Accessing the unsaid: The role of scalar alternatives in children's pragmatic inference

Cognition

Volumn 118, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 84-93

  Barner, David ^a   Brooks, Neon ^b   Bale, Alan ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^c Dept of Electrical and Computer Engineering   (Canada)

Author keywords

Counting; Exactness; Inference; Language acquisition; Pragmatic development; Scalar implicature; Semantic development; Word learning

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHILD; CHILD DEVELOPMENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; KNOWLEDGE; LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT; LEARNING; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; MATHEMATICS; SEMANTICS;

CHILD, PRESCHOOL; HUMANS; LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT; MATHEMATICS; SEMANTICS;

EID: 79952808969     PISSN: 00100277     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.10.010     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Au T.K., Glusman M. The principle of mutual exclusivity in word learning: To honor or not to honor?. Child Development 1990, 61(5):1474-1490.
2. Baldwin D.A. Infants' ability to consult the speaker for clues to word reference. Journal of Child Language 1993, 20:395-418.
3. Barner D., Bachrach A. Inference and exact numerical representation in early language development. Cognitive Psychology 2010, 60:40-62.
4. Barner D., Chow K., Yang S. Finding one's meaning: A test of the relation between quantifiers and integers in language development. Cognitive Psychology 2009, 58:195-219.
5. Barner D., Libenson A., Cheung P., Takasaki M. Cross-linguistic relations between quantifiers and numerals in language acquisition: Evidence from Japanese. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 2009, 103:421-440.
6. Bloom P. How children learn the meanings of words 2000, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
7. Breheny R. A new look at the semantics and pragmatics of numerically quantified noun phrases. Journal of Semantics 2008, 25(2):93-140.
8. Brooks, N., Audet, J., & Barner, D. (in preparation). Pragmatic inference, not semantic competence, guides children's interpretation of unknown number words.
9. Carey S., Bartlett E. Acquiring a single new word. Proceedings of the Stanford child language conference 1978, 15:17-29.
10. Chierchia G., Crain S., Guasti M.T., Gualmini A., Meroni L. The acquisition of disjunction: Evidence for a grammatical view of scalar implicatures. Proceedings of the 25th Boston University conference on language development 2001, 157-168. Cascadilla Press, Somerville, MA. A.H.-J. Do, L. Domingues, A. Johansen (Eds.).
11. Clark, E. (1987). The principle of contrast: A constraint on language acquisition. In B. MacWhinney (Ed.), Mechanisms of language acquisition (pp. 1-33).
12. Clark E.V. On the logic of contrast. Journal of Child Language 1988, 15:317-335.
13. Clark On the pragmatics of contrast. Journal of Child Language 1990, 17:417-431.
14. Condry K.F., Spelke E.S. The development of language and abstract concepts: The case of natural number. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2008, 137:22-38.
15. Crain, S., Goro, T., & Minai, U. (2005). Hidden units in child language. In A. C. Schalley & D. Khlentzos (Eds.), Mental states. Evolution, function, nature (Vol. 1, pp. 275-294). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
16. Diesendruck G. The principles of conventionality and contrast in word learning: An empirical examination. Developmental Psychology 2005, 41:451-463.
17. Diesendruck G., Markson L. Children's avoidance of lexical overlap: A pragmatic account. Developmental Psychology 2001, 37:630-641.
18. Fuson K.C. Children's counting and concepts of number 1988, Springer-Verlag, New York.
19. Gathercole V. Contrast: A semantic constraint?. Journal of Child Language 1989, 16:685-702.
20. Gathercole S.E., Baddeley A.D. Phonological memory deficits in language disordered children: Is there a causal connection?. Journal of Memory and Language 1990, 29(3):336-360.
21. Goro T., Minai U., Crain S.B. Two disjunctions for the price of only one. Proceedings of the 29th Boston University conference on language development 2005, 228-239. Cascadilla Press, Somerville, MA. A. Brugos, M.R. Clark-Cotton, S. Ha (Eds.).
