Temporally stable population-specific differences in run timing of one-sea-winter Atlantic salmon returning to a large river system

Evolutionary Applications

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 39-53

  Vähä, Juha Pekka ^a   Erkinaro, Jaakko ^b   Niemelä, Eero ^b   Primmer, Craig R ^a   Saloniemi, Irma ^a   Johansen, Morten ^c,d   Svenning, Martin ^d   Brørs, Sturla ^e,f  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TURKU   (Finland)

^b FINNISH FOREST RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Finland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TROMSØ   (Norway)

^d NORWEGIAN INSTITUTE FOR NATURE RESEARCH   (Norway)

^e Department of Environmental Affairs   (Norway)

^f Directorate for Nature Management   (Norway)

Author keywords

Behavior; Exploitation; Fisheries management; Genetic stock identification; Life history; Salmo salar; Spawning migration

Indexed keywords

EID: 79952794525     PISSN: 17524563     EISSN: 17524571     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-4571.2010.00131.x     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Anderson, J., and W. N. Beer 2009. Oceanic, riverine, and genetic influences on spring Chinook salmon migration timing. Ecological Applications 19:1989-2003.
2. Anderson, E., R. Waples, and S. Kalinowski 2008. An improved method for predicting the accuracy of genetic stock identification. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 65:1475-1486.
3. Angeloni, L., M. Schlaepfer, J. Lawler, and K. Crooks 2008. A reassessment of the interface between conservation and behavior. Animal Behaviour 75:731-737.
4. Baudouin, L., S. Piry, and J. M. Cornuet 2004. Analytical Bayesian approach for assigning individuals to populations. Journal of Heredity 95:217-224.
5. Beacham, T. D., J. R. Candy, and B. McIntosh 2005. Estimation of stock composition and individual identification of sockeye salmon on a Pacific Rim basis using microsatellite and major histocompatibility complex variation. Transactions of the North American Fisheries Society 134:1124-1146.
6. Begg, G. A., K. D. Friedland, and J. B. Pearce 1999. Stock identification and its role in stock assessment and fisheries management: an overview. Fisheries Research 43:1-8.
7. Caro, T. 2007. Behavior and conservation: a bridge too far? Trends in Ecology and Evolution 22:394-400.
8. Conover, D. O., and S. B. Munch 2002. Sustaining fisheries yields over evolutionary time scales. Science 297:94-96.
9. Cornuet, J. M., S. Piry, G. Luikart, A. Estoup, and M. Solignac 1999. New methods employing multilocus genotypes to select or exclude populations as origins of individuals. Genetics 153:1989-2000.
10. Crozier, W. W., P. Schon, and G. Chaput 2004. Managing Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) in the mixed stock environment: challenges and considerations. ICES Journal of Marine Science 61:1344-1358.
11. Currie, D., D. Thompson, and T. Burke 2000. Patterns of territory settlement and consequences for breeding success in the Northern Wheatear (Oenanthe oenanthe). Ibis 142:389-398.
12. Dingle, H. 1996. Migration: The Biology of Life on the Move. Oxford University Press, New York.
13. Dingle, H., and V. A. Drake 2007. What is migration? BioScience 57:113-121.
14. Dingle, H., S. P. Carroll, J. E. Loye, and J. R. By 1997. Conservation, behavior, and 99% of the world's biodiversity: is our ignorance really bliss? In J. R. Clemmons, and R. Buchholz, eds. Behavioral Approaches to Conservation in the Wild, pp. 72-92. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
15. Dittman, A., and T. Quinn 1996. Homing in Pacific salmon: mechanisms and ecological basis. Journal of Experimental Biology 199:83-91.
16. Elphinstone, M., G. Hinten, M. Anderson, and C. Nock 2003. An inexpensive and high-throughput procedure to extract and purify total genomic DNA for population studies. Molecular Ecology Notes 3:317-320.
17. Englund, V., E. Niemela, M. Lansman, and M. Heino 1999. Variations in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) smolt age in tributaries of the River Teno, Finland. Fisheries Management and Ecology 6:83-86.
18. Erkinaro, J., F. Økland, K. Moen, and E. Niemelä 1999. Return migration of Atlantic salmon in the River Tana - distribution and exploitation of radio-tagged multi-sea-winter salmon. Boreal Environment Research 4:115-124.
19. Ernande, B., U. Dieckmann, and M. Heino 2004. Adaptive changes in harvested populations: plasticity and evolution of age and size at maturation. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 271:415-423.
20. Falush, D., M. Stephens, and J. K. Pritchard 2003. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data: linked loci and correlated allele frequencies. Genetics 164:1567-1587.
