A practical method for transforming free-text eligibility criteria into computable criteria

Journal of Biomedical Informatics

Volumn 44, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 239-250

  Tu, Samson W ^a   Peleg, Mor ^a,b   Carini, Simona ^c   Bobak, Michael ^c   Ross, Jessica ^d   Rubin, Daniel ^a   Sim, Ida ^c  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HAIFA   (Israel)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Clinical trials; Eligibility criteria; Natural language processing; Ontology; OWL; Relational databases

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL TRIAL; ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA; LANGUAGE PROCESSING; OWL; RELATIONAL DATABASE;

EXPERIMENTS; MEDICAL COMPUTING; SEMANTICS;

ONTOLOGY;

ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; CLINICAL RESEARCH; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DATA BASE; EVALUATION; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; NOMENCLATURE; PATIENT IDENTIFICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEMANTICS; STANDARD; TECHNIQUE;

CLINICAL TRIALS AS TOPIC; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DATABASES, FACTUAL; ELIGIBILITY DETERMINATION; INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL; SEMANTICS; VOCABULARY, CONTROLLED;

EID: 79952761747     PISSN: 15320464     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2010.09.007     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Campbell MK, Snowdon C, Francis D, Elbourne D, McDonald AM, Knight R, et al. Recruitment to randomised trials: strategies for trial enrollment and participation study. The STEPS study. Health Technol Assess 2007;11(48):iii, ix-105.
2. Boissel J.P., Amsallem E., Cucherat M., Nony P., Haugh M.C. Bridging the gap between therapeutic research results and physician prescribing decisions: knowledge transfer, a prerequisite to knowledge translation. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2004, 60(9):609-616.
3. Weng C., Tu S.W., Sim I., Richesson R. Formal representations of eligibility criteria: a literature review. JBI 2010, 43(3):451-467.
4. OWL Working Group. OWL 2 web ontology language: structural specification and functional-style syntax; 2009.
5. Niland J. ASPIRE: agreement on standardized protocol inclusion requirements for eligibility; 2007. Available from: [accessed 20.8.2008]. http://www.hssp-cohort.wikispaces.com/space/showimage/ASPIRE+CDISC+Intrachange+July+10+2007+Final.ppt.
6. Hripcsak G, Clayton PD, Pryor TA, Haug P, Wigertz OB, Van der lei J. The Arden Syntax for medical logic modules. In: Proc Ann Symp Comput Appl Med Care, Washington, DC; 1990. p. 200-4.
7. Sordo M., Boxwala A., Ogunyemi O., Greenes R. Description and status update on GELLO: a proposed standardized object-oriented expression language for clinical decision support. Medinfo 2004, 164-168.
8. Pryor T., Hripcsak G. Sharing MLM's: an experiment between Columbia-Presbyterian and LDS hospital. Proc Ann Symp Comput Appl Med Care 1993, 399-403.
9. Tu SW, Peleg M, Carini S, Rubin D, Sim I. ERGO: a template-based expression language for encoding eligibility criteria; 2008.
10. Tu SW, Musen MA. Modeling data and knowledge in the EON guideline architecture. MedInfo, London, UK; 2001. p. 280-4.
11. Tu S.W., Campbell J.R., Glasgow J., Nyman M.A., McClure R., McClay J., et al. The SAGE guideline model: achievements and overview. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2007, 14(5):589-598.
12. Ross J, Carini S, Tu SW, Sim I. Analysis of eligibility criteria complexity in randomized clinical trials. AMIA CRI Summit, San Franciso, USA; 2010.
13. Friedman C., Shagina L., Lussier Y., Hripcsak G. Automated encoding of clinical documents based on natural language processing. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2004, 11(5):392-402.
14. Huang Y., Lowe H.J., Klein D., Cucina R.J. Improved identification of noun phrases in clinical radiology reports using a high-performance statistical natural language parser augmented with the UMLS specialist lexicon. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2005, 12(3):275-285.
15. Peleg M., Tu S.W., Bury J., Ciccarese P., Fox J., Greenes R.A., et al. Comparing computer-interpretable guideline models: a case-study approach. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2003, 10(1):52-68.
16. Aronson A.R. Effective mapping of biomedical text to the UMLS Metathesaurus: the MetaMap program. Proc AMIA Symp 2001, 17-21.
17. Spackman K. SNOMED RT and SNOMEDCT. Promise of an international clinical terminology. MD Comput 2000, 17(6):29.
18. Peleg M., Keren S., Denekamp Y. Mapping computerized clinical guidelines to electronic medical records: knowledge-data ontological mapper (KDOM). J Biomed Inform 2008, 41(1):180-201.
19. German E., Leibowitz A., Shahar Y. An architecture for linking medical decision-support applications to clinical databases and its evaluation. J Biomed Inform 2009, 42(2):203-218.
20. Johnson PD, Tu SW, Musen MA, Purves I. A virtual medical record for guideline-based decision support. In: Proc AMIA Symp, Washington, DC; 2001. p. 294-8.
21. Borlawsky T, Payne PR. Evaluating an NLP-based approach to modeling computable clinical trial eligibility criteria. AMIA Ann Symp Proc 2007:878.
22. Health Level Seven. HL 7 reference information model; 2009. Available from: [cited 2008]. http://www.hl7.org/library/data-model/RIM/modelpage_mem.htm.
23. Cornet R. Definitions and qualifiers in SNOMED CT. Methods Inf Med 2009, 48(2):178-183.
24. Smith B., Ceusters W., Klagges B., Kohler J., Kumar A., Lomax J., et al. Relations in biomedical ontologies. Genome Biol 2005, 6(5):R46.