Interventions that increase use of Pap tests among ethnic minority women: A meta-analysis

Psycho-Oncology

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 341-351

  Han, Hae Ra ^a   Kim, Jiyun ^b   Lee, Jong Eun ^c   Hedlin, Haley K ^d   Song, Heejung ^d   Song, Youngshin ^a   Kim, Miyong T ^a,d,e  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF NURSING   (United States)

^b Gachon University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

^c Seoul Metropolitan Government Seobuk Hospital   (South Korea)

^d JOHNS HOPKINS BLOOMBERG SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^e JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

ethnic minority; meta analysis; Pap test; women

Indexed keywords

AFRICAN AMERICAN; ARTICLE; ASIAN; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL (TOPIC); COUNSELING; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE ACCESS; HEALTH CARE UTILIZATION; HEALTH EDUCATION; HISPANIC; HUMAN; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; META ANALYSIS; MINORITY GROUP; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PAPANICOLAOU TEST; POSTAL MAIL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC);

FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERVENTION STUDIES; MINORITY GROUPS; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS; VAGINAL SMEARS;

EID: 79953019549     PISSN: 10579249     EISSN: 10991611     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pon.1754     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Trans-HHS Cancer Health Disparities Progress Review Group. Making cancer health disparities history. 2009 Accessed October 19, 2009 from.
2. Miller BA, Kolonel LN, Bernstein L, Young Jr JL, et al,. Racial/Ethnic Patterns of Cancer in the United States 1988-1992. NIH Publication No. 96-4104. National Cancer Institute: Bethesda, MD, 1996.
3. Mills PK, Yang RC, Riordan D,. Cancer incidence in the Hmong in California, 1988-2000. Cancer 2005; 104: 2969-2974. (Pubitemid 41798267)
4. Carey P, Gjerdingen DK,. Follow-up of abnormal Papanicolaou smears among women of different races. J Fam Pract 1993; 37: 583-587. (Pubitemid 24006624)
5. Do TQN. The Incidence and Prevalence of Cervical Cancer in Vietnamese Women (1993-1995): An Analysis of SEER Reported Cases. Virginia Commonwealth University: Richmond, VA, 2005.
6. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for cervical cancer: recommendations and rationale. Am Fam Physician 2003; 67: 1759-1766.
7. American Cancer Society. Cancer Prevention and Early Detection Facts and Figures. American Cancer Society: Atlanta, GA, 2008.
8. National Center for Health Statistics. Health, United States, 2006 with Chartbook on Trends in the Health of Americans. National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Hyattsville, MD, 2006.
9. Stone EG, Morton SC, Hulscher ME, et al,. Interventions that increase use of adult immunization and cancer screening services: a meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 2002; 136: 641-651. (Pubitemid 34462676)
10. Austin SM, Balas EA, Mitchell JA, Ewigman BG,. Effect of physician reminders on preventive care: meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care 1994; 121-124.
11. Shea S, DuMouchel W, Bahamonde L,. A meta-analysis of 16 randomized controlled trials to evaluate computer-based clinical reminder systems for preventive care in the ambulatory setting. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1996; 3: 399-409. (Pubitemid 126445041)
12. Snell JL, Buck EL,. Increasing cancer screening: a meta-analysis. Prev Med 1996; 25: 702-707. (Pubitemid 26392676)
13. Tseng DS, Cox E, Plane MB, Hla KM,. Efficacy of patient letter reminders on cervical cancer screening: a meta-analysis. J Gen Intern Med 2001; 16: 563-568.
14. Forbes C, Jepson R, Martin-Hirsch P,. Interventions targeted at women to encourage the uptake of cervical screening. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2002; 3: CD002834.