22. Goro T., Minai U., Crain S.B. Bringing out the logic in child language. Proceedings of the 35th annual meeting of the north east linguistic society 2006, 245-256. GLSA Publications, Amherst, MA. L. Bateman, C. Ussery (Eds.).
23. Grice, H. P. (1978). Further notes on logic and conversation. In P. Cole (Ed.), Syntax and semantics: Pragmatics (Vol. 9, pp. 113-128). New York: Academic Press.
24. Grice P. Studies in the way of words 1989, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
25. Gualmini, A., Crain, S., Meroni, L., Chierchia, G., & Guasti, M. T. (2001). At the semantics/pragmatics interface in child language. In Proceedings of semantics and linguistic theory XI. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications, Department of Linguistics, Cornell University.
26. Guasti, M., Chierchia, G., Crain, S., Foppolo, F., Gualmini, A., Meroni, L. (2007). Why children and adults sometimes (but not always) compute implicatures. Language and Cognitive Processes 20, 667-696.
27. Hirschberg, J. (1985). A theory of scalar implicature. Doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
28. Horn, L. (1972). On the semantic properties of the logical operators in English. Doctoral dissertation, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA.
29. Horn L. A natural history of negation 1989, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
30. Huang, Y., Snedeker, J. & Spelke, E. (submitted for publication). What exactly do numbers mean?.
31. Huang Y., Snedeker J. Online interpretation of scalar quantifiers: Insight into the semantics-pragmatics interface. Cognitive Psychology 2009, 58(3):376-415.
32. Huang Y., Snedeker J. Semantic meaning and pragmatic interpretation in five-year olds: Evidence from real time spoken language comprehension. Developmental Psychology 2009, 45(6):1723-1739.
33. Hurewitz F., Papafragou A., Gleitman L., Gelman R. Asymmetries in the acquisition of numbers and quantifiers. Language Learning and Development 2006, 2:77-96.
34. Katzir R. Structurally-defined alternatives. Linguistics and Philosophy 2007, 30:669-690.
35. Markman E.M. Categorization and naming in children 1989, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
36. Musolino J. The semantics and acquisition of number words: Integrating linguistic and developmental perspectives. Cognition 2004, 93(1):1-41.
37. Musolino J. On the semantics of the subset principle. Language Learning and Development 2006, 2(3):195-218.
38. Musolino J., Lidz J. Why Children aren't universally successful with quantification. Linguistics 2006, 44(4):817-852.
39. Noveck I.A. When children are more logical than adults: Experimental investigation of scalar implicatures. Cognition 2001, 78:165-188.
40. Noveck I.A., Posada A. Characterizing the time course of an implicature: An evoked potentials study. Brain and Language 2003, 85:203-210.
41. Papafragou A. From scalar semantics to implicature: Children's interpretation of aspectuals. Journal of Child Language 2006, 33:721-757.
42. Papafragou A., Musolino J. Scalar implicatures: Experiments at the semantics-pragmatics interface. Cognition 2003, 86:253-282.
43. Papafragou A., Tantalou N. Children's computation of implicatures. Language Acquisition 2004, 12:71-82.
44. Pouscoulous N., Noveck I.A., Politzer G., Bastide A. A developmental investigation of processing costs in implicature production. Language Acquisition 2007, 14:347-375.
45. Rapacholi B.M., Gopnik A. Early reasoning about desires: Evidence from 14- and 18-month-olds. Developmental Psychology 1997, 34:1017-1025.
46. Reinhart T. The processing cost of reference-set computation: Acquisition of stress shift and focus. Language Acquisition 2004, 12(2):109-155.
47. Rips L.J. Quantification and semantic memory. Cognitive Psychology 1975, 7:307-340.
48. Smith C.L. Quantifiers and question answering in young children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 1980, 30:191-205.
49. Tomasello M. The social bases of language development. Social Development 1992, 1:67-87.
50. Wynn K. Children's acquisition of number words and the counting system. Cognitive Psychology 1992, 24:220-251.