Development of a knowledge based hybrid neural network (KBHNN) for studying the effect of diafiltration during ultrafiltration of whey

Desalination

Volumn 273, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 168-178

  Sen, Dwaipayan ^a   Roy, Anirban ^a,b   Bhattacharya, Apratim ^a,c   Banerjee, Debadrito ^a   Bhattacharjee, Chiranjib ^a  

^a JADAVPUR UNIVERSITY   (India)

^b Lehigh University ^*  (United States)

^c Lehigh University   (United States)

Author keywords

Diafiltration; First principle model; Knowledge based hybrid neural network; Levenberg Marqurt algorithm; Ultrafiltration

Indexed keywords

COMBINATORIAL APPROACH; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; DIAFILTRATION; DRIVING FORCES; FILM LAYERS; FIRST PRINCIPLE MODEL; FIRST PRINCIPLE MODELS; FUNCTION OF TIME; HYBRID NETWORK; HYBRID NEURAL NETWORKS; KNOWLEDGE BASED HYBRID NEURAL NETWORK; LEVENBERG-MARQURT ALGORITHM; MEMBRANE DYNAMICS; MEMBRANE SURFACE; STOCHASTIC MODELLING;

ALGORITHMS; KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEMS; NETWORK ARCHITECTURE; NEURAL NETWORKS; STOCHASTIC SYSTEMS; ULTRAFILTRATION;

STOCHASTIC MODELS;

ALGORITHM; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; MEMBRANE; MODELING; STOCHASTICITY; ULTRAFILTRATION;

EID: 79953044207     PISSN: 00119164     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2010.10.038     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Masse L., Massé D.I., Pellerin Y., Dubreuil J. Osmotic pressure and substrate resistance during the concentration of manure nutrients by reverse osmosis membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2010, 348:28-33.
2. Zhang G., Liu Z., Zhao L., Li H., Zhou Q., He F., Xu Z., Wang H. Recovery of glutamic acid from ultrafiltration concentrate using diafiltration with isoelectric supernatants. Desalination 2003, 154:17-26.
3. Foley G. Water usage in variable volume diafiltration: comparison with ultrafiltration and constant volume diafiltration. Desalination 2006, 196:160-163.
4. Vikbjerg A.F., Jonsson G., Mu H., Xu X. Application of ultrafiltration membranes for purification of structured phospholipids produced by lipase-catalyzed acidolysis. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2006, 50:184-191.
5. Arabelle M., Georges D., Bernard C. Ultrafiltration modes of operation for the separation of α-lactalbumin from acid casein whey. J. Membr. Sci. 1999, 153:9-21.
6. Williams G., Nakao S., Smolders C.A. Flux limitation in ultrafiltration: osmostic pressure model and gel layer model. J. Membr. Sci. 1984, 20:115-124.
7. Fane A.G. Ultrafiltration: factors influencing flux and rejection. Progress in Filtration and Separation 1986, vol. IV:101-179. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
8. Aimar P., Field R. Limiting flux in membrane separations: a model based on the viscosity dependency of the mass transfer coefficient. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1992, 47:579-586.
9. Srebnik S. Polymer adsorption on multicomponent surfaces with relevance to membrane fouling. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2003, 58:5291-5298.
10. Serpen G., Tekkedil D.K., Orra M. A knowledge-based artificial neural network classifier for pulmonary embolism diagnosis. Comput. Biol. Med. 2008, 38:204-220.
11. Bhattacharjee C., Sen D., Sarkar P., Datta S., Bhattacharya P.K. Studies on the application of different ANNs to predict permeate flux in rotating disk membrane modules: a case study with MATLAB™. Desalin. Water Treat. 2009, 2:170-184.
12. Curcio S., Calabro V., Iorio G. Reduction and control of flux decline in cross-flow membrane processes modeled by artificial neural networks and hybrid systems. Desalination 2009, 236:234-243.
13. Curcio S., Scilingo G., Calabro' V., Iorio G. Ultrafiltration of BSA in pulsating conditions: an artificial neural networks approach. J. Membr. Sci. 2005, 246(2):235-247.
14. Bollas G.M., Papadokonstadakis S., Michalopoulos J., Arampatzis G., Lappas A.A., Vasalos I.A., Lygeros A. Using hybrid neural networks in scaling up an FCC model from a pilot plant to an industrial unit. Chem. Eng. Process. 2003, 42:697-713.
15. Thompson M.L., Kramer M.A. Modeling chemical processes using prior knowledge and neural networks. AIChE J. 1994, 40(8):1328-1340.
16. De S., Bhattacharya P.K. Flux prediction of black liquor in cross flow ultrafiltration using low and high rejecting membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 1996, 109:109-123.
17. Bradford M.M. Rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 1976, 72:248-254.
18. Ballin N.Z. Estimation of whey protein in casein coprecipitate and milk powder by high-performance liquid chromatography quantification of cysteine. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2006, 54:4131-4135.
19. Schirmer B., Melling A., Durst F. A new method for the determination of membrane permeability by spatially resolved concentration measurements. Meas. Sci. Technol. 2004, 15:195-202.
20. Georgieva P., de Azevedo S.F. Application of feed forward neural networks in modeling and control of a fed-batch crystallization process. Proc. World Acad. Sci. Eng. Technol. 2006, 12:65-70.
21. Kamali M.J., Mousavi M. Analytic, neural network, and hybrid modeling of supercritical extraction of α-pinene. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2008, 47:168-173.
22. Anderson J.S., McAvoy T.J., Hao O.J. Use of hybrid models in wastewater systems. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2000, 39:1694-1704.
23. Kuzmenko D., Arkhangelsky E., Belfer S., Freger V., Gitis V. Chemical cleaning of UF membranes fouled by BSA. Desalination 2005, 179:323-333.
24. Salgin S., Takaç S., Özdamar T.H. Adsorption of bovine serum albumin on polyether sulfone ultrafiltration membranes: determination of interfacial interaction energy and effective diffusion coefficient. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 278:251-260.