15. Legler J, Meissner HI, Coyne C, Breen N, Chollette V, Rimer BK,. The effectiveness of interventions to promote mammography among women with historically lower rates of screening. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2002; 11: 59-71. (Pubitemid 34118314)
16. Burack RC, Gimotty PA, George J, et al,. How reminders given to patients and physicians affected Pap smear use in a health maintenance organization: results of a randomized controlled trial. Cancer 1998; 82: 2391-2400. (Pubitemid 28283446)
17. Jibaja-Weiss ML, Volk RJ, Kingery P, Smith QW, Holcomb JD,. Tailored messages for breast and cervical cancer screening of low-income and minority women using medical records data. Patient Educ Couns 2003; 50: 123-132. (Pubitemid 36627421)
18. Taylor VM, Hislop TG, Jackson JC, et al,. A randomized controlled trial of interventions to promote cervical cancer screening among Chinese women in North America. J Natl Cancer Inst 2002; 94: 670-677. (Pubitemid 34552487)
19. Sackett DL, Haynes RB,. Compliance with therapeutic regimens. John Hopkins University Press: Baltimore, MD, 1976.
20. Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, et al,. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials 1996; 17: 1-12. (Pubitemid 26120810)
21. Cho MK, Bero LA,. Instruments for assessing the quality of drug studies published in the medical literature. J Am Med Assoc 1994; 272: 101-104. (Pubitemid 24206037)
22. Greenland S,. Invited commentary: a critical look at some popular meta-analytic methods. Am J Epidemiol 1994; 140: 290-296.
23. Dignan M, Michielutte R, Blinson K, et al,. Effectiveness of health education to increase screening for cervical cancer among eastern-band Cherokee Indian women in North Carolina. J Natl Cancer Inst 1996; 88: 1670-1676. (Pubitemid 26384814)
24. DerSimonian R, Laird N,. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 1986; 7: 177-188. (Pubitemid 17189972)
25. Light RJ, Pilleme DB,. Summing Up: The Science of Reviewing Research. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA, 1984.
26. Rosenthal R,. Meta-analysis Procedures for Social Research. Sage: Beverly Hills, CA, 1984.
27. Batal H, Biggerstaff S, Dunn T, Mehler PS,. Cervical cancer screening in the urgent care setting. J Gen Intern Med 2000; 15: 389-394. (Pubitemid 30431308)
28. Bird JA, McPhee SJ, Ha NT, Le B, Davis T, Jenkins CN,. Opening pathways to cancer screening for Vietnamese-American women: lay health workers hold a key. Prev Med 1998; 27: 821-829. (Pubitemid 29010850)
29. Campbell MK, Tessaro I, DeVellis B, et al,. Effects of a tailored health promotion program for female blue-collar workers: health works for women. Prev Med 2002; 34: 313-323. (Pubitemid 34969590)
30. Dietrich AJ, Tobin JN, Cassells A, et al,. Telephone care management to improve cancer screening among low-income women: a randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 2006; 144: 563-571. (Pubitemid 46768145)
31. Fang CY, Ma GX, Tan Y, Chi N,. A multifaceted intervention to increase cervical cancer screening among underserved Korean women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2007; 16: 1298-1302. (Pubitemid 46991961)
32. Fernandez-Esquer ME, Espinoza P, Torres I, Ramirez AG, McAlister AL,. A su salud: a quasi-experimental study among Mexican American women. Am J Health Behav 2003; 27: 536-545. (Pubitemid 38146651)
33. Jenkins CN, McPhee SJ, Bird JA, et al,. Effect of a media-led education campaign on breast and cervical cancer screening among Vietnamese-American women. Prev Med 1999; 28: 395-406. (Pubitemid 29370272)
34. Lam TK, McPhee SJ, Mock J, et al,. Encouraging Vietnamese-American women to obtain Pap tests through lay health worker outreach and media education. J Gen Intern Med 2003; 18: 516-524. (Pubitemid 36921018)
35. Mandelblatt J, Traxler M, Lakin P, et al,. A nurse practitioner intervention to increase breast and cervical cancer screening for poor, elderly black women. The Harlem Study Team. J Gen Intern Med 1993; 8: 173-178. (Pubitemid 23131546)
