Modelling Body Motion: an Approach to Functions Using Measuring Instruments

New ICMI Study Series

Volumn 10, Issue , 2007, Pages 129-136

  Arzarello, Ferdinando ^a   Pezzi, Giovanni ^b   Robutti, Ornella ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TURIN   (Italy)

^b Liceo Torricelli   (Italy)

Author keywords

Cognitive Activity; Graphic Calculator; Instrumental Approach; Mathematical Object; Research Forum

Indexed keywords

EID: 79952792415     PISSN: 13876872     EISSN: 22151745     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-29822-1_11     Document Type: Chapter

References (19)

1. Artigue, M. (2001). Learning mathematics in a CAS environment: the genesis of a reflection about instrumentation and the dialectics between technical and conceptual work. Paper presented at the 2° CAME Symposium. Utrecht, The Netherlands.
2. Arzarello, F., & Robutti, O. (2003). Approaching Functions through Motion Experiments. In Nemirowsky et al. (Eds.), Perceptuo-Motor Activity and Imagination in Mathematical Learning. Hawai: Research Forum, Proceedings of PME 27.
3. Arzarello, F., & Paola, D. (2003). Mathematical objects and proofs within technological environments: an embodied analysis. WG9, CERME, Bellaria.
4. Arzarello, F., Bartolini Bussi, M.G., & Robutti, O. (2001). Time(s) in Didactics of Mathematics. A Methodological Challenge. To appear in: L. English, M. Bartolini Bussi, G. Jones, R. Lesh, & D. Tirosh (Eds.), Handbook of International Research in Mathematics Education. USA: LEA.
5. Arzarello, F. (2000a). Inside And Outside: Spaces, Times And Language in Proof Production. Proc.ofPME 24,1,23-38.
6. Bartolini Bussi M.G., Boni M., Ferri F., & Garuti R. (1999). Early Approach to Theoretical Thinking: Gears in Primary School. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 39,61-%1.
7. Bartolini Bussi, M. (1996). Mathematical discussion and perspective drawing in primary school. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 31,11-41.
8. Boero, P., Garuti, R., Lemut, E., Gazzolo, T., & Lladd, C. (1995b). Some Aspects of the Construction of the Geometrical Conception of the Phenomenon of the Sun's Shadow. Proc. PME 19, 3,3-10.
9. Boero, P., Dapueto, C, Ferrari, P., Ferrero, E., Garuti, R., Lemut, E., Parenti, L., & Scali, E. (1995a). Aspects of the Mathematics-Culture Relationship in Mathematics Teaching-Learning in Compulsory School. Proc. PME 19,1,151-166.
10. Clement, J. (1989). The concept of variation and misconceptions in Cartesian graphing. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 11(1-2), 77-87.
11. Kieran, C. (1994). A Junctional approach to the introduction of algebra: some Pros and Cons. Proc.ofPMElS, 1,157-175.
12. Lakoff, G., & Nunez, R. (2000). Where Mathematics comes from. New York: Basic Books.
13. Nemirowsky, R. (2003). Three Conjectures concerning the Relationship between Body Activity and Understanding Mathematics. In Nemirowsky et al. (Eds.), Perceptuo-Motor Activity and Imagination in Mathematical Learning. Hawai: Research Forum, Proceedings of PME 27.
14. Nunez, R. (2000). Mathematical idea analysis: What embodied cognitive science can say about the human nature of mathematics. Proc. of PME 24, 1, 3-22.
15. Rabardel, P. (1995). Les hommes et les technologies. Paris: Colin.
16. Talmy, L. (1996). Fictive motion in language and perception. In P. Bloom, M. Peterson, L. Nadel, & M. Garrett (Eds.), Language and Space. Cambridge: MIT Press.
17. Varela, F.J. (1999). A Dimly Perceived Horizon: The Complex Meeting Ground between Physical and Inner Time. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 879,143-153.
18. Vergnaud, G. (1990). La th^orie des champs conceptuels. Recherches en Didactique des Mathematiques, 10, 133-170.
19. VMUon, P., Rabardel, P. (1995). Artefact and cognition: a contribution to the study of thought in relation to instrumented activity. European Journal of Psychology in Education, vol. DC, n°3.