The current status of off-pump coronary bypass surgery

Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 64-69

  Huffmyer, Julie ^a   Raphael, Jacob ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA HEALTH SYSTEM   (United States)

Author keywords

Cardiopulmonary bypass; Coronary artery disease; Inflammation; Morbidity; Mortality

Indexed keywords

INTERLEUKIN 10; INTERLEUKIN 6; INTERLEUKIN 8; TUMOR NECROSIS FACTOR;

ANALGESIA; ANESTHESIA LEVEL; AORTA ATHEROSCLEROSIS; BLEEDING; BLOOD CLOTTING DISORDER; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; BRAIN INJURY; CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; GRAFT PATENCY; HEART ATRIUM FIBRILLATION; HEART MUSCLE REVASCULARIZATION; HEART OUTPUT; HEMODILUTION; HIGH RISK PATIENT; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; INFLAMMATION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KIDNEY DYSFUNCTION; KIDNEY PERFUSION; LENGTH OF STAY; LONG TERM CARE; LUNG DISEASE; MORBIDITY; OFF PUMP CORONARY SURGERY; PATIENT SELECTION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REGIONAL ANESTHESIA; REVIEW; STROKE; SURGICAL INFECTION; SURGICAL MORTALITY; SURGICAL RISK; THORAX EPIDURAL ANESTHESIA; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ANESTHESIA; ATRIAL FIBRILLATION; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS, OFF-PUMP; HUMANS; PATIENT SELECTION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; RENAL INSUFFICIENCY; STROKE; VASCULAR PATENCY;

EID: 79952770889     PISSN: 09527907     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/ACO.0b013e328341ccf5     Document Type: Review

References (48)

