Evaluation of optimal sensor placement techniques for parameter identification in buildings

Mathematical and Computational Applications

Volumn 16, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 456-466

  Gündeş Bakir, Pelin ^a  

^a ISTANBUL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Fisher information matrix; Modal testing; Multistory buildings; Optimal sensor placement; System identification

Indexed keywords

CIVIL ENGINEERS; COMPUTATIONAL EFFORT; DRIVING POINTS; EFFECTIVE INDEPENDENCE; IN-BUILDINGS; MODAL TESTINGS; MULTISTORY BUILDING; OPTIMAL SENSOR PLACEMENT; PARAMETER IDENTIFICATION; SENSOR CONFIGURATIONS; SENSOR DISTRIBUTIONS; SYSTEM IDENTIFICATION;

IDENTIFICATION (CONTROL SYSTEMS); MODAL ANALYSIS; OPTIMIZATION; SENSORS; SINGULAR VALUE DECOMPOSITION; TALL BUILDINGS;

FISHER INFORMATION MATRIX;

EID: 79952913271     PISSN: 1300686X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. 1Kammer D.C. Sensor placement for on-orbit modal identification and correlation of large space structures. Journal of Guidance Control and Dynamics, 14(2):251-59, 1991.
2. Kammer D.C. and Jensen B.M. and Mason D.R. Test-analysis correlation of the space shuttle solid rocket motor center segment. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 26(4):266-73, 1989.
3. Kincaid R.K. and Padula S.L. D-optimal designs for sensor and actuator locations. Computers and Operations Research, 29(6):701-13, 2002. (Pubitemid 34099413)
4. Naimimohasses DM, Barnet DM and Smith PR. Sensor optimization using neural network sensitivity measures. Measurement Science and Technology, 6:1291-300, 1995.
5. Oh DY and No HC. Determination of the minimal number and optimal sensor location in a nuclear system with fixed incore detectors. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 152:197-212, 1994.
6. Meo M and Zumpano G. On the optimal sensor placement techniques for a bridge structure. Engineering Structures, 27:1488-97, 2005. (Pubitemid 40876280)
7. Li DS and Li HN and Fritzen CP. The connection between effective independence and modal kinetic energy methods for sensor placement. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 305:945-955, 2007. (Pubitemid 47069464)
8. Celep Z. and Kumbasar N. Earthquake engineering and earthquake resistant design of structures (in Turkish). Beta Publishing, Turkey, 2004.
9. Celep. Z. Reinforced Concrete Structures (in Turkish). Beta Publishing, Turkey, 2009.
10. The language of technical computing MATLAB. Available at: http://www.mathworks.com, version 7.10.246, release 14.0, the mathworks. 2005.
11. Imamovic N. Model validation of large finite element model using test data. PhD thesis, Imperial College, London, UK, 1998.
12. Doebling SW. Measurement of structural flexibility matrices for experiments with incomplete reciprocity. PhD thesis, Colorado University, http://sdel.colorado.edu/Publications/1995/Theses/Doebling-PhD.pdf, USA, 1996.
13. Kim H.B. and Park Y.S. Sensor placement guide for structural joint stiffness model improvement. Mechanical System and Signal Processing, 11(5):651-72, 1997. (Pubitemid 127402812)
14. Kammer DC. Sensor set expansion for modal vibration testing. Mechanical systems and signal processing, 19(4):700-716, 2005.
15. Kammer D.C. and Tinker M.L. Optimal placement of triaxial accelerometers for modal vibration tests. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 18:29-41, 2004.
16. Middleton D. An introduction to statistical communication theory. McGraw-Hill, New York, USA, 1960.
17. Allemang R. J. and Brown D. L. A correlation coefficient for modal vector analysis. In Proceedings of IMAC I: 1st International Modal Analysis Conference, pages 110116, Orlando, Florida, 1982.
18. Website of the instrumented building. Available at: www.erenkoy.k12.tr/. 2007.
19. Worden K and Burrows AP, Optimal sensor placement for fault detection. Engineering Structures, 23:885-901, 2001. (Pubitemid 32548427)