Quality of experience models for multimedia streaming

International Journal of Mobile Computing and Multimedia Communications

Volumn 2, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 1-20

  Menkovski, Vlado ^a   Exarchakos, Georgios ^a   Liotta, Antonio ^a   Sánchez, Antonio Cuadra ^b  

^a EINDHOVEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^b TELEFONICA RESEARCH   (Spain)

Author keywords

Machine learning; Online learning; QoE; QoE aware management; Quality of experience; User centric management

Indexed keywords

MACHINE-LEARNING; ONLINE LEARNING; QOE; QOE-AWARE MANAGEMENT; QUALITY OF EXPERIENCE; USER-CENTRIC MANAGEMENT;

COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY; E-LEARNING; FORECASTING; LEARNING SYSTEMS; MANAGEMENT; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MEDIA STREAMING; MULTIMEDIA SERVICES; STATISTICAL TESTS;

QUALITY OF SERVICE;

EID: 79953081343     PISSN: 19379412     EISSN: 19379404     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4018/jmcmc.2010100101     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. Agboma, F. (2009). Quality of Experience Management in Mobile Content Delivery Systems (Tech. Rep.). Colchester, UK: University of Essex, Department of Computing and Electronic Systems.
2. Agboma, F., & Liotta, A. (2007). Addressing user expectations in mobile content delivery. Mobile Information Systems, 3(3), 153-164.
3. Agboma, F., & Liotta, A. (2008). QoE-aware QoS management. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Advances in Mobile Computing and Multimedia, Linz, Austria (pp. 111-116). New York: ACM. doi:10.1145/1497185. 1497210
4. Bifet, A., Holmes, G., Pfahringer, B., Kirkby, R., & Gavaldà, R. (2009). New ensemble methods for evolving data streams. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining (pp. 139-148).
5. Breiman, L. (1996). Bagging predictors. Machine Learning, 24(2), 123-140. doi:10.1007/BF00058655 (Pubitemid 126724382)
6. Domingos, P., & Hulten, G. (2000). Mining highspeed data streams. In Proceedings of the sixth ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining (pp. 71-80).
7. Fechner, G. T., Boring, E. G., Adler, H. E., & Howes, D. H. (Eds.). (1966). Elements of psychophysics. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
8. Gama, J., Rocha, R., & Medas, P. (2003). Accurate decision trees for mining high-speed data streams. In Proceedings of the ninth ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining (pp. 523-528).
9. Hall, M., Frank, E., Holmes, G., Pfahringer, B., Reutemann, P., & Witten, I. (2009). The WEKA data mining software: An update. SIGKDD Explorations, 11(1).
10. Holmes, G., Kirkby, R., & Pfahringer, B. (2005). Stress-Testing Hoeffding Trees. In Knowledge Discovery in Databases: PKDD 2005 (pp. 495-502). Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/11564126-50
11. ITU-T. R. I. (1999). Subjective video quality assessment methods for multimedia applications.
12. Klecka, W. R. (1980). Discriminant analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
13. Kohavi, R. (1995). A Study of Cross-Validation and Bootstrap for Accuracy Estimation and Model Selection. IJCAI, 1137-1145. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/ summary?doi=10.1.1.48.529
14. Kohavi, R. (1996). Scaling up the accuracy of naive-Bayes classifiers: A decision-tree hybrid. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (Vol. 7).
15. Kohavi, R., & Kunz, C. (1997). Option Decision Trees with Majority Votes. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Machine Learning (pp. 161-169). San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc. Retrieved from http:// portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=756499
16. Oza, N. C., & Russell, S. (2001). Online bagging and boosting. In Artificial Intelligence and Statistics (pp. 105-112).
17. Pfahringer, B., Holmes, G., & Kirkby, R. (2007). New Options for Hoeffding Trees. In Proceedings of the Advances in Artificial Intelligence (AI 2007) (pp. 90-99). Retrieved from http://dx.doi. org/10.1007/978-3-540-76928-6- 11
18. Platt, J. C. (1998). Sequential Minimal Optimization: A Fast Algorithm for Training Support Vector Machines. doi:10.1.1.55.560
19. QoS arbitration for improving the QoE in multimedia transmission (2003). In Proceedings of the Visual Information Engineering (VIE 2003) (pp. 238-241).
20. Quinlan, J. R. (1983). Learning efficient classification procedures and their application to chess end games. Machine learning: An artificial intelligence approach, 1, 463-482.
21. Quinlan, J. R. (2003). C4.5. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
22. Takahashi, A., Hands, D., & Barriac, V. (2008). Standardization activities in the ITU for a QoE assessment of IPTV. Communications Magazine, IEEE, 46(2), 78-84. .doi:10.1109/MCOM.2008.4473087
23. Vapnik, V. (1982). Estimation of Dependences Based on Empirical Data: Springer Series in Statistics. New York: Springer Verlag. Retrieved from http://portal. acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1098680
24. Wang, Z., Bovik, A. C., & Lu, L. (2002). Why is image quality assessment so difficult? In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing, 4, 3313-3316.
25. Winkler, S. (2005). Digital video quality: vision models and metrics. New York: J. Wiley & Sons.
26. Winkler, S. (2007). Video Quality and Beyond. Symmetricom.
27. Winkler, S. (2009). Video Quality Measurement Standards - Current Status and Trends. In Proceedings of ICICS 2009. Retrieved from http://stefan. winkler.net/Publications/icics2009.pdf
28. Witten, I. H., & Frank, E. (2005). Data mining. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.