Assessing the impact of past wapiti introductions into Scottish Highland red deer populations using a Y chromosome marker

Mammalian Biology

Volumn 76, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 640-643

  Perez Espona S ^a,b   Perez Barberia F J ^b   Pemberton, J M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^b SCOTTISH CROP RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cervids; Hybrid; Introgression; Phylogenetics; Sequencing; Zfy

Indexed keywords

DEER; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENETIC MARKER; HUNTING; HYBRID; HYBRIDIZATION; INTRODUCED SPECIES; INTROGRESSION; NATIVE SPECIES; PHYLOGENETICS; RELATEDNESS; UPLAND REGION;

SCOTLAND; UNITED KINGDOM;

CERVIDAE; CERVUS CANADENSIS; CERVUS ELAPHUS; CERVUS ELAPHUS CANADENSIS;

EID: 79952951299     PISSN: 16165047     EISSN: 16181476     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.mambio.2010.10.001     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Asher G.W., Archer J.A., Scott I.C., O'Neill K.T., Ward J., Littlejohn R.P. Reproductive performance of pubertal red deer (Cervus elaphus) hinds: effects of genetic introgression of wapiti subspecies on pregnancy rates at 18 months of age. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2005, 90:287-306.
2. Batcheler C.L., McLennan M.J. Craniometric study of allometry, adaptation and hybridism of red deer (Cervus elaphus scoticus L.) and wapiti (C. e. nelsonii, Bailey) in Fiordland, New Zealand. Proc. N. Z. Ecol. Soc. 1977, 24:57-75.
3. Cathey J.C., Bickham J.W., Patton J.C. Introgressive hybridization and nonconcordant evolutionary history of maternal and paternal lineages in North American deer. Evolution 1998, 52:1224-1229.
4. Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 1985, 39:783-791.
5. Guindon S., Gascuel O. A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Syst. Biol. 2003, 52:696-704.
6. Ludt C.J., Schroeder W., Rottman O., Kuehn R. Mitochondrial DNA phylogeography of red deer (Cervus elaphus). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2004, 3:1064-1083.
7. Moore G.H., Littlejohn R.P. Hybridisation of farmed wapiti (Cervus elaphus manitobensis) and red deer (Cervus elaphus). N. Z. J. Zool. 1989, 16:191-198.
8. Pérez-Espona S., Pérez-Barbería F.J., McLeod J.E., Jiggins C.D., Gordon I.J., Pemberton J.M. Landscape features affect gene flow of Scottish Highland red deer (Cervus elaphus). Mol. Ecol. 2008, 17:981-996.
9. Pérez-Espona S., Pérez-Barbería F.J., Goodall-Copestake W.P., Jiggins C.D., Gordon I.J., Pemberton J.M. Genetic diversity and population structure of Scottish Highland red deer (Cervus elaphus) populations: a mitochondrial survey. Heredity 2009, 102:199-210.
10. Pérez-Espona S., Pemberton J.M., Putman R. Red and sika deer in the British Isles, current management issues and management policy. Mamm. Biol. 2009, 74:247-262.
11. Pérez-Espona S., Pérez-Barbería F.J., Goodall-Copestake W.P., Jiggins C.D., Gordon I.J., Pemberton J.M. Variable extent of sex-biased dispersal in a strongly polygynous mammal. Mol. Ecol. 2010, 19:3101-3113.
12. Pitra C., Fickel J., Meijaard E., Groves P.C. Evolution and phylogeny of old world deer. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2004, 33:880-895.
13. Posada D. jModelTest: phylogenetic model averaging. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2008, 25:1253-1256.
14. Shaw C.N., Wilson P.J., White B.N. A reliable molecular method of gender determination for mammals. J. Mammal. 2003, 84:123-128.
15. Swofford D.L. PAUP (Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony), Version 4.0b10 2002, Sinauer Associates, Sunderland.
16. Whitehead G.K. The Deer Stalking Grounds of Great Britain and Ireland 1960, Hollis and Carter, London.
17. Whitehead G.K. The Deer of Great Britain and Ireland 1964, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.
18. Winans W. Deer Breeding for Fine Heads 1913, Rowland Ward, London.
19. Zwickl, D.J., 2006. Genetic algorithm approaches for the phylogenetic analysis of large biological sequence datasets under the maximum likelihood criterion. Ph.D. Dissertation. The University of Texas at Austin.