Vegetation structure: Fine scale relationships with soil in a cerrado site

Flora: Morphology, Distribution, Functional Ecology of Plants

Volumn 206, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 341-346

  Dantas, Vinícius de Lima ^a   Batalha, Marco Antônio ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF SÃO CARLOS   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Organic matter; Savanna; Soil vegetation relationships; Spatial autocorrelation; Species richness

Indexed keywords

AUTOCORRELATION; COMMUNITY COMPOSITION; DOMINANCE; HETEROGENEITY; IDENTIFICATION METHOD; NUMERICAL MODEL; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SHRUB; SOIL ORGANIC MATTER; SOIL TYPE; VEGETATION STRUCTURE; WATER AVAILABILITY;

BRAZIL;

MYRSINE;

EID: 79952819021     PISSN: 03672530     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.flora.2010.11.003     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Amorim P.K., Batalha M.A. Soil characteristics of a hyperseasonal cerrado compared to a seasonal cerrado and a floodplain grassland: implications for plant community structure. Braz. J. Biol. 2006, 66:661-667.
2. Amorim P.K., Batalha M.A. Soil-vegetation relationships in hyperseasonal, seasonal cerrado, and wet grassland in Emas National Park (central Brazil). Acta Oecol. 2007, 32:319-327.
3. Arens, K., 1958. O cerrado como vegetação oligotrófica. Bol. Fac. Fil. Ciênc. Ltr., Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, pp. 59-57.
4. Arens K. As plantas lenhosas dos campos cerrados como vegetação adaptada às deficiências minerais do solo. III Simpósio sobre o cerrado 1963, vol. 1. Edgard Blucher/Edusp, São Paulo, pp. 13-115.
5. Batalha M.A., Mantovani W. Chaves de identificação das espécies vegetais vasculares baseadas em caracteres vegetativos para a ARIE Cerrado Pé-de-Gigante (Santa Rita do Passa Quatro, SP). Rev. Inst. Florest. 1999, 11:137-158.
6. Bertness M.D., Callaway R. Positive interactions in communities. Trends Ecol. Evol. 1994, 5:191-193.
7. Bivand, R., et al., 2009. spdep: Spatial dependence: weighting schemes, statistics and models. R package version 0.4-34. http://cran.r-project.org/package=spdep.
8. Carvalho D.A., Martins F.M. Shrub and tree species composition in the cerrado of southwest Minas Gerais. Cerne 2009, 15:142-154.
9. Carvalho G.H., Cianciaruso M.V., Batalha M.A. Plantminer: a web tool for checking and gathering plant species taxonomic information. Environ. Model. Softw. 2010, 25:815-816.
10. Castro A.A.J.F., Martins F.R., Tamashiro J.Y., Shepherd G.J. How rich is the flora of Brazilian cerrados. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 1999, 86:192-224.
11. Coley P.D., Bryant J.P., Chapin F.S. Resource availability and plant antiherbivore defense. Science 1985, 230:895-899.
12. Dormann C.F., et al. Methods to account for spatial autocorrelation in the analysis of species distributional data: a review. Ecography 2007, 30:609-628.
13. Embrapa Manual de métodos de análise do solo 1997, Embrapa, Rio de Janeiro.
14. Ferreira J.N., Bustamante M.M., da C., Davidson E.A. Linking woody species diversity with plant available water at a landscape scale at a Brazilian savanna. J. Veg. Sci. 2009, 20:826-835.
15. Fortin M.-J., Dale M. Spatial analysis: a guide for ecologists 2005, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
16. Funch L.S., Funch R. Phenology of gallery and montane forest in the Chapada Diamantina, Bahia, Brazil. Biotropica 2002, 34:40-50.
17. Goodland R., Ferri M.G. Ecologia do Cerrado 1979, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo.
18. Goodland R., Pollard R. The Brazilian cerrado vegetation: a fertility gradient. J. Ecol. 1973, 61:219-224.
19. Hubbell S.P. The Unified Neutral Theory of Biodiversity and Biogeography 2001, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
20. Hubbell S.P. Neutral theory in community ecology and the hypothesis of functional equivalence. Funct. Ecol. 2005, 19:166-172.
21. Jongman R.H.G., Ter Braak C.J.F., van Tongeren O.F.R. Data analysis in community and landscape ecology 1995, Cambridge University, Cambridge.