1. Kolessov VI. Mammary artery-coronary artery anastomosis as method of treatment for angina pectoris. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1967; 54:535-544.
2. Edmunds LH Jr. Inflammatory response to cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg 1998; 66:S12-S16; discussion S25-S28.
3. Hu S, Zheng Z, Yuan X, et al. Increasing long-term major vascular events and resource consumption in patients receiving off-pump coronary artery bypass: a single-center prospective observational study. Circulation 2010; 121:1800-1808. A prospective, observational study that reported no difference in all-cause mortality between OPCAB and on-pump patients, however, a higher rate of major vascular events was reported in the OPCAB group.
4. Roach GW, Kanchuger M, Mangano CM, et al. Adverse cerebral outcomes after coronary bypass surgery. Multicenter Study of Perioperative Ischemia Research Group and the Ischemia Research and Education Foundation Investigators. N Engl J Med 1996; 335:1857-1863.
5. Taylor KM. Central nervous system effects of cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg 1998; 66:S20-S24; discussion S25-S28.
6. Taylor KM. Brain damage during cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg 1998; 65:S20-S26; discussion S27-S28.
7. Khan NE, De Souza A, Mister R, et al. A randomized comparison of off-pump and on-pump multivessel coronary-artery bypass surgery. N Engl J Med 2004; 350:21-28. (Pubitemid 38032180)
8. Selvanayagam JB, Petersen SE, Francis JM, et al. Effects of off-pump versus on-pump coronary surgery on reversible and irreversible myocardial injury: a randomized trial using cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging and biochemical markers. Circulation 2004; 109:345-350. (Pubitemid 38133902)
9. Mangano CM, Diamondstone LS, Ramsay JG, et al. Renal dysfunction after myocardial revascularization: risk factors, adverse outcomes, and hospital resource utilization. The Multicenter Study of Perioperative Ischemia Research Group. Ann Intern Med 1998; 128:194-203. (Pubitemid 28078200)
10. Lassnigg A, Schmid ER, Hiesmayr M, et al. Impact of minimal increases in serum creatinine on outcome in patients after cardiothoracic surgery: do we have to revise current definitions of acute renal failure? Crit Care Med 2008; 36:1129-1137.
11. Lytle BW, Sabik JF. On-pump and off-pump bypass surgery: tools for revascularization. Circulation 2004; 109:810-812. (Pubitemid 38252727)
12. Guru V, Glasgow KW, Fremes SE, et al. The real-world outcomes of off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery in a public healthcare system. Can J Cardiol 2007; 23:281-286. (Pubitemid 46779364)
13. Williams ML, Muhlbaier LH, Schroder JN, et al. Risk-adjusted short- and long-term outcomes for on-pump versus off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery. Circulation 2005; 112:I366-I370. (Pubitemid 41266700)
14. Sezai Y, Orime Y, Tsukamoto S. Coronary artery surgery results 2005 in Japan. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2007; 13:220-223.
15. Abu-Omar Y, Taggart DP. The present status of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2009; 36:312-321. A thorough literature review about the current status of OPCAB surgery.
16. Cartier R. Off-pump coronary artery revascularization in octogenarians: is it better? Curr Opin Cardiol 2009; 24:544-552.
17. Emmert MY, Salzberg SP, Seifert B, et al. Routine off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting is safe and feasible in high-risk patients with left main disease. Ann Thorac Surg 2010; 89:1125-1130. OPCAB is safe in patients with left main coronary artery stenosis. Complete revascularization was achieved as planned.
18. Bainbridge D, Cheng DC. Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass and off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: anesthetic considerations. Anesthesiol Clin 2008; 26:437-452.
19. Sellke FW, Chu LM, Cohn WE. Current state of surgical myocardial revascularization. Circ J 2010; 74:1031-1037. A thorough and comprehensive review about OPCAB and other surgical coronary revascularization procedures.
20. Jin R, Hiratzka LF, Grunkemeier GL, et al. Aborted off-pump coronary artery bypass patients have much worse outcomes than on-pump or successful off-pump patients. Circulation 2005; 112:I332-I337. (Pubitemid 41266695)
21. Sellke FW, DiMaio JM, Caplan LR, et al. Comparing on-pump and off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: numerous studies but few conclusions: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association council on cardiovascular surgery and anesthesia in collaboration with the interdisciplinary working group on quality of care and outcomes research. Circulation 2005; 111:2858-2864. (Pubitemid 40791559)
22. 2 for off pump coronary artery bypass surgery. Ann Card Anaesth 2010; 13:28-33.
23. Arom KV, Flavin TF, Emery RW, et al. Safety and efficacy of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 2000; 69:704-710. (Pubitemid 30184680)
24. Cleveland JC Jr, Shroyer AL, Chen AY, et al. Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting decreases risk-adjusted mortality and morbidity. Ann Thorac Surg 2001; 72:1282-1288; discussion 1288-1289.
25. Shroyer AL, Grover FL, Hattler B, et al. On-pump versus off-pump coronary-artery bypass surgery. N Engl J Med 2009; 361:1827-1837. In a large prospective multicenter randomized trial OPCAB was associated with higher 1-year mortality and lower graft patency.
26. Caputo M, Yeatman M, Narayan P, et al. Effect of off-pumpcoronary surgery with right ventricular assist device on organ function and inflammatory response: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Thorac Surg 2002; 74:2088-2095; discussion 2095-2096.
