The military health system's personal health record pilot with Microsoft HealthVault and Google Health

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 118-124

  Do, Nhan V ^a   Barnhill, Rick ^b   Heermann Do, Kimberly A ^c   Salzman, Keith L ^b   Gimbel, Ronald W ^d  

^a WALTER REED ARMY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b MADIGAN ARMY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c Virginia Office of the Surgeon General   (United States)

^d UNIFORMED SERVICES UNIVERSITY OF THE HEALTH SCIENCES   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCESS TO INFORMATION; ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; DATA ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; MEDICAL RECORD; MILITARY SERVICE; PILOT STUDY; UNITED STATES;

ADULT; AGED; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; HEALTH RECORDS, PERSONAL; HOSPITALS, MILITARY; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MILITARY PERSONNEL; PATIENT PREFERENCE; PILOT PROJECTS; SOFTWARE; UNITED STATES; WASHINGTON;

EID: 79953073058     PISSN: 10675027     EISSN: 1527974X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/jamia.2010.004671     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Roblin DW, Houston TK 2nd, Allison JJ, et al. Disparities in use of a personal health record in a managed care organization. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2009;16:683-9.
2. Miller HD. Need for ePHRs to address critical problems in US healthcare. In: Miller HD, Yasnoff WA, Burde HA, eds. Personal Health Records: The Essential Missing Element in 21st Century Healthcare. Chicago: Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society, 2009:1-11.
3. Lober WB, Zierler B, Herbaugh A, et al. Barriers to the use of a personal health record by an elderly population. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2006:514-18.
4. Tang PC, Ash JS, Bates DW, et al. Personal health records: definitions, benefits, and strategies for overcoming barriers to adoption. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2006;13:121-6.
5. Rhodes HB. The PHR quandary. Despite the benefits, issues of technology and trust slow adoption. J AHIMA 2007;78:66-7, 69.
6. Detmer D, Bloomrosen M, Raymond B, et al. Integrated personal health records: transformative tools for consumer-centric care. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2008;8:45.
7. Johnston D, Kaelber D, Pan EC, et al. A framework and approach for assessing the value of personal health records (PHRs). AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2007:374-8.
8. Dullabh P, Burke-Bebee S. Emerging Approaches to PHR Design, Development and Use. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2008:937.
9. Rode D. PHR debates. The personal record gets political, but there is danger in rushing legislation. J AHIMA 2008;79:18, 20.
10. Kaelber D, Pan EC. The value of personal health record (PHR) systems. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2008:343-7.
11. Miller DY, William A, Howard B. Personal Health Record. Chicago: HIMSS, 2009.
12. Tang PC, Lee TH. Your doctor's office or the Internet? Two paths to personal health records. N Engl J Med 2009;360:1276-8.
13. Gimbel RW, Clyburn CA. Toward a DoD/VA longitudinal health record: politics and the policy landscape. Mil Med 2009;174:S4-11.
14. Collmann J. Force health protection: the mission and political context of the longitudinal health record. Mil Med. 2009;174(5):S12-20.
15. Hufnagel SP. National electronic health record interoperability chronology. Mil Med 2009;174:S35-42.
16. Goth G. A game changer? As Google and Microsoft put their PHR plays into action, CIOs formulate their next moves. Healthc Inform 2008;25:52-4.
17. Center MAM. Facility Overview & Statistics. 2010. http://www.mamc.amedd.army.mil/PAO/Overview&Stats.htm. (accessed 7 Oct 2010).
18. Keselman A, Slaughter L, Smith CA, et al. Towards consumer-friendly PHRs: patients' experience with reviewing their health records. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2007:399-403.
19. Ferranti JM, Musser RC, Kawamoto K, et al. The clinical document architecture and the continuity of care record: a critical analysis. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2006;13:245-52.
20. Merrill M. Patients, referring docs at MD Anderson making good use of web portal. Physician practices and ambulatory care. Healthcare IT News, 6 July 2010. http://www.healthcareitnews.com/news/patients-referring-docs-md-anderson-makinggood-use-web-portal (accessed 7 Dec 2010).
21. Halamka JD, Mandl KD, Tang PC. Early experiences with personal health records. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2008;15:1-7.
22. Simborg DW. The limits of free speech: the PHR problem. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2009;16:282-3.
23. Kim MI, Johnson KB. Personal health records: evaluation of functionality and utility. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2002;9:171-80.
24. Bodily NJ, Carlston DA, Rocha RA. Personal health records: key features within existing applications. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2007:875.
25. Lobach DF, Willis JM, Macri JM, et al. Perceptions of Medicaid beneficiaries regarding the usefulness of accessing personal health information and services through a patient Internet portal. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2006:509-13.
26. Evaluation of the TRICARE program. fiscal year 2009 report to Congress. February 2009. http://www.tricare.mil/hpae/_docs/TRICARE09_4-7-09.pdf (accessed 7 Dec 2010).
27. Gimbel RW, Pangaro L, Barbour G. America's undiscovered laboratory for health services research. Med Care 2010;48:751-6.
28. Benson T. Continuity of Care Document (CCD). Principles of Health Interoperability HL7 and SNOMED. London: Springer, 2010:156-60.
29. Dolin RH, Alschuler L, Beebe C, et al. The HL7 clinical document architecture. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2001;8:552-69.