Development of an at selection tool using the ICF model

Technology and Disability

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 1-6

  Steel, Emily ^a   Gelderblom, Gert Jan ^a   De Witte, Luc P ^a  

^a ZUYD UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Assistive Technology; framework; ICF; instrument; practitioner; selection; service delivery

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY; BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT; CLASSIFICATION ALGORITHM; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; EVALUATION RESEARCH; HEALTH CARE NEED; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HEALTH CARE UTILIZATION; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMAN; INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF FUNCTIONING, DISABILITY AND HEALTH; INTERVENTION STUDY; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; PROCESS DEVELOPMENT; THEORETICAL MODEL;

EID: 79952942604     PISSN: 10554181     EISSN: 1878643X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3233/TAD-2011-0299     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. S. Arthanat and J. Lenker, Evaluating the ICFas aFramework for Clinical Assessment ofPersons for Assistive Technology Devise Recommendation, 10th North American Collaborating Centre (NACC) Conference on ICF, Halifax, 2004.
2. T. Bernd, D. van der Pijl et al., Existing models and instru-ments for the selection of assistive technology in rehabilita-tion practice, Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy 16(3) (2009), 146-158.
3. M.R. Cohen, W.A. Anthony et al., Assessing and Developing Readiness for Psychiatric Rehabilitation, Psychiatric Services, The American Psychiatric Association 48 (1997), 644-646. (Pubitemid 27208565)
4. L. de Witte, H. Knops et al., (eds), European Service Delivery Systems in Rehabilitation Technology: HEART Line C, Horizontal European Activities in Rehabilitation Technology, Hoensbroek, IRV, 1994
5. EASTIN, European Assistive Technology Information Network, 1 February 2010. from http://www.eastin.info/.
6. D.L. Edyburn and R.O. Smith, Creating an Assistive Technology Outcomes Measurement System: Validating the components, Assistive Technology Outcomes and Benefits 1(1) (2004), 8-15
7. EUSTATConsortium, Critical Factors involved in End-Users' Education in relation to Assistive Technology, Empowering USers Through Assistive Technology, EUSTAT Consortium, 1998.
8. A. Friederich, T Bernd et al., Methods for the selection of assistive technology in neurological rehabilitation practice, Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy (2010), Posted online 7 December 2009.
9. M. J. Fuhrer, J.W. Jutai et al., A framework for the conceptual modelling of assistive technology device outcomes, Disability andRehabilitation 25(22) (2003), 1243-1251.
10. C Hocking, Function orfeelings: factors in abandonment of assistive devices, Technology andDisability 11 (1999), 3-11 (Pubitemid 30142446)
11. International Organisation for Standardisation, International Standard ISO 9999: Assistive products for persons with disability-Classification and terminology, Fourth edition, Geneva, ISO Copyright Office, 2007.
12. J.W. Jutai, M.J. Fuhrer et al., Toward a Taxonomy of Assistive Technology Device Outcomes, American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 84(4) (2005), 294-302. (Pubitemid 40389071)
13. J. Lenker and J. Jutai, Assistive Technology Outcomes Research and Clinical Practice: What Role for ICF? 8th North American Collaborating Center Conference on ICF, Toronto, 2002.
14. M.A. Roelands, P. van Oost et al., A Social-Cognitive Model to Predict the Use of Assistive Devices for Mobility and SelfCare in Elderly People, The Gerontologist 42 (2002), 39-50. (Pubitemid 34142168)
15. M. Scherer, J. Jutai et al., A framework for modelling the selection of assistive technology devices (ATDs), Disability andRehabilitation: Assistive Technology 2(1) (2007), 1-8.
16. M. Scherer, C Sax et al., Predictors of assistive technology use: The importance of personal and psychosocial factors, Disability andRehabilitation 27(21) (2005), 1321-1331. (Pubitemid 41823742)
17. M.J. Scherer and G. Craddock, Matching Person and Technology (MPT) assessment process, Technology and Disability 14(3) (2002), 125-131. (Pubitemid 35282507)
18. W. A. Steiner, L. Ryser et al., Use of the ICF model as a clinical problem-solving tool in physical therapy and rehabilitation medicine, Physical Therapy 82(11) (2002), 1098-1107. (Pubitemid 35315669)
19. R. Wessels, J. Persson et al., IPPA: Individually Prioritised Problem Assessment, Technology andDisability 14(3) (2002), 141-145. (Pubitemid 35282509)
20. World Health Organisation, International classification of functioning, disability and health: ICF, Geneva, World Health Organisation, 2001.