In-hospital outcomes of very elderly patients (85 years and older) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention

Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions

Volumn 77, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 634-641

  Appleby, Clare E ^a   Ivanov, Joan ^a   MacKie, Karen ^a   Džavík, Vladimír ^a   Overgaard, Christopher B ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY HEALTH NETWORK   (Canada)

^b TORONTO GENERAL HOSPITAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

acute coronary syndrome; atherosclerosis; percutaneous coronary intervention; survival

Indexed keywords

ACUTE KIDNEY FAILURE; ADULT; AGED; AGED HOSPITAL PATIENT; ARTICLE; BRAIN HEMORRHAGE; CARDIOGENIC SHOCK; CAUSE OF DEATH; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY RECANALIZATION; FEMALE; HEART INFARCTION; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE FAILURE; HIGH RISK POPULATION; HUMAN; KIDNEY HEMORRHAGE; LENGTH OF STAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORTALITY; NEUROLOGIC DISEASE; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; REPEAT PROCEDURE; RISK ASSESSMENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGE FACTORS; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AGING; ANGIOPLASTY, BALLOON, CORONARY; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; FEMALE; HOSPITAL MORTALITY; HUMANS; INPATIENTS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; ODDS RATIO; ONTARIO; PATIENT SELECTION; PROPENSITY SCORE; REGISTRIES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTORS; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 79953039019     PISSN: 15221946     EISSN: 1522726X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ccd.22729     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Rosamond W, Flegal K, Friday G, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2007 update: A report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Circulation 2007; 115: e69-e171. (Pubitemid 46226160)
2. Trial of invasive versus medical therapy in elderly patients with chronic symptomatic coronary-artery disease (TIME): A randomised trial. Lancet 2001; 358: 951-957.
3. Feldman DN, Gade CL, Slotwiner AJ, Parikh M, Bergman G, Wong SC, Minutello RM,. Comparison of outcomes of percutaneous coronary interventions in patients of three age groups (<60, 60 to 80, and >80 years) (from the New York State Angioplasty Registry). Am J Cardiol 2006; 98: 1334-1339.
4. Floyd KC, Jayne JE, Kaplan AV, Friedman BJ, Niles NW, Hettleman BD, Robb JF, Thompson CA,. Age-based differences of percutaneous coronary intervention in the drug-eluting stent era. J Interv Cardiol 2006; 19: 381-387. (Pubitemid 44511067)
5. Graham MM, Ghali WA, Faris PD, Galbraith PD, Norris CM, Knudtson ML,; for the Alberta Provincial Project for Outcomes Assessment in Coronary Heart Disease I. Survival after coronary revascularization in the elderly. Circulation 2002; 105: 2378-2384.
6. Pfisterer M, Buser P, Osswald S, et al. Outcome of elderly patients with chronic symptomatic coronary artery disease with an invasive vs. optimized medical treatment strategy: One-year results of the randomized TIME Trial. JAMA 2003; 289: 1117-1123. (Pubitemid 37430325)
7. Lee PY, Alexander KP, Hammill BG, Pasquali SK, Peterson ED,. Representation of elderly persons and women in published randomized trials of acute coronary syndromes. JAMA 2001; 286: 708-713. (Pubitemid 33010364)
8. Batchelor WB, Anstrom KJ, Muhlbaier LH, Grosswald R, Weintraub WS, O'Neill WW, Peterson ED,. Contemporary outcome trends in the elderly undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions: Results in 7,472 octogenarians. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000; 36: 723-730.
9. Klein LW, Block P, Brindis RG, McKay CR, McCallister BD, Wolk M, Weintraub W,. Percutaneous coronary interventions in octogenarians in the American College of Cardiology-National Cardiovascular Data Registry: Development of a nomogram predictive of in-hospital mortality. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002; 40: 394-402. (Pubitemid 34833151)
10. Bryan P, Yan Gurvitch R, Duffy SJ, et al. An evaluation of octogenarians undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention from the Melbourne Interventional Group registry. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2007; 70: 928-936.
