Misuse of automation: The impact of system experience on complacency and automation bias in interaction with automated aids

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society

Volumn 1, Issue , 2010, Pages 374-378

  Reichenbach, Juliane ^a   Onnasch, Linda ^a   Manzey, Dietrich ^a  

^a TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATION BIAS; AUTOMATION FAILURES; FAULT IDENTIFICATIONS; SUBJECTIVE TRUST; SUPERVISORY CONTROL; SYSTEM INFORMATION;

ERGONOMICS; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION;

AUTOMATION;

EID: 79952940112     PISSN: 10711813     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1518/107118110X12829369201872     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (12)

1. Bahner, J.E., Hueper, A.C., & Manzey, D. (2008a). Misuse of automated decision aids: Complacency, automation bias, and the impact of training experiences. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 66, 688-699.
2. Bahner, J.E., Elepfandt, M. & Manzey. D. (2008b). Misuse of Diagnostic Aids in Process Control: The Effects of Automation Misses on Complacency and Automation Bias. Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. Santa Monica: HFES.
3. Duley, J.A., Westerman, S., Molloy, R., & Parasuraman, R. (1997). Effects of display superimposition on monitoring of automation. Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology (pp. 322-328). Columbus, OH: ISAP.
4. Hart, S. G., & Staveland, L. E. (1988). Development of a multi-dimensional workload rating scale: Results of empirical and theoretical research. In P. A. Hancock & N. Meshkati (Eds.), Human menial workload (pp.139-183). Amsterdam. The Netherlands: Elsevier.
5. Lee, J., & Moray, N. (1992). Trust, control strategies and allocation of function in human-machine systems. Ergonomics, 35, 1243-1270.
6. Luedtke, A. & Moebus, C. (2005). A case study for using a cognitive model of learned carelessness in cognitive engineering. In G. Salvendy (Ed.), Proc. of the 11th International Conference of Human-Computer Interaction. Mahwah: Erlbaum.
7. Manzey, D., Reichenbach, J., & Onnasch, L. (2008). Performance consequences of automated aids in process control: The impact of function allocation. Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Hitman Factors and Ergonomics Society. Santa Monica: HFES.
8. Manzey, D. Bleil, M., Bahner-Heyne, J.E., Klostermann, A., Onnasch, L., Reiehenbach, J. & Röttger, S. (2008). AutoCAMS 2.0. Manual. Available from www.aio.tu-berlin.de/?id=30492 [19 February 2009].
9. Mosier, K. L. & Skitka, L. J. (1996). Human decision makers and automated decision aids: Made for each other? In R. Parasuraman, & M. Mouloua (Eds.), Automation and Human Performance: Theory and Applications (pp. 201-220). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
10. Parasuraman, R. & Riley, V. (1997). Humans and automation: Use, misuse, disuse, abuse. Human Factors, 39, 230-259.
11. Parasuraman, R., Molloy, R. & Singh, I.L. (1993). Performance consequences of automation induced "complacency". The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 2, 1-23.
12. Skitka, L.J., Mosier, K.L., Burdick, M. (1999). Does automation bias decision-making? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 51, 991-1006. (Pubitemid 30509730)