Know your data: Understanding implicit usage versus explicit action in video content classification

Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering

Volumn 7881, Issue , 2011, Pages

  Yew, Jude ^a   Shamma, David A ^a  

^a YAHOO RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

Categorization; Classification; Naive Bayes; Social; Video; YouTube

Indexed keywords

CATEGORIZATION; CLASSIFICATION; NAIVE BAYES; SOCIAL; VIDEO; YOUTUBE;

ALGORITHMS; BAYESIAN NETWORKS; FORECASTING; MOBILE DEVICES; PORTABLE EQUIPMENT; VIDEO RECORDING; WEBSITES;

METADATA;

EID: 79953008448     PISSN: 0277786X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1117/12.878807     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Roach, M. and Mason, J., "Recent trends in video analysis: A taxonomy of video classification problems," in [In Proceedings of the International Conference on Internet and Multimedia Systems and Applications, IASTED], 348-354 (2002).
2. Shamma, D. A., Shaw, R., Shafton, P. L., and Liu, Y., "Watch what i watch: using community activity to understand content," in [MIR '07: Proceedings of the international workshop on Workshop on multimedia information retrieval], 275-284, ACM, New York, NY, USA (2007).
3. Crane, R. and Sornette, D., "Viral, quality, and junk videos on youtube: Separating content from noise in an information-rich environment," in [Proc. of AAAI symposium on Social Information Processing, Menlo Park, CA], (2008).
4. Wesler, H. T., Smith, M., Fisher, D., and Gleave, E., "Distilling digital traces: Computational social science approaches to studying the internet," in [The Sage handbook of online research methods], Fielding, N., Lee, R. M., and Blank, G., eds., 116 - 140, Sage, London (2008).
5. Surowiecki, J., [The Wisdom of Crowds], Anchor (August 2005).
6. Segaran, T., [Programming Collective Intelligence: Building Smart Web 2.0 Applications], O'Reilly Media, 1 ed. (August 2007).
7. Szabo, G. and Huberman, B. A., "Predicting the popularity of online content," Commun. ACM 53(8), 80-88 (2010).
8. Larsen, K., "Generalized naive bayes classifiers," SIGKDD Explor. Newsl. 7(1), 76-81 (2005).
9. Lowd, D. and Domingos, P., "Naive bayes models for probability estimation," in [ICML '05: Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on Machine learning], 529-536, ACM, New York, NY, USA (2005). (Pubitemid 43183375)
10. Caruana, R. and Mizil, A. N., "An empirical comparison of supervised learning algorithms," in [ICML '06: Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on Machine learning], 161-168, ACM, New York, NY, USA (2006).
11. Domingos, P. and Pazzani, M., "On the optimality of the simple bayesian classifier under zero-one loss," Mach. Learn. 29(2-3), 103-130 (1997). (Pubitemid 127510035)
12. Rish, I., Hellerstein, J., and Jayram, T. S., "An analysis of data characteristics that affect naive Bayes performance," Tech. Rep. RC21993, IBM (2001).
13. Herlocker, J., Konstan, J., and Riedl, J., "Explaining collaborative filtering recommendations," in [ACM 2000 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work], 241-250, Association of Computing Machinery, Association of Computing Machinery (12/2000 2000).
14. Arceneaux, K., "The remix as cultural critique: The urban contemporary music video," Popular Music and Society 16(3), 109-124 (1992).
15. Bowker, G. C. and Star, S. L., [Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences], Inside technology, The MIT Press (October 1999).