Outcomes of nonemergent percutaneous coronary intervention with and without on-site surgical backup: A meta-analysis

American Journal of Therapeutics

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2011, Pages

  Singh, Param Puneet ^a   Singh, Mukesh ^a   Bedi, Updesh Singh ^a   Adigopula, Sasikanth ^a   Singh, Sarabjeet ^a   Kodumuri, Vamsi ^a   Molnar, Janos ^a   Ahmed, Aziz ^a   Arora, Rohit ^a   Khosla, Sandeep ^a  

^a ROSALIND FRANKLIN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE AND SCIENCE   (United States)

Author keywords

onsite backup surgery; percutaneous coronary intervention

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COCHRANE LIBRARY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; ELECTIVE SURGERY; EMBASE; EMERGENCY SURGERY; HEART INFARCTION; HUMAN; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDLINE; META ANALYSIS; MORTALITY; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ANGIOPLASTY, BALLOON, CORONARY; CARDIAC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS; EMERGENCIES; HOSPITAL MORTALITY; HUMANS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES;

EID: 79953003105     PISSN: 10752765     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/MJT.0b013e3181bc0f5a     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Gruntzig AR, Senning A, Siegenthaler WE. Nonoperative dilatation of coronary-artery stenosis: percutaneous trans-luminal coronary angioplasty. N Engl J Med. 1979;301: 61-68. (Pubitemid 9229695)
2. Yang EH, Gumina RJ, Lennon RJ, et al. Emergency coronary artery bypass surgery for percutaneous coro-nary interventions: changes in the incidence, clinical characteristics, and indications from 1979 to 2003. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46:2004-2009. (Pubitemid 41713582)
3. Seshadri N, Whitlow PL, Acharya N, et al. Emergency coronary artery bypass surgery in the contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention era. Circulation. 2002; 106:2346-2350. (Pubitemid 35244736)
4. Maier W, Windecker S, Boersma E, et al. Evolution of percutaneous coronary angioplasty in Europe from 1992-1996. Eur Heart J. 2001;22:1733-1740. (Pubitemid 32898667)
5. Vogt A, Bonzel T, Harmajanz D, et al. PTCA registry of German community hospitals. Eur Heart J. 1997;18:1110-1114. (Pubitemid 27271882)
6. Smith SC Jr, Feldman TE, Hirshfeld JW Jr, et al. ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 Guideline Update for Percutane-ous Coronary Intervention\Summary Article: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines (ACC/AHA/SCAI Writing Committee to Update the 2001 Guidelines for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention). Circulation. 2006;47:216-235. (Pubitemid 43005194)
7. Dehmer GJ, Kutcher MA, Dey SK, et al; on behalf of ACC-NCDR. Frequency of percutaneous coronary inter-ventions at facilities without onsite cardiac surgical backup\a report from the American College of Cardi-ology-National Cardiovascular Data registry (ACC-NCDR). Am J Cardiol. 2007;99:329-332. (Pubitemid 46149551)
8. Dehmer GJ, Blankenship J, Wharton TP Jr, et al. The current status and future direction of percutaneous coronary interventions without onsite cardiac surgical backup: an expert consensus document from the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2007;69:471-478. (Pubitemid 46363845)
9. Moher D, Cook DJ, Eastwood S, Olkin I, et al. Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. Quality of reporting of meta-analyses. Lancet. 1999;354: 1896-1900.
10. Dellawalle A, Steffenino G, Rbichini F, et al. Elective coronary angioplasty with and without surgical standby: clinical and angiographic criteria for selection of patients. Coron Artery Dis. 1995;6:513-520.
11. Melberg T, Nilsen D, Larsen AI, et al. Nonemergent coronary angioplasty without on-site surgical backup: a randomized study evaluating outcomes in low-risk patients. Am Heart J. 2006;152:888-895. (Pubitemid 44632952)
12. Frutkin AD, Mehta SK, Patel T, et al. Outcomes of 1,090 consecutive, elective, nonselected percutaneous coronary interventions at a community hospital without onsite cardiac surgery Am J Cardiol. 2008;101:53-57. (Pubitemid 350297199)
13. Ting HH, Raveendran G, Lennon RJ, et al. A total of 1,007 percutaneous coronary interventions without on-site cardiac surgery: acute and long-term outcomes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47:1713-1721.
14. Williams DO, Riley RS, Singh AK, et al. Restoration of normal coronary hemodynamics and myocardial metab-olism after percutaneous transluminal coronary angio-plasty. Circulation. 1980;62:653-656. (Pubitemid 10059082)
