Perceptual load influences auditory space perception in the ventriloquist aftereffect

Cognition

Volumn 118, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 62-74

  Eramudugolla, Ranmalee ^a   Kamke, Marc R ^a   Soto Faraco, Salvador ^b   Mattingley, Jason B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITAT POMPEU FABRA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Attention; Multisensory integration; Perceptual adaptation; Sound localization; Ventriloquist aftereffect

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; AUDITORY STIMULATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOUND DETECTION; STIMULUS RESPONSE; VENTRILOQUIST AFTEREFFECT; VISUAL STIMULATION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; HEARING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSIOLOGY;

ADULT; ATTENTION; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; SPACE PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79952776638     PISSN: 00100277     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.09.009     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Alais D., Burr D. The Ventriloquist effect results from near-optimal bimodal integration. Current Biology 2004, 14:257-262.
2. Alsius, A., Soto-Faraco, S. (submitted for publication). Searching for audiovisual correspondence in speech.
3. Alsius A., Navarra J., Campbell R., Soto-Faraco S. Audiovisual integration of speech falters under high attention demands. Current Biology 2005, 15(9):839-843.
4. Alsius A., Navarra J., Soto-Faraco S. Attention to touch weakens audiovisual speech integration. Experimental Brain Research 2007, 183(3):399-404.
5. Andersen S.K., Hillyard S.A., Muller M.M. Attention facilitates multiple stimulus features in parallel in human visual cortex. Current Biology 2008, 18:1006-1009.
6. Bertelson P., Frissen I., Vroomen J., de Gelder B. The aftereffects of ventriloquism: Patterns of spatial generalization. Perception and Psychophysics 2006, 68:428-436.
7. Bertelson P., Vroomen J., de Gelder B., Driver J. The ventriloquist effect does not depend on the direction of deliberate visual attention. Perception & Psychophysics 2000, 62:321-332.
8. Canon L.K. Intermodality inconsistency of input and directed attention as determinants of the nature of adaptation. Journal of Eperimental Psychology 1970, 84:141-147.
9. Cosman J.D., Vecera S.P. Perceptual load modulates attentional capture by abrupt onsets. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2009, 16:404-410.
10. Desimone R., Duncan J. Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annual Review of Neuroscience 1995, 18:193-222.
11. Driver J., Mattingley J.B., Rorden C., Davis G. Extinction as a paradigm measure of attentional bias and restricted capacity following brain injury. Parietal lobe contributions to orientation in 3D space 1997, 401-429. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg. P.K. Thier, H.-O. Karnath (Eds.).
12. Fairhall S.L., Macaluso E. Spatial attention can modulate audiovisual integration at multiple cortical and subcortical sites. European Journal of Neuroscience 2009, 29:1247-1257.
13. Frissen I., Vroomen J., de Gelder B., Bertelson P. The aftereffects of ventriloquism: Are they sound-frequency specific?. Acta Psychologica 2003, 113:315-327.
14. Frissen I., Vroomen J., de Gelder B., Bertelson P. The aftereffects of ventriloquism: Generalization across sound-frequencies. Acta Psychologica 2005, 118:93-100.
15. Fujisaki W., Koene A., Arnold D., Johnston A., Nishida S. Visual search for a target changing in synchrony with an auditory signal. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 2006, 273:865-874.
16. Johnson J.A., Zatorre R.J. Attention to simultaneous unrelated auditory and visual events: Behavioural and neural correlates. Cerebral Cortex 2005, 15:1609-1620.
17. King A.J. Multisensory integration: Strategies for synchronization. Current Biology 2005, 15:R339-R341.
18. Kopco N., Lin I.-F., Shinn-Cunningham B.G., Groh J.M. Reference frame of the ventriloquist aftereffect. Journal of Neuroscience 2009, 29(44):13809-13814.
19. LaBerge D., Brown V. Theory of attentional operations in shape identification. Psychological Review 1989, 96:101-124.
20. Lavie N. Distracted and confused? Selective attention under load. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2005, 9:75-82.
21. Lavie N., Cox S. On the efficiency of visual search: Efficient visual search leads to inefficient distractor rejection. Psychological Science 1997, 8:395-398.
22. Lewald J. Eye-position effects in directional hearing. Behavioural Brain Research 1997, 87:35-48.
23. Lewald J. Rapid adaptation to auditory-visual spatial disparity. Learning & Memory 2002, 9:268-278.
24. Macaluso E., Driver J. Mutlisensory spatial interactions: A window onto functional integration in the human brain. Trends in Neurosciences 2005, 28:264-271.
25. Manly T., Dobler V.B., Dodds C.M., George M.A. Rightward shift in spatial awareness with declining alertness. Neuropsychologia 2005, 43:1721-1728.