36. Mock J, McPhee SJ, Nguyen T, et al,. Effective lay health worker outreach and media-based education for promoting cervical cancer screening among Vietnamese American women. Am J Public Health 2007; 97: 1693-1700. (Pubitemid 351182336)
37. Moskowitz JM, Kazinets G, Wong JM, Tager IB,. 'Health is strength': a community health education program to improve breast and cervical cancer screening among Korean American Women in Alameda County, California. Cancer Detect Prev 2007; 31: 173-183. (Pubitemid 46680373)
38. Nguyen TT, McPhee SJ, Bui-Tong N, et al,. Community-based participatory research increases cervical cancer screening among Vietnamese-Americans. J Health Care Poor Underserved 2006; 17: 31-54. (Pubitemid 43873453)
39. Paskett ED, Tatum CM, D'Agostino Jr R, et al,. Community-based interventions to improve breast and cervical cancer screening: results of the Forsyth County Cancer Screening (FoCaS) Project. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1999; 8: 453-459. (Pubitemid 29230551)
40. Thompson B, Coronado G, Chen L, Islas I,. Celebremos la salud! a community randomized trial of cancer prevention (United States). Cancer Causes Control 2006; 17: 733-746. (Pubitemid 43668332)
41. Rakowski W, Meissner H, Vernon SW, Breen N, Rimer B, Clark MA,. Correlates of repeat and recent mammography for women ages 45 to 75 in the 2002 to 2003 Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS 2003). Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2006; 15: 2093-2101. (Pubitemid 44877031)
42. Town RJ, Wholey DR, Feldman RD, Burns LR,. Hospital consolidation and racial/income disparities in health insurance coverage. Health Aff (Millwood) 2007; 26: 1170-1180.
43. Suarez L, Roche RA, Pulley LV, Weiss NS, Goldman D, Simpson DM,. Why a peer intervention program for Mexican-American women failed to modify the secular trend in cancer screening. Am J Prev Med 1997; 13: 411-417. (Pubitemid 28006733)
44. Wasserman M, Bender D, Lee SY,. Use of preventive maternal and child health services by Latina women: a review of published intervention studies. Med Care Res Rev 2007; 64: 4-45. (Pubitemid 46072478)
45. Rauscher GH, Hawley ST, Earp JA,. Baseline predictors of initiation vs. maintenance of regular mammography use among rural women. Prev Med 2005; 40: 822-830. (Pubitemid 40591846)
46. Learmonth AM,. Utilizing research in practice and generating evidence from practice. Health Educ Res 2000; 15: 743-756.
47. Corbie-Smith G, Ammerman AS, Katz ML, et al,. Trust, benefit, satisfaction, and burden: a randomized controlled trial to reduce cancer risk through African-American churches. J Gen Intern Med 2003; 18: 531-541. (Pubitemid 36921020)
48. Metzler MM, Higgins DL, Beeker CG, et al,. Addressing urban health in Detroit, New York City, and Seattle through community-based participatory research partnerships. Am J Public Health 2003; 93: 803-811. (Pubitemid 38175852)
49. Schulz AJ, Israel BA, Parker EA, Lockett M, Hill Y, Wills R,. The East Side Village Health Worker Partnership: integrating research with action to reduce health disparities. Public Health Rep 2001; 116: 548-557. (Pubitemid 34976045)
50. Garbers S, Chiasson MA,. Inadequate functional health literacy in Spanish as a barrier to cervical cancer screening among immigrant Latinas in New York City. Prev Chronic Dis 2004; 1: A07.
51. Natale-Pereira A, Marks J, Vega M, Mouzon D, Hudson SV, Salas-Lopez D,. Barriers and facilitators for colorectal cancer screening practices in the Latino community: perspectives from community leaders. Cancer Control 2008; 15: 157-165.
52. Larkey LK, Lopez AM, Minnal A, Gonzalez J,. Storytelling for promoting colorectal cancer screening among underserved Latina women: a randomized pilot study. Cancer Control 2009; 16: 79-87.
53. Conn VS, Valentine JC, Cooper HM, Rantz MJ,. Grey literature in meta-analyses. Nurs Res 2003; 52: 256-261.