Dual-use review policies of biomedical research journals

Biosecurity and Bioterrorism

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 49-54

  Resnik, David B ^a   Barner, Dionne D ^a   Dinse, Gregg E ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL WARFARE; CRIME; MEDICAL RESEARCH; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PEER REVIEW; PUBLICATION; PUBLISHING; STATISTICS;

BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; BIOTERRORISM; CRIME; EDITORIAL POLICIES; PEER REVIEW, RESEARCH; PERIODICALS AS TOPIC; SECURITY MEASURES;

EID: 79952938807     PISSN: 15387135     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/bsp.2010.0067     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. National Research Council. Biotechnology Research in the Age of Terrorism. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2004.
2. Atlas RM. National security and the biological research community. Science 2002;298:753-754. (Pubitemid 35231512)
3. Atlas RM, Dando M. The dual-use dilemma for the life sciences: perspectives, conundrums, and global solutions. Biosecur Bioterror 2006;4:276-286. (Pubitemid 44526073)
4. National Research Council. Globalization, Biosecurity and the Future of the Life Sciences. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2006.
5. Resnik DB, Shamoo A. Bioterrorism and the responsible conduct of research. Drug Develop Res 2005;63:121-133.
6. van Aken J, Hunger I. Biosecurity policies at international life science journals. Biosecur Bioterror 2009;7:61-71.
7. Resnik DB, Patrone D, Peddada S. Research misconduct policies of social science journals and impact factor. Account Res 2010;17:79-84.
8. Sheehan K. E-mail response rates: a review. J Comput Mediat Commun 2001; 6(2). http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol6/issue2/sheehan.html. Accessed October 15, 2010.