15. Grassman ED, Johnson SA, Krone RJ. Predictors of success and major complications for primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction: an analysis of the 1990 to 1994 Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interven-tions registries. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;30:201-208. (Pubitemid 27357147)
16. Klinke WP, Hui W. Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty without on-site surgical facilities. Am J Cardiol. 1992;70:1520-1525. (Pubitemid 23006062)
17. Meier B, Urban P, Dorsaz PA, et al. Surgical standby for coronary balloon angioplasty. JAMA. 1992;268:741-745.
18. Iniguez A, Macaya C, Hernandez R, et al. Comparison of results of percutaneous transluminal coronary angio-plasty with and without selective requirement of surgical standby Am J Cardiol. 1992;69:1161-1165.
19. Surgical cover for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: the Council of the British Cardiovascular Intervention Society. Br Heart J. 1992;68:339-341.
20. Sowton E, de Bono D, Gribbin B, et al. Coronary angioplasty in the United Kingdom. Br Heart J. 1991;66: 325-331.
21. Smith SC Jr, Feldman TE, Hirshfeld JW Jr, et al. ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 guideline update for percutane-ous coronary intervention: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/SCAI Writing Committee to Update the 2001 Guidelines for Percuta-neous Coronary Intervention). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47: e1-e121. (Pubitemid 43005195)
22. Williams DO, Holubkov R, Yeh W, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention in the current era compared with 1985-1986: the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Registries. Circulation. 2000;102:2945-2951.
23. Shaw RE, Anderson HV, Brindis RG, et al. Development of a risk adjustment mortality model using the American College of Cardiology-National Cardiovascular Data Registry (ACCNCDR) experience: 1998-2000. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;39:1104-1112. (Pubitemid 34267411)
24. Hasdai D, Berger PB, Bell MR, et al. The changing face of coronary interventional practice: the Mayo Clinic expe-rience. Arch Intern Med. 1997;157:677-682. (Pubitemid 27133198)
25. Altmann DB, Racz M, Battleman DS, et al. Reduction in angioplasty complications after the introduction of coronary stents: results from a consecutive series of 2242 patients. Am Heart J. 1996;132:503-507. (Pubitemid 26347752)
26. Stauffer JC, Eeckhout E, Vogt P, et al. Standby versus stent-by during percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Am Heart J. 1995;130:21-26.
27. Andreasen JJ, Mortensen PE, Andersen LI, et al. Emergency coronary artery bypass surgery after failed percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Scand Cardiovasc J. 2000;34:242-246.
28. Shubrooks SJ Jr, Nesto RW, Leeman D. Urgent coronary bypass surgery for failed percutaneous coronary in-tervention in the stent era: is backup still necessary? Am Heart J. 2001;142:190-196. (Pubitemid 32595393)
29. Eagle KA, Guyton RA, Davidoff R, et al. ACC/AHA 2004 guideline update for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: summary article. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Update the 1999 Guidelines for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;44:1146-1310.
30. Berger PB, Stensrud PE, Daly RC, et al. Time to reperfusion and other procedural characteristics of emergency coro-nary artery bypass surgery after unsuccessful coronary angioplasty Am J Cardiol. 1995;76:565-569.
31. Beyersdorf F, Mitrev Z, Sarai K, et al. Changing patterns of patients undergoing emergency surgical revasculari-zation for acute coronary occlusion: importance of myocardial protection techniques. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1993;106:137-148. (Pubitemid 23216056)
32. Nollert G, Amend J, Detter C, et al. Coronary artery bypass grafting after failed coronary angioplasty: risk factors and longterm results. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1995; 43:35-39.
33. Lazar HL, Faxon DP, Paone G, et al. Changing profiles of failed coronary angioplasty patients: impact on surgical results. Ann Thorac Surg. 1992;53:269-273.
34. Talley JD, Weintraub WS, Roubin GS, et al. Failed elective percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty requir-ing coronary artery bypass surgery: in-hospital and late clinical outcome at 5 years. Circulation. 1990;82:1203-1213.
35. Kutcher MA, Klein LW, Ou FS, et al; on behalf of the National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR). Percuta-neous coronary interventions in facilities without cardiac surgery on site: a report from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;54:16-24.