11. Varani E, Aquilina M, Balducelli M, Vecchi G, Frassineti V, Maresta A,. Percutaneous coronary interventions in octogenarians: Acute and 12 month results in a large single-centre experience. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2009; 73: 449-454.
12. Moreno R, Salazar A, Bañuelos C, Hernández R, Alfonso F, Sabaté M, Escaned J, Pérez MJ, Azcona L, Macaya C,. Effectiveness of percutaneous coronary interventions in nonagenarians. Am J Cardiol 2004; 94: 1058-1060. (Pubitemid 39336445)
13. Teplitsky I, Assali A, Lev E, Brosh D, Vaknin-Assa H, Kornowski R,. Results of percutaneous coronary interventions in patients >90 years of age. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2007; 70: 937-943.
14. Lee MS, Zimmer R, Pessegueiro A, Jurewitz D, Tobis J,. Outcomes of nonagenarians who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2008; 71: 526-530. (Pubitemid 351498098)
15. Ma HY, Zhou Y, Dick RJ, Shi DM, Liu YY, Cheng WJ, Guo YH, Wang JL, Ge HL,. Long-term outcome of patients of over 85 years old with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary stenting: A comparison of bare metal stent and drug eluting stent. Chin Med J 2008; 121: 887-891.
16. Osten MD, Ivanov J, Eichhofer J, et al. Impact of renal insufficiency on angiographic, procedural, and in-hospital outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol 2008; 101: 780-785.
17. Smith SC, Dove JT, Jacobs AK, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for percutaneous coronary intervention (revision of the 1993 PTCA guidelines)-Executive summary: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines (Committee to revise the 1993 guidelines for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty) endorsed by the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001; 37: 2215-2238.
18. Garrett N, Martini EM,. The boomers are coming: a total cost of care model of the impact of population aging on the cost of chronic conditions in the United States. Dis Manag 2007; 10: 51-60. (Pubitemid 46709328)
19. Pfisterer M,; for the TI. Long-term outcome in elderly patients with chronic angina managed invasively versus by optimized medical therapy: Four-year follow-up of the randomized trial of invasive versus medical therapy in elderly patients (TIME). Circulation 2004; 110: 1213-1218. (Pubitemid 39202335)
20. Bhatt DL, Roe MT, Peterson ED, et al. Utilization of early invasive management strategies for high-risk patients with non-st-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: Results from the CRUSADE quality improvement initiative. JAMA 2004; 292: 2096-2104. (Pubitemid 39435100)
21. Wenaweser P, Ramser M, Windecker S, Lütolf I, Meier B, Seiler C, Eberli FR, Hess OM,. Outcome of elderly patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2007; 70: 485-490. (Pubitemid 47597015)
22. de Boer M-J, Ottervanger J-P, van't Hof AWJ, Hoorntje JCA, Suryapranata H, Zijlstra F,. Reperfusion therapy in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction: A randomized comparison of primary angioplasty and thrombolytic therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002; 39: 1723-1728. (Pubitemid 34595279)
23. Yan BP, Gurvitch R, Duffy SJ, et al. An evaluation of octogenarians undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention from the Melbourne Interventional Group registry. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2007; 70: 928-936.
24. Recio-Mayoral A, Chaparro M, Prado B, Cozar R, Mendez I, Banerjee D, Kaski JC, Cubero J, Cruz JM,. The reno-protective effect of hydration with sodium bicarbonate plus N-acetylcysteine in patients undergoing emergency percutaneous coronary intervention: The RENO Study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007; 49: 1283-1288. (Pubitemid 46467227)
25. Stone GW, McLaurin BT, Cox DA, et al. Bivalirudin for patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med 2006; 355: 2203-2216. (Pubitemid 44791162)
26. Claessen BE, Kikkert WJ, Engstrom AE, et al. Primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST elevation myocardial infarction in octogenarians; Trends and Outcomes. Heart 2010; 96: 843-847.
27. Grines C,; On behalf of SENIOR PAMI investigators. A prospective randomized trial of primary angioplasty and thrombolytic therapy in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction. Paper presented at Trans Catheter Therapeutics, Washington, DC, October 16-21, 2005.
28. Bueno H,. Primary angioplasty versus fibrinolysis in the very elderly: The TRIANA study. Presented at ESC Congress 2009, Barcelona, Spain, August 31, 2009.