Do younger and older adults differentially depend on an automated system?

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society

Volumn 1, Issue , 2010, Pages 175-179

  McBride, Sara E ^a   Rogers, Wendy A ^a   Fisk, Arthur D ^a  

^a GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGE-RELATED CHANGES; AUTOMATED SYSTEMS; DUAL-TASKS; ERROR TYPES; HUMAN-AUTOMATION INTERACTIONS; OLDER ADULTS; PROCESSING SPEED; SYSTEM RELIABILITY; WORKING MEMORIES;

ERGONOMICS;

AUTOMATION;

EID: 79952930730     PISSN: 10711813     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1518/107118110X12829369200233     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (6)

1. Hart, S. G. & Staveland, L. E. (1988). Development of NASA-TLX (task load index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. In P. A. Hancock & N. Meshkati (Eds.), Human mental workload (pp. 139-183). North-Holland: Elsevier Science.
2. Ho, G., Wheatley, D., & Scialfa, C. T. (2005). Age differences in trust and reliance of a medication management system. Interacting with Computers, 17(6), 690-710. (Pubitemid 41586119)
3. Johnson, J. D. (2004). Type of automation failure: the effects on trust and reliance in automation. Unpublished master's thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia.
4. Kramer, A., & Madden, D. (2008). Attention. In F.I.M. Craik & T.A. Salthouse (Eds.), The handbook of aging and cognition (3rd ed.) (pp. 189-249). New York, NY US: Psychology Press.
5. Mayer, A. K. (2008). The manipulation of user expectancies: Effects on reliance, compliance, and trust using an automated system. Unpublished master's thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia.
6. Parasuraman, R., & Mouloua, M. (Eds.) (1996). Automation and Human Performance: Theory and Applications. Mawah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates