Patient barriers to mammography identified during a reminder program

Journal of Women's Health

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 421-428

  Feldstein, Adrianne C ^a,b   Perrin, Nancy ^b   Rosales, A Gabriela ^b   Schneider, Jennifer ^b   Rix, Mary M ^b   Glasgow, Russell E ^c  

^a KAISER PERMANENTE   (United States)

^b CENTER FOR HEALTH RESEARCH   (United States)

^c KAISER PERMANENTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; INFORMATION SERVICE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; OBESITY; PAIN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY;

EID: 79952759782     PISSN: 15409996     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2010.2195     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Berry DA, Cronin KA, Plevritis SK, et al. Effect of screening and adjuvant therapy on mortality from breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2005;353:1784-1792. (Pubitemid 41549890)
2. Overmoyer B. Breast cancer screening. Med Clin North Am 1999;83:1443-1557.
3. National Cancer Institute. Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results. Available at seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/breast.html
4. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for breast cancer, Topic page. AHRQ, 2009. www.uspreventiveservices taskforce.org/uspstf/uspsbrca.htm
5. Valanis BG, Glasgow RE, Mullooly J, et al. Screening HMO women overdue for both mammograms and Pap tests. Prev Med 2002;34:40-50. (Pubitemid 34975760)
6. Breen N, Cronin A, Meissner HI, et al. Reported drop in mammography: Is this cause for concern? Cancer 2007;109: 2405-2409. (Pubitemid 46906458)
7. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for breast cancer. Available at www.ahrq.gov/clinic/uspstf/uspsbrca.htm
8. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG practice bulletin. Clinical management guidelines for obstetrician-gynecologists. Number 42, April 2003. Breast cancer screening. Obstet Gynecol 2003;101:821-831.
9. Baron RC, Rimer BK, Coates RJ, et al. Client-directed inter-ventions to increase community access to breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening: A systematic review. Am J Prev Med 2008;35:S56-S66. (Pubitemid 351787499)
10. Bonfill X, Marzo M, Pladevall M, Marti J, Emparanza JI. Strategies for increasing women participation in community breast cancer screening. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004;3.
11. Feldstein AC, Perrin N, Rosales AG, et al. Effect of a mul-timodal reminder program on repeat mammogram screen-ing. Am J Prev Med 2009;37:94-101.
12. Jean S, Major D, Rochette L, Brisson J. Screening mam-mography participation and invitational strategy: The Que-bec Breast Cancer Screening Program, 1998-2000. Chronic Dis Can 2005;26:52-58. (Pubitemid 41735846)
13. Bailey TM, Delva J, Gretebeck K, Siefert K, Ismail A. A systematic review of mammography educational interven-tions for low-income women. Am J Health Promot 2005;20: 96-107. (Pubitemid 41597355)
14. Rimer BK, Meissner H, Breen N, Legler J, Coyne CA. Social and behavioral interventions to increase breast cancer screening. In: Schneiderman N, Speers M, Silva J, et al, eds. Integrating behavioral and social sciences with public health. Washington, DC American Psychological Associa-tion, 2001:177
15. Vernon SW, Briss PA, Tiro JA, Warnecke RB. Some metho-dologic lessons learned from cancer screening research. Cancer 2004;101:1131-1145. (Pubitemid 39100411)
16. Maruthur NM, Bolen S, Brancati FL, Clark JM. Obesity and mammography: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Gen Intern Med 2009;24:665-677.
17. Screening mammography: A missed clinical opportunity? Results of the NCI Breast Cancer Screening Consortium and National Health Interview Survey Studies. JAMA 1990;264: 54-58.
18. Schueler KM, Chu PW, Smith-Bindman R. Factors associated with mammography utilization: A systematic quantitative review of the literature. J Womens Health 2008;17:1477-1498.
19. George SA. Barriers to breast cancer screening: An integra-tive review. Health Care Women Int 2000;21:53-65.
20. Cronin KA, Miglioretti DL, Krapcho M, et al. Bias associated with self-report of prior screening mammography. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2009;18:1699-1705.
21. Burkhauser RV, Cawley J. Beyond BMI: The value of more accurate measures of fatness and obesity in social science research J Health Econ 2008;27:519-529.
22. Palta M, Prineas RJ, Berman R, Hannan P. Comparison of self-reported and measured height and weight. Am J Epi-demiol1982;115:223-230. (Pubitemid 12182301)
23. Freeborn DK, Pope C Promise and performance in managed care: The prepaid group practice model. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1994.
24. Valanis B, Whitlock EE, Mullooly J, et al. Screening rarely screened women: Time-to-service and 24-month outcomes of tailored interventions. Prev Med 2003;37:442-450. (Pubitemid 37315555)
25. Schneeweiss S, Wang PS, Avorn J, Maclure M, Levin R, Glynn RJ. Consistency of performance ranking of co-morbidity adjustment scores in Canadian and U.S. utiliza-tion data. J Gen Intern Med 2004;19:444-450. (Pubitemid 38638905)
26. Schneeweiss S, Walker AM, Glynn RJ, Maclure M, Dormuth C, Soumerai SB. Outcomes of reference pricing for angio-tensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors. N EnglJ Med 2002;346: 822-829. (Pubitemid 34984656)
27. Glasgow RE, Whitlock EP, Valanis BG, Vogt TM. Barriers to mammography and Pap smear screening among women who recently had neither, one or both types of screening. Ann Behav Med 2000;22:223-228. (Pubitemid 32429388)
28. McCaul KD, Goetz PW. Worry\The Penn State Worry Questionnaire (PSWQ). Health behavior constructs: Theory, measurement and research Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute, 2009.
29. Champion V. Perceived benefits. Health behavior constructs: Theory, measurement and research. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute, 2009.
30. Breast cancer. HINTS Health Information National Trends Survey. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute, 2009.
31. Baron RM, Kenny DA. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psycho 1986;51:1173-1182.
32. Preacher KJ, Hayes AF. SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Be-hav Res Methods Instruments Comput 2004;36:717-731. (Pubitemid 40251423)
33. Feldstein AC, Vogt TM, Aickin M, Hu WR Mammography screening rates decline: A person-time approach to evalua-tion. Prev Med. 2006;43:178-182. (Pubitemid 44348822)
34. Ferrante JM, Chen PH, Crabtree BF, Wartenberg D. Cancer screening in women: Body mass index and adherence to physician recommendations. Am J Prev Med 2007;32:525-531. (Pubitemid 46805196)
35. Ogden CL, Carroll MD, McDowell MA, Flegal KM. Obe-sity among adults in the United States\No statistically significant chance since 2003-2004. NCHS Data Brief 2007;1-8.
36. State-specific prevalence of obesity among adults\United States, 2007. MMWR 2008;57:765-768.
37. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Obesity trends: Obesity trends among adults (1985-2003). Avail-able at www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/dnpa/obesity/ trend/index.htm
38. Miller D, Livingstone V, Herbison P. Interventions for re-lieving the pain and discomfort of screening mammography. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008;CD002942.
39. Sharp PC, Michielutte R, Freimanis R, Cunningham L, Spangler J, Burnette V. Reported pain following mammog-raphy screening. Arch Intern Med 2003;163:833-836. (Pubitemid 36438055)
40. Emery C Are those suffering from obesity more sensitive to pain? Pain News 2009.