Breeding dispersal strategies following reproductive failure explain low apparent survival of immigrant Temminck's stints

Oikos

Volumn 120, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 615-622

  Pakanen, Veli Matti ^a   Hildén, Olavi ^b   Rönkä, Antti ^a   Belda, Eduardo J ^b   Luukkonen, Aappo ^a   Kvist, Laura ^a   Koivula, Kari ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OULU   (Finland)

^b UNIVERSITAT POLITÈCNICA DE VALÈNCIA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; DATA SET; DISPERSAL; EMIGRATION; ENVIRONMENTAL CUE; FITNESS; HETEROGENEITY; HYPOTHESIS TESTING; IMMIGRANT; MARK-RECAPTURE METHOD; NEST PREDATION; PHILOPATRY; POPULATION DECLINE; RECRUITMENT (POPULATION DYNAMICS); REPRODUCTIVE COST; REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGY; REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS; SITE FIDELITY; SURVIVAL; WADER;

ANIMALIA; CALIDRIS TEMMINCKII;

EID: 79953023111     PISSN: 00301299     EISSN: 16000706     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2010.18953.x     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Aragón P. et al. 2006. Dispersal status dependent response to the social environment in the common lizard, Lacerta vivipara. Funct. Ecol. 20: 900-907.
2. Bélichon S. et al. 1996. Are there differences in fitness components between philopatric and dispersing individuals? Acta Oecol. 17: 503-517.
3. Boulinier T. et al. 2008. Public information affects breeding dispersal in a colonial bird: kittiwakes cue on neighbours. Biol. Lett. 4: 538-540.
4. Bowler D. E. and Benton T. G. 2005. Causes and consequences of animal dispersal strategies: relating individual behaviour to spatial dynamics. Biol. Rev. 80: 205-225.
5. Breiehagen T. 1989. Nesting biology and mating system in an alpine population of Temminck's stint Calidris temminckii. Ibis 131: 389-402.
6. Burnham K. P. and Anderson D. R. 2002. Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. - Springer.
7. Clobert J. et al. 2001. Dispersal. - Oxford Univ. Press.
8. Clobert J. et al. 2008. Evolution of dispersal. - In: Danchin E. et al. (eds), Behavioural ecology. Oxford Univ. Press, pp. 125-147.
9. Clobert J. et al. 2009. Informed dispersal, heterogeneity in animal dispersal syndromes and the dynamics of spatially structured populations. Ecol. Lett. 12: 197-209.
10. Daniels S. J. and Walters J. R. 2000. Between-year breeding dispersal in red-cockaded woodpeckers: multiple causes and estimated cost. Ecology 81: 2473-2484.
11. Davis J. M. and Stamps J. A. 2004. The effect of natal experience on habitat preferences. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19: 411-416.
12. Doligez B and Pärt T. 2008. Estimating fitness consequences of dispersal: a road to 'know-where'? Non-random dispersal and the underestimation of dispersers' fitness. J. Anim. Ecol. 77: 1199-1211.
13. Doligez B. et al. 1999. The use of conspecific reproductive success for breeding habitat selection in a non-colonial, hole-nesting species, the collared flycatcher. J. Anim. Ecol. 68: 1193-1206.
14. Doligez B. et al. 2002. Costs of reproduction: assessing responses to brood size manipulation on life-history and behavioural traits using multistate capture-recapture models. J. Appl. Stat. 29: 407-423.
15. Doligez B. et al. 2009. 'Heritability' of dispersal propensity in a patchy population. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 276: 2829-2836.
16. Dufty A. M. et al. 2002. Hormones, developmental plasticity and adaptation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17: 190-196.
17. Hansson B. et al. 2003. Heritability of dispersal in the great reed warbler. Ecol. Lett. 6: 290-294.
18. Hildén O. 1975. Breeding system of Temminck's stints Calidris temminckii. Ornis Fenn. 52: 118-144.
19. Hildén O. 1978. Population dynamics in Temminck's stint Calidris temminckii. Oikos 30: 17-28.
20. Hildén O. 1979. Territoriality and site tenacity of Temminck's stint Calidris temminckii. Ornis Fenn. 56: 56-74.
21. Hines J. E. and Sauer J. R. 1989. Program CONTRAST - a general program for the analysis of several survival or recovery rate estimates. Fish Wildlife Tech. Rep. 24: 1-7.
22. Hoover J. P. 2003. Decision rules for site fidelity in a migratory bird, the prothonotary warbler. Ecology 84: 416-430.
23. Koivula K. and Rönkä A. 1998. Habitat deterioration and efficiency of antipredator strategy in meadow-breeding wader, Temminck's stint (Calidris temminckii). Oecologia 116: 348-355.
