The harmonization game: Reasons and rules in European biodiversity policy

Environmental Policy and Governance

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 99-111

  Hiedanpää, Juha ^a   Bromley, Daniel W ^b  

^a FINNISH FOREST RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Finland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

Habitats directive; Harmonization; Policy dispute; Policy pragmatism; Wolf (Canis lupus)

Indexed keywords

ADMINISTRATIVE SYSTEM; BIODIVERSITY; DECENTRALIZATION; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; EUROPEAN COMMISSION; EUROPEAN UNION; POLICY MAKING;

FINLAND;

CANIDAE; CANIS FAMILIARIS; CANIS LUPUS;

EID: 79953071826     PISSN: 1756932X     EISSN: 17569338     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/eet.561     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Alphandéry P, Fortier A. 2001. Can territorial policy be based on science alone: the system for creating the Natura 2000 network in France. Sociologia Ruralis 41: 311-328.
2. Anon. 2005. Suomen susikannan hoitosuunnitelma [Wolf Management Plan for Finland]. Maa- ja metsätalousministeriö 11/2005. Helsinki.
3. Baker S. 2003. The dynamics of European Union biodiversity policy: interactive, functional and institutional logics. Environmental Politics 12(3): 23-41.
4. Beunen R, van der Knaap WGM, Biesbroek GR. 2009. Implementation and integration of EU environmental directives: experiences from the Netherlands. Environmental Policy and Governance 19: 57-69.
5. Bisi J, Kurki S. 2008. The Wolf Debate in Finland: Expectations and Objectives for the Management of the Wolf Population at Regional and National Level. Publications 12. Seinäjoki: Helsinki University, Ruralia Institute.
6. Bisi J, Kurki S, Svensberg M, Liukkonen T. 2007. Human dimensions on wolf (Canis lupus) conflicts in Finland. European Journal of Wildlife Research 53(4): 304-314.
7. Brandom RB. 1994. Making it Explicit: Reasoning, Representing, and Discursive Commitment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8. Brandom RB. 2000. Articulating Reasons. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
9. Bromley DW. 2005. Purging the frontier from our mind: crafting a new fisheries policy. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 15: 217-229.
10. Bromley DW. 2006a. Sufficient Reason: Volitional Pragmatism and the Meaning of Economic Institutions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
11. Bromley DW. 2006b. The economics of whaling. In Whales, Whaling, and Ocean Ecosystems, Estes JA, DeMaster DP, Doak DF, Williams TM, Brownell Jr. RL (eds). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press; 363-372.
12. Bromley DW. 2008. The crisis in ocean governance: conceptual confusion, spurious economics, political indifference. MAST: Maritime Studies 6(2): 7-22; Rejoinder, 39-54.
13. Bromley DW. 2009. Abdicating responsibility: the deceits of fisheries policy. Fisheries 34(6): 280-90; Rejoinder, 299-302.
14. Caddy J. 1997. Hollow harmonisation? Closing the implementation cap in the central European environmental policy. European environment 7: 73-79.
15. Dean M. 2010. Governmentality: Power and Rule in Modern Society, 2nd edn. London: Sage.
16. European Parliament. 2008. Towards a 'European Cormorant Management Plan' to minimize the increasing impact of cormorants on fish stocks, fisheries and aquaculture. (2008/2177(INI)
17. Foucault M. 2008. The Birth of the Biopolitics. Lectures at the College de France 1978-1979 (translated by Graham Burchell). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
18. Hiedanpää J. 2002. European-wide conservation vs. local well-being: the reception of Natura 2000 reserve network in Karvia, SW-Finland. Landscape and Urban Planning 61(2-4): 113-123.
19. Hiedanpää J. 2005. The edges of conflict and consensus: a case for creativity in regional forest policy in Southwest Finland. Ecological Economics 55(4): 485-498.
