Implementing the public participation principle into water management in the Czech Republic: A critical analysis;La mise en oeuvre du principe de la participation du public dans la gestion de l'eau en République tchèque: Une analyse critique

Regional Studies

Volumn 45, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 545-557

  Slavíková, Lenka ^a   Jílkova, Jiřina ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ECONOMICS   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

Directive Czech Republic; Public participation; Water Framework; Water management

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; EUROPEAN UNION; LOCAL PARTICIPATION; STAKEHOLDER; WATER MANAGEMENT;

CZECH REPUBLIC;

EID: 79953005691     PISSN: 00343404     EISSN: 13600591     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00343400903380390     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. ABELSON J. and GAUVIN F. (2006) Assessing the Impacts of Public Participation: Concepts, Evidence and Policy Implications. Research Report Number P 06 (Public Involvement Network). Canadian Policy Research Networks (CPRN), Ottawa, ON (available at: http://www.cprn.com/documents/42669_fr.pdf) (accessed on 4 November 2008).
2. ADGERW. N., BROWN K., FAIRBRASS J., JORDAN A., PAAVOLA J., ROSENDO S. and SEYFANG G. (2003) Towards a thick analysis of environmental decisions, Environment and Planning A 35, 1095-1110.
3. ANDERSSON K. and OSTROM E. (2008) Analyzing decentralized natural resource governance from a polycentric perspective, Policy Sciences 41, 1-23.
4. BEIERLE T. C. (1999) Using social goals to evaluate public participation in environmental decisions, Policy Studies Review 16, 75-103.
5. BROMLEY D. W. (1989) Economic Interests and Institutions: The Conceptual Foundation of Public Policy. Blackwell, Oxford.
6. BROMLEY D. W. (1991) Environment and Economy: Property Rights and Public Policy. Blackwell, Cambridge, MA.
7. ČAMROVÁ L. and JÍLKOVÁ J. (2006) Povodňové škody a nástroje k jejich snížení. University of Economics, Prague.
8. CHAVE P. (2001) Rámcová směrnice vodní politiky. Ministerstvo zemědělství ČR a IWA (Ministry of Agriculture of the Czech Republic/IWA Publ.), Prague (available at: http://www.mze.cz/attachments/peter_chave.pdf) (accessed on 2 January 2008).
9. CONLEY A. and MOOTE M. A. (2003) Evaluating collaborative natural resource management, Society and Natural Resources 16, 371-386.
10. CONNICK S. and INNES J. E. (2003) Outcomes of collaborative water policy making: applying complexity thinking to evaluation, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 46, 177-197.
11. EUROPEAN COMMISSION (2000) Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy [Water Framework Directive], Official Journal of the European Communities L 327, 1-72.
12. EUROPEAN COMMISSION (2003) Guidance Document No. 8. Public Participation in Relation to the Water Framework Directive. Common Implementation Strategy for the Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC). European Commission, Brussels (available at: http://circa.europa.eu/Public/irc/env/wfd/library?l=/framework_directive /guidance_documents/guidancesnos 8spublicspar/_EN_1.0_&a=d) (accessed on 5 April 2008).
13. GOVERNMENT OF THE CZECH REPUBLIC (2007) The Plan of Main River Basins of the Czech Republic. Government of the Czech Republic, Prague (available at: http://www.mze.cz/attachments/PHP_anglicky_web.pdf).
14. HOOGHE L. and MARKS G. (2003) Unraveling the central state, but how? Types of multi-level governance, American Political Science Review 97, 233-243.
15. IREAS, INSTITUTE FOR STRUCTURAL POLICY (2008) Lidé a voda v oblasti povodí Dyje. Project Number OP RLZ CZ.04.1.03/ 3.3.11.4/3378. IREAS, Institute for Structural Policy, Prague (available at: http://www.ireas.cz/elearning/_docs/PJK.pdf) (accessed on 6 June 2008).
16. JANSSEN M. A., ANDERIES J. M. and OSTROM E. (2007) Robustness of social-ecological systems to spatial and temporal variability, Society and Natural Resources 20, 307-322.
17. JORDAN A. (2008) The governance of sustainable development: taking stock and looking forwards, Environmental Planning C: Government and Planning 26, 17-33.
18. KASTENS B. and NEWIG J. (2008) Will participation foster the successful implementation of the Water Framework Directive? The case of agricultural groundwater protection in Northwest Germany, Local Environment 13, 27-41.
19. KNIGHT J. (1992) Institutions and Social Conflict. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
20. KOONTZ T. M. (2006) Collaboration for sustainability? A framework for analyzing government impacts in collaborative environmental management, Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy 2, 15-24.
21. KOONTZ T. M. and JOHNSON E. M. (2004) One size does not fit all: matching breadth of stakeholder participation to watershed group accomplishments, Policy Sciences 37, 185-204.
22. LANZ K. and SCHEUER S. (2000) Příručka EEB o vodohospodářské politice EU podle Rámcové směrnice o vodě. Centrum pro otázky životního prostředí UK a Společnost pro trvale udržitelnýrozvoj, Prague (available at: http://www.czp.cuni.cz/Info/EU/ Voda/) (accessed on 2 January 2008).
