Past, present, and future regulatory aspects of ventricular assist devices

Journal of Cardiovascular Translational Research

Volumn 3, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 600-603

  Patel Raman, Sonna M ^a   Chen, Eric A ^a  

^a CENTER FOR DEVICES AND RADIOLOGICAL HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

FDA; Mechanical circulatory support; Regulatory; Ventricular assist devices

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL TRIAL (TOPIC); DEVICE APPROVAL; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION; GOVERNMENT REGULATION; HEART ASSIST DEVICE; HEART FAILURE; HUMAN; LEGAL ASPECT; PATIENT SELECTION; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PROSTHESIS; REVIEW; RISK ASSESSMENT; STANDARD; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES;

CLINICAL TRIALS AS TOPIC; DEVICE APPROVAL; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; GOVERNMENT REGULATION; HEART FAILURE; HEART-ASSIST DEVICES; HUMANS; PATIENT SELECTION; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; RISK ASSESSMENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES; UNITED STATES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION;

EID: 79952787684     PISSN: 19375387     EISSN: 19375395     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12265-010-9225-3     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Goldstein, D. J., & Oz, M. C. (2000). Cardiac assist devices. Armonk, NY: Futura.
2. Frazier, O. H., Rose, E. A., Oz, M. C., Dembitsky, W., McCarthy, P., Radovancevic, B., et al. (2001). Multicenter clinical evaluation of the HeartMate vented electric left ventricular assist system in patients awaiting heart transplantation. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 122(6), 1186-1195.
3. El-Banayosy, A., Korfer, R., Arusoglu, L., Kizner, L.,Morshuis, M., Milting,H., et al. (2001).Device and patientmanagement in a bridge-to- transplant setting. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 71(3 Suppl), S98-S102. (Pubitemid 32216196)
4. El-Banayosy, A., Arusoglu, L., Kizner, L., Tenderich, G., Minami, K., Inoue, K., et al. (2000). Novacor left ventricular assist system versus Heartmate vented electric left ventricular assist system as a long-term mechanical circulatory support device in bridging patients: a prospective study. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 119(3), 581-587. (Pubitemid 30146539)
5. Di Bella, I., Pagani, F., Banfi, C., Ardemagni, E., Capo, A., Klersy, C., et al. (2000). Results with the Novacor assist system and evaluation of long-term assistance. European Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, 18(1), 112-116. (Pubitemid 30408636)
6. Minami, K., El-Banayosy, A., Sezai, A., Arusoglu, L., Sarnowsky, P., Fey, O., et al. (2000). Morbidity and outcome after mechanical ventricular support using Thoratec, Novacor, and HeartMate for bridging to heart transplantation. Artificial Organs, 24(6), 421-426. (Pubitemid 30430500)
7. Farrar, D. J., Hill, J. D., Pennington, D. G., McBride, L. R., Holman, W. L., Kormos, R. L., et al. (1997). Preoperative and postoperative comparison of patients with univentricular and biventricular support with the Thoratec ventricular assist device as a bridge to cardiac transplantation. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 113(1), 202-209. (Pubitemid 27034359)
8. http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh-docs/pdf6/P060040b.pdf. Accessed February 8, 2010.
9. Rose, E. A., Gelijns, A. C., Moskowitz, A. J., et al. (2001). Longterm mechanical left ventricular assistance for end-stage heart failure. The New England Journal of Medicine, 345, 1435-1443.
10. http://www.intermacs.org/ accessed on February 8, 2010.
11. http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh-docs/pdf6/P060040S005b.pdf. Accessed February 8, 2010.
12. http://www.uab.edu/ctsresearch/intermacs/Document%20Library/ printableForms.html. Accessed February 8, 2010.