Clinically low-risk prostate cancer: Evaluation with transrectal doppler ultrasound and functional magnetic resonance imaging

Clinics

Volumn 66, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 27-34

  Novis, Maria Inês ^a   Baroni, Ronaldo Hueb ^a   Cerri, Luciana Mendes de Oliveira ^a   Mattedi, Romulo Loss ^a   Buchpiguel, Carlos Alberto ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Cancer staging; Doppler Ultrasound; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy; Prostatic neoplasm; Ultrasonography

Indexed keywords

EID: 79952912402     PISSN: 18075932     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/S1807-59322011000100006     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. O'Donnell H, Parker C. What is low-risk prostate cancer and what is its natural history? World J Urol. 2008;26:415-22.
2. Damber JE, Aus G. Prostate cancer. Lancet. 2008;371:1710-21, doi: 10. 1016/S0140-6736(08)60729-1.
3. Sartor AO, Hricak H, Wheeler TM, Coleman J, Penson DF, Carroll PR, et al. Evaluating localized prostate cancer and identifying candidates for focal therapy. Urology. 2008;72(6 Suppl):12-24, doi: 10.1016/j.urology. 2008.10.004.
4. Cooperberg MR, Lubeck DP, Meng MV, Mehta SS, Carrol PR. The changing face of low-risk prostate cancer: trends in clinical presentation and primary management. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:2141-9, doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.10.062.
5. d'Amico AV, Whittington R, Malkowicz SB, Schultz D, Blank K, Broderick GA, et al. Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy, or interstitial radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer. JAMA. 1998;280:969-74, doi: 10.1001/jama.280.11.969.
6. Steyerberg EW, Roobol MJ, Kattan MW, van der Kwast TH, Koning HJ, Schröder FH. Prediction of indolent prostate cancer: validation and updating of a prognostic nomogram. J Urol. 2007; 177:107-12.
7. Shukla-Dave A, Hricak H and Scardino PT. Imaging low-risk prostate cancer. Curr Opin Urol. 2008;18:78-86, doi: 10.1097/MOU. 0b013e3282f13adc.
8. Bloch BN, Furman-Haran E, Helbich TH, Lenkinski RE, Degani H, Kratzik C, et al. Prostate cancer: accurate determination of extracapsular extension with high-spatial-resolution dynamic contrast-enhanced and T2-weighted MR imaging-initial results. Radiology. 2007;245:176-85, doi: 10.1148/radiol.2451061502.
9. Yu KK, Hricak H, Alagappan R, Chernoff DM, Bacchetti P, Zaloudek CJ. Detection of extracapsular extension of prostate carcinoma with endorectal and phased-array coil MR imaging: multivariate feature analysis. Radiology. 1997;202:697-702.
10. Sala E, Akin O, Moskowitz CS, Eisenberg HF, Kuroiwa K, Ishill NM, et al. Endorectal MR imaging in the evaluation of seminal vesicle invasion: diagnostic accuracy and multivariate feature analysis. Radiology. 2006;238:929-37, doi: 10.1148/radiol.2383050657.
11. Jung JA, Coakley FV, Vigneron DB, Swanson MG, Qayyum A, Weinberg V, et al. Prostate depiction at endorectal MR spectroscopic imaging: investigation of a standardized evaluation system. Radiology. 2004;33:701-8, doi: 10.1148/radiol.2333030672.
12. Harnden P, Naylor B, Shelley MD, Clements H, Coles B, Mason MD. The clinical management of patients with a small volume of prostatic cancer on biopsy: what are the risks of progression? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer. 2008;112:971-81, doi: 10.1002/cncr.23277.
13. Kirkham AP, Emberton M, Allen C. How good is MRI at detecting and characterising cancer within the prostate? Eur Urol. 2006; 50:1163-74, doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2006.06.025.
14. Westphalen AC, Coakley FV, Qayyum A, Swanson M, Simko JP, Lu Y, et al. Peripheral zone prostate cancer: accuracy of different interpretative approaches with MR and MR spectroscopic imaging. Radiology. 2008; 246:177-84, doi: 10.1148/radiol.2453062042.
15. Weinreb JC, Blume JD, Coakley FV, Wheeler TM, Cormack JB, Sotto CK, et al. Prostate Cancer: Sextant Localization at MR Imaging and MR Spectroscopic Imaging before Prostatectomy-Results of ACRIN Prospective Multi-institutional Clinicopathologic Study. Radiology. 2009;251:122-33, doi: 10.1148/radiol.2511080409.
16. Wang L, Hricak H, Kattan MW, Chen HN, Scardino PT, Kuroiwa K. Prediction of Organ-confined Prostate Cancer: Incremental Value of MR Imaging and MR Spectroscopic Imaging to Staging Nomograms. Radiology. 2006;238:597-603, doi: 10.1148/radiol.2382041905.
17. Jackson ASN, Reinsberg SA, Sohaib SA, Charles-Edward EM, Jhavar S, Christmas TJ. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for prostate cancer localization. Br J Radiol. 2009;82:148-56.
18. Engelbrecht MR, Jager GJ, Laheij RJ, Verbeek ALM, van Lier HJ, Barentsz JO. Local staging of prostate cancer using magnetic resonance imaging: a meta-analysis. Eur Radiol. 2002;12:2294-302.
19. Wang L, Mullerad M, Chen HN, Eberhardt SC, Kattan MW, Scardino PT, et al: Prostate Cancer: incremental value of endorectal MR imaging findings for prediction of extracapsular extension. Radiology. 2004;232:133-9, doi: 10.1148/radiol.2321031086.
20. Puech P, Huglo D, Petyt G, Lemaitre L, Villers A. Imaging of organ-confined prostate cancer: functional ultrasound, MRI and PET/computed tomography. Curr Opin Urol. 2009;19:168-76, doi: 10.1097/MOU.0b013e328323f5ed.
21. Cookson MS, Fleshner NE, Soloway SM, Fair WR. Correlation between Gleason score of needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimen: accuracy and clinical implications. J Urol. 1997;157:559-62.
22. Djavan B, Kadesky K, Klopukh B, Marberger M, Roehrborn CG. Gleason scores from prostate biopsies obtained with 18-gauge biopsy needles poorly predict Gleason scores of radical prostatectomy specimens. Eur Urol. 1998;33:261-70, doi: 10.1159/000019578.
23. Kvale R, Moller B, Wahlqvist R, Fossa SD, Berner A, Busch C, et al. Concordance between Gleason scores of needle biopsies and radical prostatectomy specimens: a population-based study. BJU Int. 2009;103: 1647-54, doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.08255.x.
24. Köksal IT, Ozcan F, Kadioglu TC, Esen T, Kiliçaslan I, Tunç M. Discrepancy between Gleason scores of biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens. Eur Urol. 2000;37:670-4, doi: 10.1159/000020216.
25. Cam K, Yucel S, Turkeri L, Akdas A. Accuracy of transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy: histopathological correlation to matched prostatectomy specimens. Int J Urol. 2002;9:257-60.
26. Lotan TL, Epstein JI. Clinical implications of changing definitions within the Gleason grading system. Nat. Rev. Urol. 2010;7:136-42, doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2010.9.