Universities and intellectual property: Shaping a new patent policy for government funded academic research

Shaping Science and Technology Policy: The Next Generation of Research

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 55-76

  Sampat, Bhaven N ^a  

^a Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79953055275     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (42)

1. Agrawal, A., and R. Henderson. 2002. Putting patents in context: Exploring knowledge transfer from MIT. Management Science 48 (1): 44-60.
2. Association of University Technology Managers (AUTM). 1998. The AUTM Licensing Survey 1998, Survey Summary. Norwalk, CT: AUTM.
3. Association of University Technology Managers (AUTM). 2002. The AUTM Licensing Survey: FY 2001. Norwalk, CT: AUTM.
4. Bremer, H. 2001. The First Two Decades of the Bayh-Dole Act as Public Policy: Presentation to the National Association of State Universities and Land Grant Colleges [onlin. New York: National Association of State Universities and Land Grant Colleges, 11 November 2001 [cited 14 September 2004]. Available at http://www.nasulgc.org/COTT/Bayh-Dohl/Bremer_speech.htm
5. Broad, W. 1979a. Patent bill returns bright idea to inventor (in News and Comment). Science 205: 473-76.
6. Bremer, H. 1979b. Whistle blower reinstated at HEW. Science 205: 476.
7. Bush, V. 1943. The Kilgore bill. Science 98 (2557): 571-77.
8. Cohen, W., R. Nelson, and J. Walsh. 2002. Links and impacts: The influence of public research on industrial R&D. Management Science 48 (1): 1-23.
9. Crane, D. 1972. Invisible Colleges: Diffusion of Knowledge in Scientific Communities. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
10. Dasgupta, P., and P. David. 1994. Towards a new economics of science. Research Policy 23 (5): 487-521.
11. de Solla Price, D. 1963. Little Science, Big Science. NewYork: Columbia Univ. Press.
12. The Economist. 2002. Innovation's Golden Goose. Economist 365 (8303): T3.
13. Eisenberg, R. 1996. Public research and private development: Patents and technology transfer in government-sponsored research. Virginia Law Review 82: 1663-727.
14. Eskridge, N. 1978. Dole blasts HEW for 'stonewalling' patent applications. Bioscience 28: 605-6.
15. Federal Council on Science and Technology. 1978. Report on Government Patent Policy, 1973-1976. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
16. Forman, H. I. 1957. Patents: Their Ownership and Administration by the United States Government. New York: Central Book Company.
17. Gambardella, A. 1995. Science and Innovation. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.
18. Guston, D. H. 2000. Between Politics and Science: Assuring the Integrity and Productivity of Research. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.
19. Harbridge House, Inc. 1968a. Effects of government policy on commercial utilization and business competition. In Government Patent Policy Study, Final Report. Washington, DC: Federal Council for Science and Technology.
20. Harbridge House, Inc. 1968b. Effects of patent policy on government R&D programs. In Government Patent Policy Study, Final Report. Washington, DC: Federal Council for Science and Technology.
21. Henig, R. 1979. New patent policy bill gathers Congressional support. Bioscience 29 (May): 281-84.
22. Kevles, D. 1977. The National Science Foundation and the debate over postwar research policy, 1942-45. Isis 68: 5-26.
23. Kitcher, P. 1993. The Advancement of Science. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.
24. Merges, R., and R. Nelson. 1994. On limiting or encouraging rivalry in technical progress: The effect of patent scope decisions. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 25: 1-24.
25. Merton, R. K. 1973. The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
26. Mowery, D., and B. Sampat. 2001a. Patenting and licensing university inventions:Lessons from the history of the research corporation. Industrial and Corporate Change 10: 317-55.
27. Mowery, D., and B. Sampat. 2001b. University patents, patent policies, and patent policy debates, 1925-1980. Industrial and Corporate Change 10: 781-814.
28. Mowery, D., R. Nelson, B. Sampat, and A. Ziedonis. 2003. The Ivory Tower and Industrial Innovation: University Patenting Before and After Bayh-Dole. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford Univ. Press.
29. Nelson, R. 2002. The market economy and the republic of science. Draft.
30. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). 2002. Benchmarking Science-Industry Relationships. Paris: OECD.
31. Polanyi, M. 1962. The republic of science: Its political and economic theory. Minerva 1: 54-74.
32. Rai, A. T., and R. S. Eisenberg. 2002. The public and the private in biopharmaceutical research. Paper presented at the Conference on the Public Domain, at Duke University, Durham, NC.
33. Reimers, N. 1998. Stanford's Office of Technology Licensing and the Cohen/Boyer Cloning Patents: An Oral History Conducted in 1997 by Sally Smith Hughes, Ph.D., Regional Oral History Office. Berkeley, CA: The Bancroft Library.
34. Rosenberg, N., and R. R. Nelson. 1994. American Universities and Technical Advance in Industry. Research Policy 23: 323-48.
35. Sampat, B., and R. R. Nelson. 2002. The emergence and standardization of university technology transfer offices: A case study of institutional change. Advances in Strategic Management 19.
36. Stokes, D. E. 1997. Pasteur's Quadrant: Basic Science and Technological Innovation. Washington, DC: Brookings Institute.
37. Thursby, J., R. Jensen, and M. Thursby. 2001. Objectives, characteristics and outcomes of university licensing: A survey of major U.S. universities. Journal of Technology Transfer 26: 59-72.
38. Trune, D., and L. Goslin. 1998. University technology transfer programs: A profit/loss analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 57: 197-204.
39. U.S. General Accounting Office. 1968. Problem Areas Affecting Usefulness of Results of Government-Sponsored Research in Medicinal Chemistry: A Report to the Congress. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
40. U.S. Office of Management and Budget. 1963. Memorandum and statement of government patent policy. Federal Register 28: 10943-46.
41. U.S. Office of Management and Budget. 1971. Memorandum and statement of government patent policy. Federal Register 36: 16886.
42. Ziman, J. M. 1968. Public Knowledge: An Essay Concerning the Social Dimension of Science. London: Cambridge Univ. Press.