21. Fiske, P., R. A. Lund, and L. P. Hansen 2005. Identifying fish farm escapees. In S. X. Cadrin, K. D. Friedland, and J. R. Waldman, eds. Stock Identification Methods; Applications in Fishery Science, pp. 659-680. Elsevier Academic Press, Amsterdam.
22. Fleming, I. A. 1996. Reproductive strategies of Atlantic salmon: ecology and evolution. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 6:379-416.
23. Garcia de Leaniz, C., I. A. Fleming, S. Einum, E. Verspoor, W. C. Jordan, S. Consuegra, N. Aubin-Horth et al. 2007. A critical review of adaptive genetic variation in Atlantic salmon: implications for conservation. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 82:173-211.
24. Gill, J. A., K. Norris, P. M. Potts, T. G. Gunnarsson, P. W. Atkinson, and W. J. Sutherland 2001. The buffer effect and large-scale population regulation in migratory birds. Nature 412:436-438.
25. Goudet, J. 2001. FSTAT, a program to estimate and test gene diversities and fixation indices (version 2.9.3). Updated from Goudet (1995). (accessed April 2010).
26. Grimholt, U., F. Drabløs, S. M. Jørgensen, B. Høyheim, and R. J. M. Stet 2002. The major histocompatibility class I locus in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.): polymorphism, linkage analysis and protein modelling. Immunogenetics 54:570-581.
27. Hansen, L. P., and Jonsson, B. 1991. Evidence of a genetic component in the seasonal return pattern of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.). Journal of Fish Biology 38:251-258.
28. Hard, J. J., M. R. Gross, and M. Heino 2008. Evolutionary consequences of fishing and their implications for salmon. Evolutionary Applications 1:388-408.
29. Hauser, L., T. R. Seamons, M. Dauer, K. A. Naish, and T. P. Quinn 2006. An empirical verification of population assignment methods by marking and parentage data: hatchery and wild steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss) in Forks Creek, Washington, USA. Molecular Ecology 15:3157-3173.
30. Hindar, K., O. Diserud, P. Fiske, T. Forseth, A. J. Jensen, O. Ugedal, N. Jonsson et al. 2007. Gytebestandsmål for laksebestander i Norge (In Norwegian with an English abstract). NINA Rapport 226, 78 pp.
31. Hutchings, J. A., and D. J. Fraser 2008. The nature of fisheries- and farming induced evolution. Molecular Ecology 17:294-313.
32. ICES. 2002. Report of the Working Group on North Atlantic Salmon. ICES CM 2002/ACFM: 14. .
33. Jonsson, N., B. Jonsson, and L. P. Hansen 1990. Partial segregation in the timing of migration of Atlantic salmon of different ages. Animal Behavior 40:313-321.
34. Jutila, E., E. Jokikokko, I. Kallio-Nyberg, I. Saloniemi, and P. Pasanen 2003. Differences in sea migration between wild and reared Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) in the Baltic Sea. Fisheries Research 60:333-343.
35. Karppinen, P., J. Erkinaro, K. Moen, E. Niemelä, and F. Økland 2004. Return migration of Atlantic salmon in the River Tana: distribution, exploitation and migration pattern of radio-tagged 1SW salmon. Journal of Fish Biology 64:1179-1192.
36. Keefer, M. L., C. A. Peery, M. A. Jepson, K. Tolotti, and T. C. Bjornn 2004. Stock-specific migration timing of adult spring-summer chinook salmon in the Columbia River basin. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 24:1145-1162.
37. Kieffer, J. D. 2000. Limits to exhaustive exercise in fish. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A, Molecular and Integrative Physiology 126:161-179.
38. Kokko, H., T. G. Gunnarsson, L. J. Morrell, and J. A. Gill 2006. Why do female migratory birds arrive later than males? Journal of Animal Ecology 75:1293-1303.
39. Koljonen, M., J. Pella, and M. Masuda 2005. Classical individual assignments versus mixture modeling to estimate stock proportions in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) catches from DNA microsatellite data. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 62:2143-2158.
40. Länsman, M., and E. Niemelä 2010. Lohenkalastus Tenojoen sivuvesissä (In Finnish with an English abstract). Finnish Game and Fisheries Research Institute Report 2, 26 pp. .
41. Manel, S., P. Berthier, and G. Luikart 2002. Detecting wildlife poaching: identifying the origin of individuals with Bayesian assignment tests and multilocus genotypes. Conservation Biology 16:650-659.
42. McCullagh, P., and J. A. Nelder 1989. Generalized Linear Models. Chapman & Hall, London.
43. Neaves, P. I., C. G. Wallace, J. R. Candy, and T. D. Beacham 2005. CBayes: computer program for mixed stock analysis of allelic data, version 3.0. (accessed April 2010).
44. Niemelä, E. 2004. Variation in the yearly and seasonal abundance of juvenile Atlantic salmon in a long-term monitoring programme: methodology, status of stocks and reference points. PhD thesis, Acta Universitatis Ouluensis A415.
