Disability and orientation-specific performance during a reciprocal tapping task

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society

Volumn 1, Issue , 2010, Pages 581-585

  Irwin, C B ^a   Duff, S N ^a   Skye, J L ^a   Wiegmann, D A ^a   Sesto, M E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BUILDING DESIGN; DWELL TIME; INTERFACE POSITION; MOTOR CONTROL; MOTOR CONTROL SYSTEM; PUBLIC BUILDINGS; PUBLIC SPACE; TOUCH SCREEN; UPPER EXTREMITY; USER PERFORMANCE;

EXPERIMENTS; FASTENERS; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; PUBLIC WORKS; USER INTERFACES; WHEELCHAIRS;

ERGONOMICS;

EID: 79952935714     PISSN: 10711813     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1518/107118110X12829369603885     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Americans With Disabilities Act Standards for Accessible Design. In: publication USDoJ (ed), last amended July, 1994.
2. Christe B, Burkhard PR, Pcgna AJ, Mayer E, Hauert CA. Clinical assessment of motor function: A processes oriented instrument based on a speed-accuracy trade-off paradigm. Behavioural Neurology. 2007; 18:19-29. (Pubitemid 46333651)
3. Colle HA, Hiszem K.J. Standing at a kiosk: Effects of key size and spacing on touch screen numeric keypad performance and user preference. Ergonomics. 2004; 47:1406-1423. (Pubitemid 39368985)
4. Irwin C, Meyer, RH, Yen, TY, Kelso, DP, Sesto, ME. Use of a touch screen and force plate system to quantify touch characteristics during a timed reciprocal tapping test. Rehabilitation Engineering & Assistive Technology Society of North America. Arlington, VA, 2008.
5. Irwin C, Sesto, ME. Timing and accuracy of individuals with and without motor control disabilities completing a touch screen task. Human Computer Interaction International Conference. San Diego, CA, 2009.
6. Irwin C, Yen, TY, Meyer, RH, Vanderheiden, GC, Kelso, DP, Sesto, ME. Use of force plate instrumentation to assess kinetic variables during touch screen use. Universal Access in the Information Society. In Press.
7. Jin ZX, Piocher, T., Kiff, L. Touch screen user interfaces for older adults: button size and spacing. In: Stephanidis C (ed). Universal Access in Human Computer Interaction Coping with Diversity: Springer Berlin / Heidelberg, 2007.
8. Lundyekman L, Ivry R, Keele S, Woollacott M. Timing and force control deficits in clumsy children. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 1991; 3:367-376.
9. Paquet V, Feathers D. An anthropometric study of manual and powered wheelchair users. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics. 2004; 33:191-204. (Pubitemid 38199974)
10. Piek JP, Skinner RA. Timing and force control during a sequential tapping task in children with and without motor coordination problems. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 1999; 5:320-329. (Pubitemid 29292199)
11. Rohr LE. Upper and lower limb reciprocal tapping: Evidence for gender biases. Journal of Motor Behavior. 2006; 38:15-17. (Pubitemid 43132578)
12. Smits-Engelsman BCM, Rameckers EAA, Duysens J. Children with congenital spastic hemiplegia obey Fitts' Law in a visually guided tapping task. Experimental Brain Research. 2007; 177:431-439. (Pubitemid 46339599)
13. Steenbergen B, Veringa A, de Haan A, Hulstijn W. Manual dexterity and keyboard use in spastic hemiparesis: a comparison between the impaired hand and the 'good' hand on a number of performance measures. Clinical rehabilitation. 1998; 12:64-72.
14. van Roon D, Steenbergen B, Hulstijn W. Reciprocal tapping in spastic hemiparesis. Clinical rehabilitation. 2000; 14:592-600.
15. Williams HG, Woollacott MH, Ivry R. Timing and motor control in clumsy children. Journal of Motor Behavior. 1992; 24:165-172.