycock, L and Milburn, J. Preserving the Hand-drawn Appearance of Graphs. International Workshop on Visual Languages and Computing, 2009, pp 347-352.
22. Plimmer, B. and Freeman, I. A Toolkit Approach to Sketched Diagram Recognition. HCI, Lancaster, UK, eWiC., 1, 2007, pp205-213.
23. Plimmer, B. E. and Apperley. M. Software for Students to Sketch Interface Designs. Interact, Zurich, 2003, pp73-80.
24. Purchase, H.C., Carrington, D. and Allder, J-A., Experimenting with aesthetics-based graph layout, Proceedings of the Theory and Application of Diagrams conference, Anderson, M., Cheng, P. and Haarslev, V. (eds), LNAI 1889, Springer Verlag, 2000, pp498-501.
25. Purchase, H.C., Carrington, D. and J.-A. Allder, Empirical Evaluation of Aesthetics-based Graph Layout Empirical Software Engineering, 7, 2002, pp. 233-255.
26. Purchase, H., Plimmer, B., Baker, R. and Pilcher, C. (2010). Graph drawing aesthetics in user-sketched graph layouts. AUIC, Brisbane, Australia, Crpit/ACM DL p. 80-88.
27. Reid, P., Hallett-Hook, F., Plimmer, B. and Purchase, H., Applying Layout Algorithms to Hand-drawn Graphs, OzCHI, ACM, 2007, pp. 203-206.
28. Tversky, B., What does drawing reveal about thinking, Visual and spatial reasoning in design, Cambridge, Mass., 1999, pp. 75-81.
29. Tom Sawyer Software, http://www.tomsawyer.com/home/index.php (11/06/09)
30. yWorks, yEd Graph Editor, www.yworks.com/products/yed/ (11/06/09).
31. Yeung, L., Plimmer, B. and Lobb, B. Elliffe, D. Effect of Fidelity in Diagram Presentation HCI 2008. D. England. Liverpool, BCS. 1, 2008, pp35-45