45. Niemelä, E., P. Orell, and J. Erkinaro 2006. Previously spawned Atlantic salmon ascend a large subarctic river earlier than their maiden counterparts. Journal of Fish Biology 69:1151-1163.
46. Nordqvist, O. 1924. Times of entering of the Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) in the rivers. Rapports et Proces-Verbaux. Conseil Permanent International pour L'Exploration de la Mer 33:5-58.
47. Northcote, T. G. 1978. Migratory strategies and production in freshwater fishes. In S. D. Gerking, ed. Ecology of Freshwater Fish Production, pp. 326-359. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.
48. Økland, F., J. Erkinaro, K. Moen, E. Niemelä, P. Fiske, R. McKinley, and E. Thostad 2001. Return migration of Atlantic salmon in the River Tana: phases of migratory behaviour. Journal of Fish Biology 59:862-874.
49. Orell, P., and J. Erkinaro 2007. Snorkeling as a method for assessing spawning stock of Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar. Fisheries Management and Ecology 14:199-208.
50. Pella, J., and M. Masuda 2001. Bayesian methods for analysis of stock mixtures from genetic characters. Fishery Bulletin 99:151-167.
51. Pimm, S., H. Jones, and J. Diamond 1998. On the risk of extinction. American Naturalist 132:757-785.
52. Pritchard, J. K., M. Stephens, and P. Donnelly 2000. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155:945-959.
53. Quinn, T. P., S. Hodgson, L. Flynn, R. Hilborn, and D. E. Rogers 2007. Directional selection by fisheries and the timing of sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) migrations. Ecological Applications 17:731-739.
54. Rannala, B., and J. L. Mountain 1997. Detecting immigration by using multilocus genotypes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 94:9197-9201.
55. Reddin, D. G. 1986. Effects of different mesh sizes on gill-net catches of Atlantic salmon in Newfoundland. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 6:209-215.
56. Shearer, W. M. 1990. The Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) of the North Esk with particular reference to the relationship between river and sea age and time of return to home waters. Fisheries Research 10:93-123.
57. Shearer, W. M. 1992. The Atlantic Salmon: Natural History, Exploitation and Future Management. Halsted Press, New York.
58. Shumway, C. A. 1999. A neglected science: applying behavior to aquatic conservation. Environmental Biology of Fishes 55:183-201.
59. Siira, A., J. Erkinaro, P. Suuronen, and P. Jounela 2009. Run timing and migration routes of returning Atlantic salmon in the Northern Baltic Sea; implications for fisheries management. Fisheries Management and Ecology 16:177-190.
60. Stet, R. J. M., B. De Vries, K. Mudde, T. Hermsen, J. Van Heerwaarden, B. P. Shum, and U. Grimholt 2002. Unique haplotypes of co-segregating major histocompatibility class II A and class II B alleles in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) give rise to diverse class II genotypes. Immunogenetics 54:320-331.
61. Stewart, D. C., G. W. Smith, and A. F. Youngson 2002. Tributary-specific variation in timing of return of adult Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) to fresh water has a genetic component. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 59:276-281.
62. Swain, D. P., A. F. Sinclair, and J. Mark Hanson 2007. Evolutionary response to size-selective mortality in an exploited fish population. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 274:1015-1022.
63. Taylor, E. B. 1991. A review of local adaptation in salmonidae, with particular reference to Pacific and Atlantic salmon. Aquaculture 98:185-207.
64. Thorley, J. L., A. F. Youngson, and R. Laughton 2007. Seasonal variation in rod recapture rates indicates differential exploitation of Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar, stock components. Fisheries Management and Ecology 14:191-198.
65. Tufto, J., and K. Hindar 2003. Effective size in management and conservation of subdivided populations. Journal of Theoretical Biology 222:273-281.
66. Vähä, J. P., J. Erkinaro, E. Niemela, and C. R. Primmer 2007. Life-history and habitat features influence the within-river genetic structure of Atlantic salmon. Molecular Ecology 16:2638-2654.
67. Vähä, J. P., J. Erkinaro, E. Niemela, and C. R. Primmer 2008. Temporally stable genetic structure and low migration in an Atlantic salmon population complex: implications for conservation and management. Evolutionary Applications 1:137-154.
68. Webster, M. S., P. P. Marra, S. Haig, S. Bensch, and R. T. Holmes 2002. Links between worlds: unraveling migratory connectivity. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 17:76-83.