Minimising systematic error surfaces in digital elevation models using oblique convergent imagery

Photogrammetric Record

Volumn 26, Issue 133, 2011, Pages 16-31

  Wackrow, Rene ^a   Chandler, Jim H ^a  

^a LOUGHBOROUGH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Close range photogrammetry; Convergent image configuration; Digital camera; Digital elevation model; Spatial measurement

Indexed keywords

CLOSE RANGE PHOTOGRAMMETRY; CONVERGENT IMAGE CONFIGURATION; DIGITAL ELEVATION MODEL; DIGITAL SURFACES; ERROR SURFACE; IMAGING ANGLES; LABORATORY TEST; LENS DISTORTION PARAMETERS; LENS MODEL; LOUGHBOROUGH UNIVERSITY; NEW OPPORTUNITIES; PRACTICAL TESTS; SIMULATED DATA; SIMULATION PROCESS; SPATIAL DATA; SPATIAL MEASUREMENTS; SYSTEMATIC EFFECTS;

DIGITAL CAMERAS; DIGITAL INSTRUMENTS; FORESTRY; GEOMORPHOLOGY; OPTICAL INSTRUMENTS; PHOTOGRAMMETRY; SURVEYING; TESTING; VIDEO CAMERAS;

CAMERAS;

DIGITAL ELEVATION MODEL; DIGITAL IMAGE; IMAGE ANALYSIS; PHOTOGRAMMETRY; SIMULATION; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; SPATIAL DATA;

EID: 79952754815     PISSN: 0031868X     EISSN: 14779730     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1477-9730.2011.00623.x     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Chandler, J. H. and Clark, J. S., 1992. The archival photogrammetric technique: further application and development. Photogrammetric Record, 14(80): 241-247.
2. Chandler, J. H., Buffin-Bélanger, T., Rice, S., Reid, I. and Graham, D. J., 2003. The accuracy of a river bed moulding/casting system and the effectiveness of a low-cost digital camera for recording river bed fabric. Photogrammetric Record, 18(103): 209-223.
3. Chandler, J. H., Fryer, J. G. and Jack, A., 2005. Metric capabilities of low-cost digital cameras for close range surface measurement. Photogrammetric Record, 20(109): 12-26.
4. Chandler, J. H., Wackrow, R., Sun, X., Shiono, K. and Rameshwaran, P., 2008. Measuring a dynamic and flooding river surface by close range digital photogrammetry. International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 37(B8): 211-216 (on CD-ROM). [Accessed: 18th November 2010].
5. Cooper, M. A. R. and Cross, P. A., 1988. Statistical concepts and their application in photogrammetry and surveying. Photogrammetric Record, 12(71): 637-663.
6. Fraser, C. S., 1997. Digital camera self-calibration. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry & Remote Sensing, 52(4): 149-159.
7. Fraser, C. S., 2006. Evolution of network orientation procedures. International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 36(5): 114-120.
8. Fryer, J. G. and Mitchell, H. L., 1987. Radial distortion and close range stereophotogrammetry. Australian Journal of Geodesy, Photogrammetry and Surveying, 46/47: 123-138.
9. Granshaw, S. I., 1980. Bundle adjustment methods in engineering photogrammetry. Photogrammetric Record, 10(56): 181-207.
10. Grenness, M. J., Osborn, J. E. and Tyas, M. J., 2005. Stereo-photogrammetric mapping of tooth replicas incorporating texture. Photogrammetric Record, 20(110): 147-161.
11. Hothmer, J., 1958. Possibilities and limitations for elimination of distortion in aerial photographs. Photogrammetric Record, 2(12): 426-445.
12. Hothmer, J., 1959. Possibilities and limitations for elimination of distortion in aerial photographs (concluded). Photogrammetric Record, 3(13): 60-78.
13. Karara, H. M. and Abdel-Aziz, Y. I., 1974. Accuracy aspects of non-metric imageries. Photogrammetric Engineering, 40(9): 1107-1117.
14. Maas, H.-G., 1999. Ein Ansatz zur Selbstkalibrierung von Kameras mit instabiler innerer Orientierung. In Publikationen der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Photogrammetrie und Fernerkundung, Band 7 (Eds. J. Albertz & S. W. Dech ). Weinert, Berlin. 496 pages: 47-53.
15. Remondino, F. and Fraser, C. S., 2006. Digital camera calibration methods: considerations and comparisons. International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 36(5): 266-272.
16. Remondino, F. and Menna, F., 2008. Image-based surface measurement for close-range heritage documentation. International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 37(B5): 199-206 (on CD-ROM). [Accessed: 18th November 2010].
17. Remondino, F., Rizzi, A., Girardi, S., Petti, F. M. and Avanzini, M., 2010. 3D ichnology-recovering digital 3D models of dinosaur footprints. Photogrammetric Record, 25(131): 266-282.
18. Robson, S., Rova, M., Morgan, L., Heuman, J., Heathcote, M., Lees, D., Caner, H. and Mills, C. G., 2008. Measurement of transparent plastic sculptures using photogrammetry, laser scanning and touch probing for conservation purposes. International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 37(B5): 207-212 (on CD-ROM). [Accessed: 18th November 2010].
19. Stojic, M., Chandler, J. H., Ashmore, P. and Luce, J., 1998. The assessment of sediment transport rates by automated digital photogrammetry. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 64(5): 387-395.
20. Wackrow, R., 2008. Spatial measurement with consumer grade digital cameras. Ph.D. thesis, Loughborough University. 196 pages. [Accessed: 18th November 2010].
21. Wackrow, R., Chandler, J. H. and Bryan, P., 2007. Geometric consistency and stability of consumer-grade digital cameras for accurate spatial measurement. Photogrammetric Record, 22(118): 121-134.
22. Wackrow, R. and Chandler, J. H., 2008. A convergent image configuration for DEM extraction that minimises the systematic effects caused by an inaccurate lens model. Photogrammetric Record, 23(121): 6-18.
23. Wackrow, R., Chandler, J. H. and Gardner, T., 2008. Minimising systematic errors in DEMs caused by an inaccurate lens model. International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 37(B5): 1-6 (on CD-ROM). [Accessed: 18th November 2010].