Seeking confirmation is rational for deterministic hypotheses

Cognitive Science

Volumn 35, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 499-526

  Austerweil, Joseph L ^a   Griffiths, Thomas L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Bayesian inference; Confirmation bias; Decision making; Determinism; Hypothesis testing; Rational analysis

Indexed keywords

EID: 79953040757     PISSN: 03640213     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01161.x     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Brown, S. D., & Steyvers, M. (2009). Detecting and predicting changes. Cognitive Psychology, 58, 49-67.
2. Chandler, M. J., & Lalonde, C. E. (1994). Surprising, miraculous, and magical turns of events. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 12, 83-95.
3. Coen, M. H., & Gao, Y. (2009). Learning from games: Inductive bias and Bayesian inference. In N. Taatgen & H. van Rijk (Eds.), Proceedings of the 31st annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 2729-2734). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
4. Cover, T. M., & Thomas, J. A. (1991). Elements of information theory. New York: Wiley.
5. Doucet, A., de Freitas, N., & Gordon, N. (2001). Sequential Monte Carlo methods in practice. New York: Springer.
6. Gelman, S. (2003). The essential child. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
7. Gelman, S., Coley, J. D., & Gottfried, G. M. (1994). Essentialist beliefs in children: The acquisition of concepts and theories. In L. Hirschfeld & S. Gelman (Eds.), Mapping the mind: Domain specificity in cognition and culture (pp. 341-365). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
8. Griffiths, T. L. (2005). Causes, coincidences, and theories. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University.
9. Klayman, J. (1987). An information theory analysis of the value of information in hypothesis testing (Tech. Rep. No. 119a). Chicago: University of Chicago.
10. Klayman, J. (1995). Varieties of confirmation bias. In J. Busemeyer, R. Hastie & D. Medin (Eds.), Psychology of learning and motivation: Vol. 32. Decision making from a cognitive perspective (pp. 365-418). New York: Academic Press.
11. Klayman, J., & Ha, Y.-W. (1987). Confirmation, disconfirmation, and information. Psychological Review, 94, 211-228.
12. Levy, R., Reali, F., & Griffiths, T. L. (2009). Modeling the effects of memory on human online sentence processing with particle filters. In D. Koller, D. Schuurmans, Y. Bengio, & L. Bottou (Eds.), Advances in neural information processing systems 21 (pp. 937-944). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
13. Luhmann, C. C., & Ahn, W. (2003). Evaluating the causal role of unobserved variables. In R. Alterman & D. Kirsh (Eds.), Proceedings of the 24th annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 734-739). Boston, MA: Cognitive Science Society.
14. Marr, D. (1982). Vision. San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman.
15. Nelson, J. D. (2005). Finding useful questions: On Bayesian diagnosticity, probability, impact, and information gain. Psychological Review, 112, 979-999.
16. Nelson, J. D., & Movellan, J. R. (2001). Active inference in concept learning. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 13, 45-51.
17. Oaksford, M., & Chater, N. (1994). A rational analysis of the selection task as optimal data selection. Psychological Review, 101, 608-631.
18. Oaksford, M., & Chater, N., Grainger, B., & Larkin, J. (1997). Optimal data selection in the reduced array selection task (rast). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23(2), 441-458.
19. Perfors, A. F., & Navarro, D. J. (2009). Confirmation bias is rational when hypotheses are sparse. In N. Taatgen & H. van Rijk (Eds.), Proceedings of the 31st annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 2741-2746). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
20. Popper, K. R. (1935/1990). The logic of scientific discovery. Boston: Unwin Hyman.
21. Sanborn, A. N., Griffiths, T. L., & Navarro, D. J. (2006). A more rational model of categorization. In R. Sun & N. Miyake (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 726-731). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
22. Schulz, L. E., & Sommerville, J. (2006). God does not play dice: Causal determinism and preschool causal inferences. Child Development, 77(2), 427-442.
23. Shannon, C. E. (1948). The mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal, 27, 379-423, 623-656.
24. Shi, L., Feldman, N. H., & Griffiths, T. L. (2008). Performing Bayesian inference with exemplar models. In B. Love, K. McRae, & V. Sloutsky (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 745-750). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
25. Tenenbaum, J. B. (1999). A Bayesian framework for concept learning. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
26. Tenenbaum, J. B., & Griffiths, T. L. (2001). Generalization, similarity, and Bayesian inference. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 629-641.
27. Wason, P. C. (1960). On the failure to eliminate hypotheses in a conceptual task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 12, 129-140.
28. Wason, P. C. (1968a). On the failure to eliminate hypotheses - a second look. In P. C. Wason & P. N. Johnson-Laird (Eds.), Thinking and reasoning (pp. 165-174). Harmondsworth, Middlesex, England: Penguin.
29. Wason, P. C. (1968b). Reasoning about a rule. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 20(3), 273-281.