A model for elemental homology for the peristome and ambulacra in blastozoan echinoderms

Echinoderms: Durham - Proceedings of the 12th International Echinoderm Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 269-276

  Sumrall, Colin D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COVER PLATE; FLOOR PLATES; FUNCTIONAL MODEL; PHYLOGENY RECONSTRUCTION; SIDE PLATES;

BIFURCATION (MATHEMATICS); BIOLOGY;

FLOORS;

EID: 79952757737     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (38)

1. Bell, B.M. 1976a. Phylogenetic implications of ontogenetic development in the class Edrioasteroidea (Echinodermata). Journal of Paleontology 50: 1001-1019.
2. Bell, B.M. 1976b. A Study of North American Edrioasteroidea. New York State Museum, Memoir 21, 446 p.
3. Bockelie, J.F. 1979. Taxonomy, functional morphology and paleoecology of the Ordovician cystoid family Hemicosmitidae. Palaeontology 22: 363-406.
4. Bodenbender, B.E. 1995. Morphological crystallographic and stratigraphic data in cladistic analyses of blastoid phylogeny. Contributions from the Museum of Paleontology, University of Michigan 29: 201-257.
5. Bodenbender, B.E. & Fisher, D.C. 2001. Straticladistic analysis of blastoid phylogeny. Journal of Paleontology 75: 351-369.
6. Breimer, A, & Ubaghs, G. 1974. A critical comment on the classification of pelmatozoan echinoderms I and II. Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie von Wetenschappen, series 2: 398-417.
7. Brett, C.E., Frest, T.J., Sprinkle, J., & Clement, C.R. 1983. Coronoidea: a new class of blastozoan echinoderms based on taxonomic reevaluation of Stephanocrinus. Journal of Paleontology 57: 627-651.
8. Carpenter, P. H. 1884. Report on the Crinoidea - the stalked crinoids. Report on the scientific results of the voyage of the H. M. S. Challenger, Zoology 11: 1-440.
9. David, B. & Mooi, R. 1998. Major events in the evolution of echinoderms viewed by the light of embryology. In R. Mooi & M. Telford (eds) Echinoderms San Francisco: 21-28. Balkema: Rotterdam.
10. David, B & Mooi, R. 1999. Comprendre les échinoderms: la contribution du modéle extraxial-axial. Bull. Sco. géol. France 170: 91-101. (Pubitemid 29199334)
11. David, B., Lefebvre, B., Mooi, R., & Parsley, R.L. 2000. Are homalozoans echinoderms? An answer from the extraxialaxial theory. Paleobiology 26: 529-555. (Pubitemid 32180414)
12. Guensburg, T.E. & Sprinkle, J. 1994. Revised phylogeny and functional interpretation of the Edrioasteroidea based on new taxa from the Early and Middle Ordovician ofwestern Utah. Fieldiana, Geology 29: 1-43.
13. Guensburg, T.E. & Sprinkle, J. 2001. Earliest Crinoids: New evidence for the origin of the dominant Paleozoic Echinoderms. Geology 29: 131-134. (Pubitemid 34050136)
14. Guensburg, T.E. & Sprinkle, J. 2003. The oldest known crinoids (Early Ordovician, Utah) and a new crinoid plate homology system. Bulletins of American Paleontology, 364: 1-43.
15. Koverman, K.S. & Sumrall, C.D. 2002. Phylogeny of early Paleozoic echinoderms and the origin of Blastoids. Geological Society of America abstracts with programs 34: 267.
16. Lovén, S. 1874. Études sur les echinoidées. Kongelige Svenska Vetenskaps-Akademiens Handlinger New Series, 11: 1-91.
17. Mooi, R., & David, B. 1997. Skeletal Homologies of Echinoderms. In J.A. Waters & C.G. Maples (eds), Geobiology of Echinoderms. 305-335. Paleontological Society Papers, v. 3.
18. Mooi, R., & David, B. 2000. What the new model of skeletal homologies tells us about asteroid evolution. American Zoologist 40: 326-339.
