AFLP, ISSR, and SSR polymorphisms are in accordance with botanical and cultivated plant taxonomies of the highly polymorphic cucurbita pepo

Acta Horticulturae

Volumn 634, Issue , 2004, Pages 167-173

  Paris, H S ^a   Portnoy, V ^a   Mozes Daube, N ^a   Tzuri, G ^a   Katzir, N ^a   Yonash, N ^a  

^a VOLCANI CENTER   (Israel)

Author keywords

Cultivar groups; Diversity; Gourd; Pumpkin; Squash; Subspecies

Indexed keywords

EID: 79952898863     PISSN: 05677572     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2004.634.20     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Andres, T.C. 1987. Cucurbita fraterna, the closest wild relative and progenitor of C. pepo. Cucurbit Genet. Coop. Rep. 10:69-71.
2. Buntjer, J.B. 2000. Phylogenetic Computer Tools, Version 1.2. Wageningen University, The Netherlands.
3. Decker, D.S. 1988. Origin(s), evolution, and systematics of Cucurbita pepo (Cucurbitaceae). Econ. Bot. 42:4-15.
4. Duchesne, A.N. 1786. Essai sur l'histoire naturelle des courges. Panckoucke, Paris.
5. Felsenstein, J. 1993. PHYLIP (Phylogeny Inference Package), Version 3.5c. Department of Genetics, University of Washington, Seattle.
6. Greuter, W., McNeill, J., Barrie, F.R., Burdet, H.M., Demoulin, V., Filgueiras, T.S., Nicolson, D.H., Silva, P.C., Skog, J.E., Trehane, P., Turland, N.J. and Hawksworth, D.L. 2000. International Code of Botanical Nomenclature (Saint Louis Code) adopted by the Sixteenth International Botanical Congress St. Louis, Missouri, July-August 1999. Regnum Veg. 138.
7. Katzir, N., Tadmor, Y., Tzuri, G., Leshzeshen, E., Mozes-Daube, N., Danin-Poleg, Y. and Paris, H.S. 2000. Further ISSR and preliminary SSR analysis of relationships among accessions of Cucurbita pepo. Acta Hort. 510:433-439. http://www.actahort.org/books/510/510-69.htm
8. Mantel, N. 1967. The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Res. 27:209-220.
9. Naudin, C. 1856. Nouvelles recherches sur les caractères spécifiques et les variétés des plantes du genre Cucurbita. Ann. Sci. Nat., Bot. IV 6:5-73, 3 pl.
10. Nei, M. and Li, W.H. 1979. Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction endonucleases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 76:5269-5273.
11. Page, R.D.M. 1996. TREEVIEW: An application to display phylogenetic trees on personal computers. Computer Applic. Biosci. 12:357-358.
12. Paris, H.S. 1986. A proposed subspecific classification for Cucurbita pepo. Phytologia 61:133-138.
13. Paris, H.S. 2000. History of the cultivar-groups of Cucurbita pepo. p.71-170. In: J. Janick (ed.), Hort. Rev. 25(2001), Wiley, New York.
14. Paris, H.S. 2001. Characterization of the Cucurbita pepo collection at the Newe Ya'ar Research Center, Israel. Plant Genet. Res. Newsl. 126:41-45.
15. Schneider, S., Excoffier, L., and Roessli, D. 2000. Arlequin software. http://www.lgb.uniger.ch/arlequin
16. Sneath, P.H.A. and Sokal, R.R. 1973. Numerical taxonomy: The principles and practice of numerical classification. W.H. Freeman Co., San Francisco, California.
17. Trehane, P., Brickell, C.D., Baum, B.R., Hetterscheid, W.L.A., Leslie, A.C., McNeill, J., Spongberg, S.A. and Vrugtman, F. 1995. The International Code of Nomenclature for Cultivated Plants -1995. (ICNCP or Cultivated Plant Code), adopted by the International Commission for the Nomenclature of Cultivated Plants. Quarterjack Publishing, Wimborne, UK. (Regnum Veg. 133).
18. Vos, P., Hogers, R., Bleeker, M., Reijans, M., Lee, T. van de, Hornes, M., Frijters, A., Pot, J., Peleman, J., Kuiper, M. and Zabeau, M. 1995. AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting. Nucl. Acids Res. 23:4407-4414.