24. Koivula K. et al. 2008. Steep past and future population decline in an arctic wader: dynamics and viability of Baltic Temminck's stints (Calidris temminckii). J. Avian Biol. 39: 329-340.
25. Lebreton J.-D. et al. 1992. Modelling survival and testing biological hypothesis using marked animals: a unified approach with case studies. Ecol. Monogr. 62: 67-118.
26. Lemel J.-Y. et al. 1997. The evolution of dispersal in a two-patch system: some consequences of differences between migrants and residents. Evol. Ecol. 11: 613-629.
27. Lima S. L. 2009. Predators and the breeding bird: behavioural and reproductive flexibility under the risk of predation. Biol. Rev. 84: 485-513.
28. MacDonald M. A. and Bolton M. 2008. Predation on wader nests in Europe. Ibis 150: 54-73.
29. Marr A. B. et al. 2002. Heterosis and outbreeding depression in descendants of natural immigrants to an inbred population of song sparrows (Melospiza melodia). Evolution 56: 131-142.
30. Marshall M. R. et al. 2004. Annual survival estimation of migratory songbirds confounded by incomplete breeding site-fidelity: study designs that may help. Anim. Biodiv. Conserv. 27.1: 59-72.
31. Morris W. F. and Doak D. F. 2002. Quantitative conservation biology: the theory and practice of population viability analysis. - Sinauer.
32. Naves L. C. et al. 2006. Breeding performance, mate fidelity, and nest site fidelity in a long-lived seabird: behaving against the current? Oikos 115: 263-276.
33. Nol E. et al. 2010. Natal philopatry and apparent survival of juvenile semipalmated plovers. Wilson J. Ornithol. 122: 23-28.
34. Oring L. W. and Lank D. B. 1984. Breeding area fidelity, natal philopatry and the social systems of sandpipers. - In: Burger J. and Olla B. L. (eds), Shorebirds: breeding behavior and populations. Plenum Press, pp. 125-147.
35. Pakanen V-M. et al. 2010. Impact of dispersal status on estimates of local population growth rates in a Temminck's stint Calidris temminckii population. Oikos 119: 1493-1503.
36. Pasinelli G. et al. 2004. Genetic and environmental influences on natal dispersal distance in a resident bird species. Am. Nat. 164: 660-669.
37. Pasinelli G. et al. 2007. Causes and consequences of philopatry and breeding dispersal in red-backed shrikes. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 61: 1061-1074.
38. Porneluzi P. A. 2003. Prior breeding success affects return rates of territorial male ovenbirds. Condor 105: 73-79.
39. Postma E. and Noordwijk A. J. 2005. Gene flow maintains a large genetic difference in clutch size at a small spatial scale. Nature 433: 65-68.
40. Pradel R. et al. 1997. Capture-recapture survival models taking account of transients. Biometrics 53: 60-72.
41. Ronce O. 2007. How does it feel to be like a rolling stone? Ten questions about dispersal evolution. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 38: 231-253.
42. Rönkä A. 1996. Distribution, status and population trends in the Temminck's stint Calidris temminckii in the Finnish Bothnian Bay. Ornis Fenn. 73: 1-11.
43. Rönkä A. et al. 2006. Increased nest predation in a declining and threatened Temminck's stint Calidris temminckii population. Ibis 148: 55-65.
44. Rönkä A. et al. 2008. Population genetic structure in the Temminck's stint Calidris temminckii, with an emphasis on Fennoscandian populations. Conserv. Genet. 9: 29-37.
45. Sandercock B. K. 2006. Estimation of demographic parameters from live encounter data: a summary review. J. Wildlife Manage. 70: 1504-1520.
46. Schaub M. and von Hirschheydt J. 2009. Effect of current reproduction on apparent survival, breeding dispersal and future reproduction in barn swallows assessed by multistate capture-recapture models. J. Anim. Ecol. 78: 625-635.
47. Schjørring S. et al. 2000. Sex difference in criteria determining fidelity towards breeding sites in the great cormorant. J. Anim. Ecol. 69: 214-223.
48. Stearns S. C. 1992. The evolution of life histories. - Oxford Univ. Press.
49. Switzer P. V. 1993. Site fidelity in predictable and unpredictable habitats. Evol. Ecol. 7: 533-555.
50. Switzer P. V. 1997. Past reproductive success affects future habitat selection. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 40: 307-312.
51. Vikström S. 1999. Ruben Caséns vadar-studier på Rummelön 1956-1967 (in Swedish). - Tryckeri Fram Ab, Vasa, Finland.
52. White G. C. and Burnham K. P. 1999. Program MARK: survival estimation from populations of marked animals. Bird Study 46: 120-139.