Software-guided standardization of manual landmark data in medical images;Softwareunterstützte Standardisierung manueller Landmarken in medizinischen Bildern

Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Physik

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 42-51

  Prüm, Hermann ^a   Gerigk, Lars ^a   Hintze, Christian ^a   Thieke, Christian ^b   Floca, Ralf ^a  

^a GERMAN CANCER RESEARCH CENTER DKFZ   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Algorithm validation; Evaluation registration; Image registration; Landmark acquisition; Registration algorithm; Software assistant

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; COMPUTER INTERFACE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; INFORMATION PROCESSING; RELIABILITY; STANDARDIZATION;

ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; BRAIN; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; CROSS-OVER STUDIES; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; INTERDISCIPLINARY COMMUNICATION; LUNG; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SOFTWARE; SWINE; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 79952749329     PISSN: 09393889     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.zemedi.2010.06.007     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Brown L.G. A survey of image registration techniques. ACM Comput Surv 1992, 24:325-376.
2. Maintz J.B., Viergever M.A. A survey of medical image registration. Med Image Anal 1998, 2(1):1-36.
3. Zitová B., Flusser J. Image registration methods: a survey. Image Vision Comput 2003, 21:977-1000.
4. Holden M. A review of geometric transformations for nonrigid body registration. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2008, 27(1):111-128.
5. Tolxdorff T., Deserno T.M., Handels H., Meinzer H.P. Advances in medical image computing. Methods Inf Med 2009, 48(4):311-313.
6. Handels H., Ehrhardt J. Medical image computing for computer-supported diagnostics and therapy. advances and perspectives. Methods Inf Med 2009, 48(1):11-17.
7. Jannin P., Krupinski E., Warfield S. Validation in medical image processing. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2006, 25(11):1405-1409.
8. Lehmann T.M. From plastic to gold: a unified classification scheme for reference standards in medical image processing. Progress in biomedical optics and imaging 2002, 3:1819-1827.
9. West J., Fitzpatrick J.M., Wang M.Y., Dawant B.M., Maurer C.R., Kessler R.M., et al. Comparison and evaluation of retrospective intermodality brain image registration techniques. Proc SPIE 1996, 2710:332-347.
10. Krucker J., LeCarpentier G., Fowlkes J., Carson P. Rapid elastic image registration for 3-d ultrasound. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2002, 21:1384-1394.
11. Schnabel J.A., Tanner C., Castellano-Smith A.D.C., Degenhard A., Leach M.O., Hose D.R., et al. Validation of non-rigid registration using finite element methods. Informat Proc Med Imaging 2001, 2082:344-357.
12. Wang H., Dong L., O'Daniel J., Mohan R., Garden A.S., Ang K.K., et al. Validation of an accelerated 'demons' algorithm for deformable image registration in radiation therapy. Phys Med Biol 2005, 50(7):2887-2905.
13. Malsch U., Thieke C., Huber P.E., Bendl R. An enhanced block matching algorithm for fast elastic registration in adaptive radiotherapy. Phys Med Biol 2006, 51(19):4789-4806.
14. Holden M., Hill D.L., Denton E.R., Jarosz J.M., Cox T.C., Rohlfing T., et al. Voxel similarity measures for 3-d serial mr brain image registration. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2000, 19:94-102.
15. Mandava V.R., Fitzpatrick J.M., Maurer C.R., Maciunas R.J., Allen G.S. Registration of multimodal volume head images via attached markers. Proc SPIE 1992, 1652:271-282.
16. Bookstein F.L. Morphometric tools for landmark data: geometry and biology 1997, Cambridge University Press.
17. Arndt S., Rajarethinam R., Cizadlo T., O'Leary D., Downhill J., Andreasen N.C. Landmark-based registration and measurement of magnetic resonance images: A reliability study. Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging 1996, 67:145-154.
18. Castillo R., Castillo E., Guerra R., Johnson V.E., McPhail T., Garg A.K., et al. A framework for evaluation of deformable image registration spatial accuracy using large landmark point sets. Phys Med Biol 2009, 54(7):1849-1870.
19. Schreibmann E., Xing L. Image registration with auto-mapped control volumes. Med Phys 2006, 33(4):1165-1179.
20. Ryan N., Heneghan C., de Chazal P. Registration of digital retinal images using landmark correspondence by expectation maximization. Image Vision Comput 2004, 22(11):883-898.
21. Nix, O, Köhn, A, Siems, U, Hahn, H, Thieke, C. Dirolab - a software tool for visualization and evaluation of data from diagnostic imaging and radiotherapy. In: Dössel, O, Schlegel, W C., (Ed.). World Congress on Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, September 7-12, 2009, Munich, Germany; vol. 25/IV of IFMBE Proceedings Springer; 2009, p. 1333-1336.
22. Prüm, H], Floca, R. A software assistant for the manual acquisition of landmark data in medical images. In: Dössel, O, Schlegel, W C., editors. World Congress on Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, September 7-12, 2009, Munich, Germany; vol. 25/IV of IFMBE Proceedings Springer; 2009, p. 684-687.
23. Floca R.O., Dickhaus H. A flexible registration and evaluation engine (f.r.e.e.). Comput Meth Prog Bio 2007, 87:81-92.
24. Bitter I., Uitert R.V., Wolf I., Ibáñez L., Kuhnigk J.M. Comparison of four freely available frameworks for image processing and visualization that use itk. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph 2007, 13(3):483-493.
25. Chen P.P.S. The entity-relationship model - toward a unified view of data. ACM T Database Syst 1976, 1:9-36.