26. Mattingley, J. B., Berberovic, N., Rorden, C., & Driver, J. (2003). Attentional load at fixation modulates the spatial gradient for detection of visual stimuli in extinction. Paper presented at the cognitive neuroscience society annual meeting, New York.
27. Mattingley J.B., Pisella L., Rossetti Y., Rode G., Tilikete C., Boisson D., et al. Visual extinction in oculocentric coordinates: A selective bias in dividing attention between hemifields. Neurocase 2000, 6:465-475.
28. McDonald J.J., Teder-Salejarvi W.A., Ward L.M. Multisensory integration and crossmodal attention effects in the human brain. Science 2001, 292(5523):1791.
29. McGurk H., MacDonald J.W. Hearing lips and seeing voices. Nature 1976, 264:746-748.
30. Montaser-Kouhsari L., Rajimehr R. Attentional modulation of adaptation to illusory lines. Journal of Vision 2004, 4:434-444.
31. Oldfield S.R., Parker P.A. Acuity of sound localisation: A topography of auditory space. Perception 1984, 581:600.
32. Oruç I., Sinnett S., Bischof W.F., Soto-Faraco S., Lock K., Kingstone A. The effect of attention on the illusory capture of motion in bimodal stimuli. Brain Research 2008, 1242:200-208.
33. Passamonti C., Frissen I., Ladavas E. Visual recalibration of auditory spatial perception: Two separate neural circuits for perceptual learning. European Journal of Neuroscience 2009, 30:1141-1150.
34. Peers P., Cusack R., Duncan J. Modulation of spatial bias in the dual task paradigm: Evidence from patients with unilateral parietal lesions and controls. Neuropsychologia 2006, 44:1325-1335.
35. Perez A., Peers P.V., Valdes-Sosa M., Galan L. Hemispheric modulations of alpha-band power reflect the rightward shift in attention induced by enhanced attentional load. Neuropsychologia 2009, 47:41-49.
36. Pinsk M.A., Doniger G.M., Kastner S. Push-Pull mechanism of selective attention in human extrastriate cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology 2004, 92:622-629.
37. Radeau M., Bertelson P. The after-effects of ventriloquism. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1974, 26:63-71.
38. Razavi B., O'Neill W.E., Paige G.D. Auditory spatial perception dynamically realignes with changing eye position. The Journal of Neuroscience 2007, 27:10249-10258.
39. Recanzone G.H. Rapidly induced auditory plasticity: The ventriloquism aftereffect. Proclamations of the National Academy of Sciences USA 1998, 95:869-875.
40. Recanzone G.H., Sutter M.L. The biological basis of audition. Annual Review of Psychology 2008, 59:119-142.
41. Rees G., Frith C.D., Lavie N. Modulating irrelevant motion perception by varying attentional load in an unrelated task. Science 1997, 278:1616-1619.
42. Robertson I.H., Manly T., Beschin N., Daini R., Haeske-Dewick H., Homberg V. Auditory sustained attention is a marker of unilateral spatial neglect. Neuropsychologia 1997, 35:1527-1532.
43. Santangelo V., Finoia P., Raffone A., Olivetti Belardinelli M., Spence C. Perceptual load affects exogenous spatial orienting while working memory load does not. Experimental Brain Research 2008, 184:371-382.
44. Sarlat L., Warusfel O., Viaud-Delmon I. Ventriloquism aftereffects occur in the rear hemisphere. Neuroscience Letters 2006, 404:324-329.
45. Schwartz S., Vuilleumier P., Hutton C., Maravita A., Dolan R.J., Driver J. Attentional Load and sensory competition in human vision: Modulation of fMRI responses by load at fixation during task-irrelevant stimulation in the peripheral visual field. Cerebral Cortex 2005, 15:770-786.
46. Senkowski D., Saint-Amour D., Gruber T., Foxe J.J. Look who's talking: The deployment of visuo-spatial attention during multisensory speech processing under noisy environmental conditions. NeuroImage 2008, 43:379-387.
47. Senkowski D., Talsma D., Herrmann C.S., Woldorff M.G. Multisensory processing and oscillatory gamma responses: Effects of spatial selective attention. Experimental Brain Research 2005, 166(3-4):411-426.
48. Spence C., Squire S. Multisensory integration: Maintaining the perception of synchrony. Current Biology 2003, 13:R519-R521.
49. Talsma D., Senkowski D., Soto-Faraco S., Woldorff M.G. The multifaceted interplay between attention and multisensory integration. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2010, 14:400-410.
50. Talsma D., Woldorff M. Selective attention and multiple phases of effects on the evoked brain activity. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2005, 17:1098-1114.
51. van de Burg E., Olivers C.N.L., Bronkhorst A.W., Theeuwes J. Pip and pop: Nonspatial auditory signals improve spatial visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2008, 34:1053-1065.
52. Vroomen J., Bertelson P., de Gelder B. The ventriloquist effect does not depend on the direction of automatic visual attention. Perception & Psychophysics 2001, 63:651-659.
53. Yucel G., Petty C., McCarthy G., Belger A. Graded visual attention modulates brain responses evoked by task-irrelevant auditory pitch changes. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2005, 17:1819-1828.