A methodology for supporting "transfer" in biomimetic design

Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing: AIEDAM

Volumn 24, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 483-505

  Sartori, Julian ^a   Pal, Ujjwal ^b   Chakrabarti, Amaresh ^b  

^a HOCHSCHULE BREMEN   (Germany)

^b INDIAN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE   (India)

Author keywords

Biomimetics; Databases; Design Process; Functionality; Transfer

Indexed keywords

ABSTRACT LEVELS; BIOMIMETIC DESIGN; BIOMIMETIC PROCESS; COMPLEX BIOLOGICAL SYSTEMS; CONCEPT GENERATION; DATABASES; DESIGN PERFORMANCE; DESIGN PROCESS; FUNCTIONALITY; LEVEL OF ABSTRACTION; LEVELS OF ABSTRACTION; PHYSICAL EFFECTS; TECHNICAL SYSTEMS; TRANSFER;

ABSTRACTING; BIOLOGICAL SYSTEMS; DATABASE SYSTEMS; DESIGN; SAPPHIRE;

BIOMIMETICS;

EID: 79952918824     PISSN: 08900604     EISSN: 14691760     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0890060410000351     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Barthlott, W., & Neinhuis, C. (1997). Purity of the sacred lotus, or escape from contamination in biological surfaces. Planta 202(1), 1-8. (Pubitemid 27201419)
2. Chakrabarti, A., Sarkar, P., Leelavathamma, B., & Nataraju, B. S. (2005). A functional representation for aiding biomimetic and artificial inspiration of new ideas. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 19(2), 113-132. (Pubitemid 43797419)
3. Chakrabarti, A., & Taura, T. (2006). Computational support of synthesis and analysis of behaviourof artefacts using physical effects: some challenges. Proc. 9th Int. Design Conf., DESIGN 2006, pp. 1-8.
4. Chiu, I., & Shu, L. H. (2007). Biomimetic designthrough natural language analysis to facilitate cross-domain information retrieval. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 21(1), 45-59. (Pubitemid 46748186)
5. DaimlerChrysler. (2005). DaimlerChrysler Hightech Report 2005, pp. 58-63. Accessed at http://www.daimlerchrysler.com/Projects/c2c/channel/documents/ 783295-Gone-Fishin.pdf
6. Gramann, J. (2004). Problemmodelle und Bionik als Methode. PhD Thesis. Technical University Munich.
7. Helms, M. E., Vattam, S. S., & Goel, A. K. (2009). Biologically inspired design: process and products. Design Studies 30(5), 606-622.
8. Hill, B. (1997). Innovationsquelle Natur: Naturorientierte Innovationsstrategie für Entwickler, Konstrukteure und Designer. Aachen, Germany: Shaker.
9. Hill, B. (2005). Goal setting through contradiction analysis in the bionicsoriented construction process. Creativity and Innovation Management 14(1), 59-65. (Pubitemid 40344989)
10. Kesel, A., & Liedert, R. (2007). Learning from nature: non-toxic biofouling control by shark skin effect. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology 146 A (Suppl. 1), 130.
11. Korzybski, A. (1933). A non-Aristotelian system and its necessity for rigour in mathematics and physics. Science and Sanity [n. v.], 747-761.
12. Mann, D. (2001). System operator tutorial-9-windows on the world. TRIZ Journal. Accessed at http://www.triz-journal.com/archives/2001/09/c/index.htm on April 20, 2010.
13. Mattheck, C., & Bethge, K. (1998). The structural optimization of trees. Naturwissenschaften 85(1), 1-10. (Pubitemid 28083888)
14. Mayer, G. (2005). Rigid biological systems as models for synthetic composites. Science 310, 1144-1147. (Pubitemid 41681733)
15. Milwich, M., Speck, T., Speck, O., Stegmaier, T., & Planck, H. (2006). Biomimetics and technical textiles: solving engineering problems with the help of nature's wisdom. American Journal of Botany 93(10), 1455-1465. (Pubitemid 44654551)
16. Nachtigall, W. (2002). Bionik: Grundlagen und Beispiele für Ingenieure und Naturwissenschaftler. Berlin: Springer.
17. Nachtigall, W., & Bluechel, K. G. (2000). Das große Buch der Bionik. Stuttgart: DVA.
18. Pahl, G., & Beitz, W. (1996). Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach. New York: Springer.
19. Rodenacker, W. (1976). Methodisches Konstruieren. Berlin: Springer.
20. Sachs, L., & Hedderich, J. (2006). Angewandte Statistik, 12th ed. Berlin: Springer.
21. Schild, K., Herstatt, C., & Lüthje, C. (2004). How to use Analogies for Breakthrough Innovations. Hamburg: Technical University of Hamburg, Institute of Technology and Innovation Management.
22. Schmidt, J. C. (2005). Bionik und Interdisziplinarität. Wege zu einer bionischen Zirkulationstheorie der Interdisziplinarität. In Bionik. Aktuelle Forschungsergebnisse aus Natur-, Ingenieur-und Geisteswissenschaften (Rossmann, T., & Tropea, C., Eds.), pp. 219-246. Berlin: Springer.
23. Srinivasan, V., & Chakrabarti, A. (2009). An empirical evaluation of novelty-SAPPhIRE relationship. ASME 2009 Int. Design Engineering Technical Conf. Computers and Information in Engineering Conf., IDETC/CIE, San Diego, CA, August 30-September 2.
24. Suhr, S. H., Song, Y. S., Lee, S. J., & Sitti, M. (2005). Biologically inspired miniature water strider robot. Proc. Robotics: Science and Systems I, pp. 42-48. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
25. Terninko, J., Zusman, A., & Zlotin, B. (1998). Systematic Innovation. An introduction to TRIZ (Theory of Inventive Problem Solving). Boca Raton, FL: St. Lucie Press.
26. Turner, J. S. (2001). On the mound of macrotermes michaelseni as an organ of respiratory gas exchange. Physiological and Biochemical Zoology 74(6), 798-822. (Pubitemid 34018110)
27. Vattam, S. S., Helms, M. E., & Goel, A. K. (2008). Compound analogical design: interaction between problem decomposition and analogical transfer in biologically inspired design. Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. Design Computing and Cognition, pp. 377-396. Berlin: Springer.
28. Vincent, J. F. V., Bogatyreva, O. A., Bogatyrev, N. R., Bowyer, A., & Pahl, A. K. (2006). Biomimetics: its practice and theory. Journal of the Royal Society: Interface 3(9), 471-482. (Pubitemid 44265152)
29. Vogel, S., Ellington, C. P., & Kilgore, D. L. (1973). Wind-induced ventilation of the burrow of the prairie-dog, Cynomys ludovicianus. Journal of Comparative Physiology 85 A (1), 1-14.