Highly efficient size reduction of nanoparticles by the shock wave method

Functional Materials Letters

Volumn 3, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 299-302

  Wang, Wei ^a   Zhang, Qi ^b   Liu, Zhengxun ^a   Libor, Zsuzsanna ^b  

^a NANJING UNIVERSITY OF AERONAUTICS AND ASTRONAUTICS   (China)

^b CRANFIELD UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Nanoparticle; PZT; shock wave; size reduction

Indexed keywords

AVERAGE PARTICLE SIZE; AVERAGE SIZE; CRYSTALLINE STRUCTURE; EFFICIENT METHOD; HIGH INTENSITY FOCUSED ULTRASOUND; HYDROTHERMAL METHODS; LEAD ZIRCONATE TITANATE PARTICLES; MORPHOLOGY AND SIZE; NONLINEAR EFFECT; PZT; SIZE REDUCTION; SIZE REDUCTIONS; TEM; ULTRASONIC CAVITATION; WAVE METHOD; WORKING PRINCIPLES;

NANOPARTICLES; SEMICONDUCTING LEAD COMPOUNDS; SIZE DETERMINATION; TRANSMISSION ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; ULTRASONIC TESTING; ULTRASONICS; WAVES; X RAY DIFFRACTION;

SHOCK WAVES;

EID: 79952912491     PISSN: 17936047     EISSN: 17937213     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1142/S1793604710001445     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. J. Schäfer, et al., J. Mater. Res. 12, 2518(1997).
2. C. Liu et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 123, 4344(2001).
3. R. Ramesh et al., Mater. Sci. Eng. R: Reports 32, 191(2001).
4. E. K. Akdogan et al., J. Appl. Phys. 97, 084305(2005).
5. J. Windle and B. Derby, J. Mater. Sci. Lett. 18, 87(1999).
6. D. L. Corker et al., J. Euro. Cer. Soc. 22, 383(2002).
7. A. Blana et al., Urology 63, 297(2004).
8. J. F. Scott, Ferroelectrics 314, 207(2005).
9. J. F. Scott et al., Ferroelectrics 336, 237(2006).
10. S. A. Wilson et al., Mater. Sci. Eng. R: Reports 56, 1(2007).
11. B. Jaffe et al., J. Appl. Phys. 25, 809(1954).
12. Y. Deng et al., Mater. Lett. 57, 1675(2003).
13. A. Amin et al., Phys. Rev. B 34, 1595(1986).
14. C. Sauter et al., Ultrason. Sonochem. 15, 517(2008).
15. B. K. Novikov et al., Nonlinear Underwater Acoustics (Amer. Inst. of Phys., New York, 1987).