27. Hannan EL, Wu C, Smith CR, et al. Off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery: differences in short-term outcomes and in long-term mortality and need for subsequent revascularization. Circulation 2007; 116:1145-1152. (Pubitemid 47364672)
28. Nesher N, Frolkis I, Vardi M, et al. Higher levels of serum cytokines and myocardial tissue markers during on-pump versus off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery. J Card Surg 2006; 21:395-402. (Pubitemid 43989938)
29. Serrano CV Jr, Souza JA, Lopes NH, et al. Reduced expression of systemic proinflammatory and myocardial biomarkers after off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: a prospective randomized study. J Crit Care 2010; 25:305-312. Patients after on-pump CABG have higher markers of inflammation compared to patients after OPCAB
30. Song SW, Yi G, Lee S, et al. Perioperative indicators of stress response and postoperative inflammatory complications in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: a prospective observational study. Circ J 2008; 72:1966-1974.
31. Moller CH, Penninga L, Wetterslev J, et al. Clinical outcomes in randomized trials of off- vs. on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: systematic review with meta-analyses and trial sequential analyses. Eur Heart J 2008; 29:2601-2616.
32. Bakhtiary F, Therapidis P, Dzemali O, et al. Impact of high thoracic epidural anesthesia on incidence of perioperative atrial fibrillation in off-pump coronary bypass grafting: a prospective randomized study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2007; 134:460-464. (Pubitemid 47088608)
33. Kuss O, von Salviati B, Borgermann J. Off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: a systematic review and meta-analysis of propensity score analyses. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010; 140:829-835. A large meta-analysis comparing outcomes of OPCAB vs. on-pump CABG in more than 123 000 patients.
34. Newman MF, Mathew JP, Grocott HP, et al. Central nervous system injury associated with cardiac surgery. Lancet 2006; 368:694-703. (Pubitemid 44223696)
35. Racz MJ, Hannan EL, Isom OW, et al. A comparison of short- and long-term outcomes after off-pump and on-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery with sternotomy. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 43:557-564. (Pubitemid 38229525)
36. Mack MJ, Pfister A, Bachand D, et al. Comparison of coronary bypass surgery with and without cardiopulmonary bypass in patients with multivessel disease. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004; 127:167-173. (Pubitemid 38160480)
37. Al-Ruzzeh S, George S, Bustami M, et al. Effect of off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery on clinical, angiographic, neurocognitive, and quality of life outcomes: randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2006; 332:1365-1371.
38. Motallebzadeh R, Bland JM, Markus HS, et al. Neurocognitive function and cerebral emboli: randomized study of on-pump versus off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2007; 83:475-482. (Pubitemid 46135449)
39. Van Dijk D, Spoor M, Hijman R, et al. Cognitive and cardiac outcomes 5 years after off-pump vs on-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery. JAMA 2007; 297:701-708. (Pubitemid 46294559)
40. Stroobant N, van Nooten G, De Bacquer D, et al. Neuropsychological functioning 3-5 years after coronary artery bypass grafting: does the pump make a difference? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2008; 34:396-401.
41. Shroff GR, Li S, Herzog CA. Survival of patients on dialysis having off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery in the United States. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010; 139:1333-1338. Dialysis patients have better short-term outcome after OPCAB than on-pump CABG.
42. Nigwekar SU, Kandula P, Hix JK, Thakar CV. Off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery and acute kidney injury: a meta-analysis of randomized and observational studies. Am J Kidney Dis 2009; 54:413-423. OPCAB is associated with a lower risk of postoperative acute kidney injury.
43. Massoudy P, Wagner S, Thielmann M, et al. Coronary artery bypass surgery and acute kidney injury: impact of the off-pump technique. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2008; 23:2853-2860.
44. Yu HY, Li JY, Sun S, et al. Late dialysis rate for coronary artery bypass grafting patients with moderate-to-severe renal impairment: comparison between off-pump and conventional method. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2008; 33:364-369.
45. Takagi H, Matsui M, Umemoto T. Lower graft patency after off-pump than on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: an updated meta-analysis of randomized trials. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010; 140:e45-e47. A large meta-analysis that reported a lower graft patency with OPCAB compared with on-pump CABG.
46. Guyton RA. Surgery: on-pump or off-pump CABG surgery-under the spotlight. Nat Rev Cardiol 2010; 7:64-65.
47. Chu D, Bakaeen FG, Dao TK, et al. On-pump versus off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in a cohort of 63,000 patients. Ann Thorac Surg 2009; 87:1820-1826; discussion 1826-1827. OPCAB was associated with significantly longer hospitalization and higher in-hospital costs when compared with on-pump CABG in this study.
48. Takagi H, Matsui M, Umemoto T. Off-pump coronary artery bypass may increase late mortality: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. Ann Thorac Surg 2010; 89:1881-1888. A large meta-analysis that demonstrated that long-term (≥1 year) all-cause mortality was significantly higher in the OPCAB patients as compared to the on-pump group.