19. Mooi, R., & David, B. & Marchand, D.A. 1994. Echinoderm skeletal homologies: Classical morphology meets modern phylogenetics. In B. David, A. Guille, J. Féral, & M. Roux (eds) Echinoderms Through Time. 87-95. Balkema, Rotterdam.
20. Parsley, R.L. 1982. Eumorphocystis, In J. Sprinkle (ed), Echinoderm Faunas from the Bromide Formation (Middle Ordovician) of Oklahoma. 280-288. University of Kansas Paleontological Contributions, Monograph 1.
21. Parsley, R.L. & Mintz, L.W. 1975. North American Paracrinoidea: (Ordovician: Paracrinozoa, New Echinodermata). Bulletins of American Paleontology 68: 1-115.
22. Patterson, C. 1982. Morphological characters and homology. In K.A. Joysey & A.E. Friday (eds), Systematics Association Special Volume 21: Problems of Phylogeny Reconstruction. 21-74. Academic Press, New York.
23. Paul, C.R.C. 1967. The British Silurian cystoids. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History), Geology 13: 300-355.
24. Paul, C.R.C. 1972. Cheirocystella antiqua gen. et sp. nov. from the Lower Ordovician of Western Utah, and its bearing on the evolution of the Cheirocrinidae (Rhombifera: Glyptocystitida). Brigham Young University Geological Studies 19: 15-63.
25. Regnéll, G. 1945. Non-crinoid pelmatozoa from the Paleozoic of Sweden, a taxonomic study. Meddelanden från Lunds Geologisk-Mineralogiska Institution, 108: 1-255.
26. Sevastopulo, G.D. 2005. The early ontogeny of blastoids. Geological Journal, 40:351-362. (Pubitemid 40919823)
27. Sprinkle, J. 1973. Morphology and Evolution of Blastozoan Echinoderms. Harvard University Museum of Comparative Zoology, Special Publication, 283 p.
28. Sprinkle, J. 1975. The "arms" of Caryocrinites, arhombiferan cystoid convergent on crinoids. Journal of Paleontology 49: 1062-1073.
29. Sprinkle, J. 1976. Classification and phylogeny of " pelmatozoan" echinoderms. Systematic Zoology 25: 83-91.
30. Sprinkle, J. 1982. Hybocrinus. In J. Sprinkle (ed), Echinoderm Faunas from the Bromide Formation (Middle Ordovician) of Oklahoma. 119-128. University of Kansas Paleontological Contributions, Monograph 1.
31. Sprinkle, J. and C.D. Sumrall. in press. New parablastoids from the western United States. University of Kansas Paleontological Contributions.
32. Sumrall, C.D. 1993. Thecal designs in isorophinid edrioasteroids. Lethaia 26: 289-302. (Pubitemid 24426870)
33. Sumrall, C.D. 1997. The role of fossils in the phylogenetic reconstruction of Echinodermata. In J.A. Waters & C.G. Maples (eds), Geobiology of Echinoderms. 267-288. Paleontological Society Papers, v. 3.
34. Sumrall, C.D. in press. The origin of Lovén's Law in glyptocystitoid rhombiferans and its bearing on the plate homology and the heterochronic evolution of the hemicosmitid peristomial border. In Ausich, W.I. and Webster, G. Echinoderm Paleobiology. University of Indiana Press.
35. Sumrall, C.D. & Brochu, C.A. 2003. Resolution, sampling, higher taxa and assumption in stratocladistic analysis. Journal of Paleontology 77: 189-194. (Pubitemid 36171721)
36. Sumrall, C.D. & Sprinkle, J. 1995. Peristomal bordering plates in fossil echinoderms. Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs 27:A113.
37. Sumrall, C.D. & Sprinkle, J. 1999. Early ontogeny of the glyptocystitid rhombiferan Lepadocystis moorei, In M.D.C. Carnevali & F. Bonasoro (eds) Echinoderm Research 1998. 409-414. A. A. Balkema., Rotterdam.
38. Sumrall, C.D. & Wray, G.A. 2007. Ontogeny in the fossil record: diversification of echinoderm body plans and the evolution of "aberrant" symmetry in Paleozoic echinoderms. Paleobiology. 33:149-163. (Pubitemid 46470899)