20. Hiedanpää J, Bromley DW. 2010. Contestations over biodiversity policy: Considering Peircean Semeiosis. Manuscript. Environmental Values (forthcoming).
21. Knill C, Liefferink D. 2007. Environmental Politics in the European Union. Policy-Making, Implementation and Patterns of Multi-Level Governance. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
22. Kohler-Koch B. (ed.). 2003. Linking EU and National Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
23. Koppen IJ. 2001. The role of European Court of Justice. In European Union's Environmental Policy: Actors, Institutions and Processes, Jordan A. (ed.). London: Earthscan; 100-119.
24. Linnel J, Salvatore V, Boitani L. 2007. Guidelines for Population Level Management Plans for Large Carnivores. A Large Carnivore Initiative for Europe report prepared for the European Commission. Final draft May.
25. Maurer A, Mittag J, Wessels W. 2003. National system's adaptation to the EU system: trends, offers, and constraints. In Linking EU and National Governance, Kohler-Koch B (ed). Oxford: Oxford University Press; 53-81.
26. McCormick J. 2001. Environmental Policy in the European Union. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
27. Mehtälä J, Vuorisalo, T. 2007 Conservation policy and the EU Habitats Directive: Favourable conservation status as a measure of conservation success. European Environment 17: 363-375.
28. Norgaard RB. 1984. Coevolutionary development potential. Land Economics 60(2): 160-173.
29. Norgaard RB. 1994. Development Betrayed: The End of Progress and a Coevolutionary Revisioning of the Future. London: Routledge.
30. Oksanen A. 2003. Paikallisuuden ja kansainvälisyyden kohtaaminen luonnonsuojelussa. Tapaustutkimuksena Natura 2000 - ympäristökonflikti Lounais-Suomessa. Ann.Univ.Turkuensis C 192. Turku: Turun yliopisto.
31. Paavola J. 2004. Protected areas governance and justice: theory and the European Union's Habitats Directive. Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences 1(1): 59-77.
32. Paavola J, Kluvánková-Oravská T, Gouldson A. 2009. Institutions, ecosystems and the interplay of actors, scales, frameworks and regimes in the governance of biodiversity. Environmental Policy and Governance 19: 148-158.
33. Palviainen S. 2000. Pohjoiskarjalaisten luonnonkäyttäjien kokemuksia suurpedoista. Julkaisuja 51. Joensuu: Pohjois-Karjalan liitto.
34. Peirce CS. 1957. Essays in the Philosophy of Science. Tomas, V. (ed.). New York: The Liberal Arts Press.
35. Ratamäki O. 2008. Finland's wolf policy and new governance. The Journal of Environment & Development 17(3): 316-339.
36. Rauschmayer F, Behrens V. 2008. Legitimacy of species management: the great cormorant in the EU. In Legitimacy in European Nature Conservation Policy: Case Studies in Multilevel Governance, Keulartz J, Leistra G (eds). Berlin: Springer; 55-74.
37. Rauschmayer F, Paavola J, Wittmer H. 2009. European governance of natural resources and participation in a multi-level context: an editorial. Environmental Policy and Governance 19: 141-147.
38. Samuels WJ. 1989. The legal-economic nexus. George Washington Law Review 57(6): 1556-1578.
39. Sandström C, Pellikka P, Ratamäki O, Sande A. 2009. Management of large carnivores in Fennoscandia: new patterns of regional participation. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 14(1): 37-50.
40. Sauer A. 2005. European nature conservation policy: challenges for local implementation in Germany. In From Landscape Research to Landscape Planning: Aspects of Integration, Education and Application, Tress B, Tress G, Fry G, Odman P (eds). Berlin: Springer; 173-192.
41. Stoll-Kleemann S. 2001. Barriers to nature conservation in Germany: a model of explaining opposition to protected areas. Journal of Experimental Psychology 21: 369-385.
42. Stone Sweet A. 2004. The Judicial Construction of Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
43. Stone Sweet A, Sandholtz W, Fligstein N (eds) 2001. The Institutionalization of Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.