22. Köppen W. Grundriss der Klimakunde 1931, de Gruyter, Berlin.
23. Kulmatisky A., Beard K.H., Stevens J.R., Cobbold S.M. Plant-soil feedbacks: a meta-analytical review. Ecol. Lett. 2008, 11:1-13.
24. MacArthur R.H. Geographical Ecology 1972, Harper & Row, New York.
25. Magurran A.E. Measuring Biological Diversity 2004, Blackwell, Oxford.
26. Mantovani W., Leitão Filho H.F., Martins F.R. Chave baseada em caracteres vegetativos para identificação de espécies lenhosas da Reserva Biológica de Moji Guaçu, SP. Hoehnea 1985, 12:35-66.
27. Marimon B.H., Haridasan M. Comparação da vegetação arbórea e características edáficas de um cerradão e um cerrado sensu stricto em áreas adjacentes sobre solos distróficos no leste do Mato Grosso, Brasil. Acta Bot. Bras. 2005, 19:913-926.
28. Martins S.V., Júnior R.C., Rodrigues R.R., Gandolfi S. Colonisation of gaps produced by death of bamboo clumps in a semideciduos mesophytic forest in south-estern Brazil. Plant Ecol. 2004, 172:121-131.
29. Morran P.A.P. Notes on continuous stochastic phenomena. Biometrika 1950, 37:17-23.
30. Motta P.E.F., Curi N., Franzmeier D.P. Relation of soil and geomorphic surfaces in the Brazilian cerrado. The Cerrados of Brazil: Ecology and Natural History of Neotropical Savannas. 2002, 13-32. Columbia University Press, New York. P.S. Oliveira, R.J. Marquis (Eds.).
31. Myers N., Mittermeier R.A., Mittermeier C.G., Fonseca G.A.B., Kent J. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 2000, 403:853-858.
32. Oksanen, J., et al., 2009. vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package version 1.15-2. http://cran.r-project.org/package=vegan.
33. Oliverira-Filho A.T., Fontes M.A.L. Patters of floristic differentiation among Atlantic Forests in southern Brazil and the influence of climate. Biotropica 2000, 32:793-810.
34. Oliveira-Filho A.T., Ratter J.A. Vegetation physiognomies and woody flora of the cerrado biome. The Cerrados of Brazil: Ecology and Natural History of Neotropical Savannas. 2002, 13-32. Columbia University, New York. P.S. Oliveira, R.J. Marquis (Eds.).
35. Pielou E.C. Ecological Diversity 1975, Wiley, New York.
36. R Development Core Team, 2009. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Wien, R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available via DIALOG. (accessed 21.10.09). http://www.r-project.org/.
37. Raij B., van Quaggio J.A., Cantarella H., Ferreira M.E., Lopes A.S., Bataglia O.C. Análise química do solo para fins de fertilidade 1987, Fundação Cargill, Campinas.
38. Ruggiero P.G.C., Batalha M.A., Pivello V.P., Meirelles S.T. Soil-vegetation relationships in cerrado (Brazilian savana) and semideciduous Forest, Southeastern Brazil. Plant Ecol. 2002, 160:1-16.
39. Salisbury F.B., Ross C.W. Plant Physiology 1991, Wadsworth Publ, Belmont, CA.
40. Sarmiento G. The Ecology of Neotropical Savannas 1984, Harvard University Press, Harvard, MA.
41. Shannon C.E., Weaver W. The Mathematical Theory of Communication 1949, University of Illinois Press, Urbana.
42. Silva F.C. Manual de análises químicas de solos. plantas e fertilizantes 1999, Embrapa, Brasília.
43. Silva D.M., Batalha M.A. Soil-vegetation relationships in cerrados under different fire frequencies. Plant Soil 2008, 311:87-96.
44. Silva I.A., Batalha M.A. Co-occurrence of tree species at fi{ligature}ne spatial scale in a woodland cerrado, southeastern Brazil. Plant Ecol. 2009, 200:277-286.
45. Silva L.C.R., Sternberg L., Haridasan M., Hoffmann W.A., Miralles-Wilhelm F., Franco A.C. Expansion of gallery forest into central Brazilian savannas. Glob. Change Biol. 2008, 14:2108-2118.
46. SMA (Secretaria de Estado do Meio Ambiente) Cerrado: bases para conservação e uso sustentável das áreas de cerrado do estado de São Paulo 1997, SMA, São Paulo.
47. Souza A.F., Martins F.R. Microsite specialization and spatial distribution of Geonoma brevispata, a clonal palm in south-eastern Brazil. Ecol. Res. 2004, 19:521-532.
48. Sparovek G., Camargo O.A. Sampling strategies for tropical forest nutrient cycling studies: a case study in São Paulo. Brazil. Ver. Bras. Ci. Solo 1997, 21:635-642.