23. LEACH W. D. (2006) Collaborative public management and democracy: evidence from Western watershed partnerships, Public Administration Review December, 100-110.
24. MATULA S. (1998) Institucionální rámec vodního hospodářství v České republice. Česká zemědělská univerzita, Prague.
25. MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE OF THE CZECH REPUBLIC (2003) Metodickýnávod odboru vodohospodářské politiky Ministerstva zemědělství a odboru ochrany vod Ministerstva ž ivotního prostředío úpravě postupu při plánování v oblasti vod v roce 2004. Ministry of Agriculture, Prague (available at: http://www.mze.cz/attachments/metodicky_navod.pdf) (accessed on 20 May 2008).
26. MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE OF THE CZECH REPUBLIC (2005) Metodickýnávod odboru vodohospodářské politiky Ministerstva zemědělství a odboru ochrany vod Ministerstva životního prostředí pro postup pořizovatelůplánůoblastí povodí a dalších subjektůpodílejících se na procesu plánování v oblasti vod v roce 2005. Ministry of Agriculture, Prague (available at: http://www.mze.cz/attachments/Metodicky_ navod_plan_2005.pdf) (accessed on 20 May 2008).
27. MOSS T. (2008) Solving Problems of 'Fit' at the Expense of Problems of 'Interplay'? The Spatial Reorganisation ofWater Management following the EU Water Framework Directive (Draft). Institute for Regional Development and Structural Planning, Erkner (available at: http://www.irs-net.de/workpaper3.htm) (accessed on 3 January 2008).
28. MURO M. (2006) Pilothafte Ermittlung und Analyse von Zielgruppen für die Information und Anhörung der Ö ffentlichkeit nach Art. 14 EG Wasserrahmenrichtlinie in einer Flussgebietseinheit. Umweltbundesamt, Texte No. 27/06. TU Berlin, Berlin (available at: http:// www.landschaftsoekonomie.tu-berlin.de/fileadmin/a0731/uploads/publikatio nen/edocuments/UBA_Texte_27-06.pdf) (accessed on 2 January 2008).
29. OSTROM E. (2006) Governing the Commons-The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY.
30. OSTROM E. (2008) Institutions and the environment, Economic Affairs 28(3), 24-31.
31. PAAVOLA J. (2007) Institutions and environmental governance: a reconceptualization, Ecological Economics 63, 93-103.
32. PAAVOLA J. and ADGERW. N. (2005) Institutional ecological economics, Ecological Economics 53, 353-368.
33. POVODÍ MORAVY (2006) Plánování v oblasti vod: Už ívání vod a jeho vliv na stav vod. Povodí Moravy, Brno (available at: http://www. pmo.cz/2006/Dyje/uzivani_vod_Dy.pdf) (accessed on 11 May 2008).
34. POVODÍ MORAVY (2008) Strategie zapojení veřejnosti a už ivatelůvody do procesu plánování pro oblast povodí Dyje. Povodí Moravy, Brno (available at: http://www.pmo.cz/2005/Strategie/Dyje/Strategie_D.doc) (accessed on 11 May 2008).
35. PRISCOLI J. D. (2004) What is public participation in water resources management and why is it important?, Water International 29, 221-227.
36. RASCHE K., KRYWKOW J., NEWIG J. and HARE M. (2006) Assessing the Intensity of Participation Along Six Dimensions. The Macaulay Land Use Research Institute, Aberdeen (available at: http://www.macaulay.ac.uk/PATHconference/outputs/PATH_ abstract_3.3.3.pdf) (accessed on 4 November 2008).
37. RAUSCHMAYER F. and WITTMER H. (2006) Evaluating deliberative and analytical methods for the resolution of environmental conflicts, Land Use Policy 23, 108-122.
38. ROWE G. and FREWER L. J. (2000) Public participation methods: a framework for evaluation, Science, Technology, and Human Values 25, 3-29.
39. ROWE G. and FREWER L. J. (2004) Evaluating public-participation exercises: a research agenda, Science, Technology, and Human Values 29, 512-556.
40. ROWE G., HORLICK-JONES T.,WALLS J., POORTINGA W. and PIDGEON N. F. (2008) Analysis of a normative framework for evaluating public engagement exercises: reliability, validity and limitations, Public Understanding of Science 17, 419-441.
41. SHORT CH. and WINTER M. (1999) The problem of common land: towards stakeholder governance, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 42, 613-630.
42. VIDEIRA N., ANTUNES P., SANTOS R. and LOBO G. (2006) Public and stakeholder participation in European water policy: a critical review of project evaluation processes, European Environment 16, 19-31.
43. WEBLER T., TULER S. and KRUEGER R. (2001) What is good public participation process? Five perspectives from the public, Environmental Management 27, 435-450.
44. WITTMER H., RAUSCHMAYER F. and KLAUER B. (2006) How to select instruments for the resolution of environmental conflicts?, Land Use Policy 23, 1-9.
45. YOUNG H. P. (1994a) Equity: In Theory and Practice. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
46. YOUNG O. R. (1994b) International Governance: Protecting the Environment in Stateless Society. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.
47. YOUNG O. R. (2002) The Institutional Dimensions of Environmental Change-Fit, Interplay and Scale. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.