A regional assessment of information technology sophistication in Missouri Nursing Homes

Policy, Politics, and Nursing Practice

Volumn 11, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 214-225

  Alexander, Gregory L ^a   Madsen, Richard ^a   Wakefield, Douglas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

Author keywords

electronic health record; health care systems; information technology; nursing homes

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; INFORMATION PROCESSING; NURSING HOME; NURSING INFORMATICS; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; SYSTEM ANALYSIS; UNITED STATES;

DATA COLLECTION; MEDICAL RECORDS SYSTEMS, COMPUTERIZED; MISSOURI; NURSING HOMES; NURSING INFORMATICS; SYSTEMS INTEGRATION;

EID: 79953050405     PISSN: 15271544     EISSN: 15527468     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1527154410386616     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Alexander, G.L., & Madsen, R. (2009). IT sophistication and quality measures in nursing homes. Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 35, 22-27.
2. Alexander, G.L., Madsen, R., Herrick, S., & Russell, B. (2008). Measuring IT sophistication in nursing homes (Rep. No. 08-0034-CD). Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
3. Alexander, G.L., Rantz, M.J., Flesner, M.K., Diekemper, M., & Siem, C. (2007). Clinical information systems in nursing homes: An evaluation of initial implementation strategies. CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing, 25, 189-197.
4. Alexander, G.L., & Wakefield, D.S. (2009). Information technology sophistication in nursing homes. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 10, 398-407.
5. California Health Foundation. (2008). The state of health information technology in California: Use among hospitals and long term care facilities. Oakland: California Health Foundation.
6. Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services, Medicare and Medicaid Programs, Electronic Health Record Incentive Program. (2010, January 13). 42 CFR Parts 412, 413, 422, and 495, CMS0033-P.
7. Cheney, P.H., & Dickson, G.W. (1982). Organizational characteristics and information systems: An exploratory investigation. Academy of Management Journal, 25, 170-184.
8. Committee on Data Standards for Patient Safety. (2003). Key capabilities of an electronic health record system. Washington DC: Institute of Medicine National Academies Press.
9. Cook, P.J., & Mizer, K.L. (1989). The revised ERS county topology: An overview (Rep. No. Rural Development Report 89). Washington DC: US Government Printing Office.
10. Cowles Research Group. (2000). Nursing home statistical yearbook, 2000. Washington DC: American Association of Homes and Services for the Aging.
11. Culler, S.D., Atherly, A., Walczak, S., Davis, A., Hawley, J.N., Rask, K.J.,et al.(2006). Urban-rural differences in the availability of hospital information technology applications: A survey of Georgia hospitals. The Journal of Rural Health, 22, 242-247.
12. Department of Health and Human Services. (2008). AHIC use cases. Retrieved September 24, 2010, from http://hitsp.wikispaces.com/AHIC+Use+Cases.
13. Fisher, C. (1998, March). Linking payment and quality. Provider, 26-37.
14. Jaana, M., Ward, M.M., Pare, G., & Wakefield, D.S. (2005). Clinical information technology in hospitals: A comparison between the state of Iowa and two provinces in Canada. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 74, 719-731.
15. Mantas, J., Ammenwerth, E., Demiris, G., Hasman, A., Haux, R., Hersh, W.,et al.(2010). Recommendations of the International Medical Informatics Association (IMIA) on education in biomedical and health informatics. Methods of Information in Medicine, 2, 1-16.
16. National Center for Health Statistics. (2010). FastStats. Retrieved September 24, 2010, from http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/nursingh.htm.
17. Nolan, R.L. (1973). Managing the computer resource: A stage hypothesis. Communications of the ACM, 16, 399-405.
18. Pare, G., & Sicotte, C. (2001). Information technology sophistication in health care: An instrument validation study among Canadian hospitals. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 63, 205-223.
19. Peifer, S., & Pennsylvania Association of Nonprofit Homes for the Aging. (2008). The state of technology in aging services in Pennsylvania. Washington DC: Center for Aging Services Technologies.
20. Presidents Information Technology Advisory Committee. (2004). Revolutionizing health care through information technology. Arlington, VA: National Coordination Office for Information Technology Research and Development.
21. Rantz M.J., Alexander, G.L., Galambos, C., Flesner, M.K., Vogelsmeier, A., Hicks, L.et al.Evaluation of the Use of Beside Technology to Improve Quality of Care in Nursing Facilities: A Qualitative Analysis. CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing, (IN PRESS).
22. Rantz, M.J., Hicks, L., Petroski, G.F., Madsen, R.W., Alexander, G.L., Galambos, C.et al.(2010). Cost, Staffing, and Quality Impact of Bedside Electronic Medical Record (EMR) in Nursing Homes. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 11, 485-493.
23. Resnick, H.E., Manard, B.B., Stone, R.I., & Alwan, M. (2009). Use of electronic information systems in nursing homes: United States, 2004. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 16, 179-186.
24. Skubic, M., Alexander, G.L., Popescu, M., Rantz, M.J., & Keller, J. (2009). A smart home application to eldercare: Current status and lessons learned. Technology and Health Care, 17, 183-201.
25. Technology Informatics Guiding Education Reform. (2009). The TIGER initiative: Collaborating to integrate evidence and informatics into nursing practice and education: An executive summary. Retrieved September 24, 2010, from http://www.tigersummit.com/uploads/TIGER_Collaborative_Exec_Summary_040509.pdf.
26. Ward, M.M., Jaana, M., Bahensky, J.A., Vartak, S., & Wakefield, D.S. (2006). Clinical information system availability and use in urban and rural hospitals. Journal of Medical Systems, 30, 429-438.