Tax Policies and Residential Mobility

International Real Estate Review

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 95-117

  Stohs, Mark Hoven ^a   Childs, Paul ^b   Stevenson, Simon ^c  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

Author keywords

California; Real Estate Tax; Residential Mobility; Unintended effect

Indexed keywords

EID: 79953038459     PISSN: 21548919     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.53383/100031     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Amundsen, E. (1985), Moving Costs and the Microeconomics of Intra-Urban Mobility, Regional Science and Urban Economics, 15, 573-583.
2. The Assessor of the County of Sacramento, Web Site address: http://www.co.sacramento.ca.us/assessor/prop60qa.html
3. Boehm, T. P., H.W. Herzog, Jr. and A.M. Schlottmann (1991), Intra-Urban Mobility, Migration, and Tenure Choice, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 73, 59-68.
4. Bradbury, K.L., C.J. Mayer, and K.E. Case (2001), Property Tax Limits, Local Fiscal Behavior and Property Values: Evidence from Massachusetts under Proposition 2½, Journal of Public Economics, 80, 287-312.
5. Cutler, D.M., D.W. Elmendorf, and R. Zeckhauser (1999), Restraining the Leviathan: Property Tax Limitation in Massachusetts, Journal of Public Economics, 71, 313-334.
6. de Soto, Hernando (2001), The Mystery of Capital: Why Capitalism Triumphs in the West and Fails Everywhere Else, Basic Books.
7. Dye, R., and T.J. McGuire (1997), The Effect of Property Tax Limitation Measures on Local Government Fiscal Behavior, Journal of Public Economics, 66, 469-487.
8. Englund, P. (1985), Taxation of Capital Gains on Owner-Occupied Homes: Accrual versus Realization, European Economic Review, 27, 311-334.
9. Englund, P. (1986). Transaction Costs, Capital Gains Tax and Housing Demand, Journal of Urban Economics, 20, 274-290.
10. Figlio, D.N. (1998), Short-Term, Effects of a 1990s-Era Property Tax Limit: Panel Evidence on Oregon’s Measure 5, National Tax Journal, 51, 55-69.
11. Fischel, W.A. (1989), Did Serrano Cause Proposition 13? National Tax Journal, 42, 465-473.
12. Gu, A.Y., and J.W. Trefzger (2000), Make it Simple and Light: Some Thoughts on Real Estate Related Taxation in China, International Real Estate Review, 3, 1, 142-161.
13. Henderson, J.V., and Y.M. Ioannides (1989), Dynamic Aspects of Consumer Decisions in Housing Markets, Journal of Urban Economics, 26, 212-230.
14. Kiel, K. (1994), The Impact of House Price Appreciation on Household Mobility, Journal of Housing Economics, 3, 92-108.
15. Mieszkowski, P., and G.R. Zodrow (1989), Taxation and the Tiebout Model: The Differential Effects of Head Taxes, Taxes on Land Rent and Property Taxes, Journal of Economic Literature, 27, 1098-1146.
16. Long, L. (1992), Change Residence: Comparative Perspectives on its Relationship to Age, Sex and Marital Status, Population Studies, 46, 141-58.
17. Nagy, J. (1997), Did Proposition 13 Affect the Mobility of California Homeowners? Public Finance Review, 25, 102-116.
18. O’Sullivan, A., T.A. Sexton, and S.M. Sheffrin (1995a), Property Taxes, Mobility and Home Ownership, Journal of Urban Economics, 37, 107-129.
19. O’Sullivan, A., T.A. Sexton, and S.M. Sheffrin (1995b), Property Taxes and Tax Revolts: The Legacy of Proposition 13, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20. Potepan, M.J. (1989), Interest Rates, Income and Home Improvement Decisions, Journal of Urban Economics, 25, 282-294.
21. Poterba, J., and K. Rueben (1995), The Effect of Property Tax Limits on Wages and Employment in the Local Public Sector, American Economic Review, 85, 384-389.
22. Preston, A.E., and C. Ichniowski (1991), A National Perspective on the Nature and Effects of the Local Property Tax Revolt, 1976-1986, National Tax Journal, 44, 123-145.
23. Quigley, J.M. (1987), Interest Rate Variations, Mortgage Prepayments and Household Mobility, Review of Economics and Statistics, 69, 636-643.
24. Quigley, J.M. (2001), Homeowner Mobility and Mortgage Interest Rates: New Evidence from the 1990s, paper presented at the Lusk Center Research Symposium, University of Southern California.
25. Quigley, J.M., and D. Weinberg (1977), Intraurban Metropolitan Residential Mobility: Review and Synthesis, International Regional Science Review, 2, 41-66.
26. Sandefur, G.D., and W.J. Scott (1981), A Dynamic Analysis of Migration: An Assessment of the Effects of Age, Family and Career Variables, Demography, 18, 355-65.
27. South, S.J., and G.D. Deane (1993), Race and Residential Mobility: Individual Determinants and Structural Constraints, Social Forces, 72, 147-68.
28. Weiss and Weissman, San Francisco, California, Web Site address: http://marcw.best.vwh.net/prop60.