The role of spatial scale and soil for local adaptation in Inula hirta

Basic and Applied Ecology

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 152-160

  Raabová, Jana ^a,b   Münzbergová, Zuzana ^a,c   Fischer, Markus ^d,e  

^a CHARLES UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

^b DEPARTMENT OF ENTOMOLOGY   (Czech Republic)

^c INSTITUTE OF MATHEMATICS   (Czech Republic)

^d UNIVERSITY OF POTSDAM   (Germany)

^e UNIVERSITY OF BERN   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Dry grasslands; Fitness components; Genotype by environment; Habitat fragmentation; Home site advantage; Natural selection; Plant traits; Reciprocal transplant

Indexed keywords

INULA;

EID: 79952740167     PISSN: 14391791     EISSN: 16180089     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.baae.2011.01.001     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Antonovics J., Primack R.B. Experimental ecological genetics in Plantago. 6. The demography of seedling transplants of P. lanceolata. Journal of Ecology 1982, 70:55-75.
2. Becker U., Colling G., Dostál P., Jakobsson A., Matthies D. Local adaptation in the monocarpic perennial Carlina vulgaris at different spatial scales across Europe. Oecologia 2006, 150:506-518.
3. Becker U., Dostál P., Jorritsma-Wienk L.D., Matthies D. The spatial scale of adaptive population differentiation in a wide-spread, well-dispersed plant species. Oikos 2008, 117:1865-1873.
4. Bischoff A., Vonlanthen B., Steinger T., Müller-Schärer H. Seed provenance matters - Effects on germination of four plant species used for ecological restoration. Basic and Applied Ecology 2006, 7:347-359.
5. Bowman G., Perret C., Hoehn S., Galeuchet D.J., Fischer M. Habitat fragmentation and adaptation: A reciprocal replant-transplant experiment among 15 populations of Lychnis flos-cuculi L. Journal of Ecology 2008, 96:1056-1064.
6. Buggs R.J.A., Pannell J.R. Ecological differentiation and diploid superiority across a moving ploidy contact zone. Evolution 2007, 61:125-140.
7. Galloway L.F., Fenster C.B. Population differentiation in an annual legume: Local adaptation. Evolution 2000, 54:1173-1181.
8. Göransson P., Andersson S., Falkengren-Grerup U. Genetic adaptation to soil acidification: Experimental evidence from four grass species. Evolutionary Ecology 2009, 23:963-978.
9. Hereford J. A quantitative survey of local adaptation and fitness trade-offs. The American Naturalist 2009, 173:579-588.
10. Holub J., Procházka F. Red list of vascular plants of the Czech Republic. Preslia 2000, 72:187-230.
11. Hrouda L. Inula L. Flora of the Czech Republic 2005, 74-75. Academia, Praha. B. Slavík, J. Štěpánková (Eds.).
12. Hufford K.M., Mazer S.J., Camara M.D. Local adaptation and effects of grazing among seedlings of two native California bunchgrass species: Implications for restoration. Restoration Ecology 2008, 16:59-69.
13. Jiang J.H., Zhou C.F., An S.Q., Yang H.B., Guan B.H., Cai Y. Sediment type, population density and their combined effect greatly charge the short-time growth of two common submerged macrophytes. Ecological Engineering 2008, 34:79-90.
14. Kawecki T.J., Ebert D. Conceptual issues in local adaptation. Ecology Letters 2004, 7:1225-1241.
15. Laine A.L. Detecting local adaptation in a natural plant-pathogen metapopulation: A laboratory vs. field transplant approach. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 2007, 20:1665-1673.
16. Leimu R., Fischer M. A meta-analysis of local adaptation in plants. PLoS ONE 2008, 3:4010.
17. Macel M., Lawson C.S., Mortimer S.R., Šmilauerová M., Bischoff A., Crémieux L., et al. Climate vs. soil factors in local adaptation of two common plant species. Ecology 2007, 88:424-433.
18. Nuismer S.L., Gandon S. Moving beyond common garden and transplant designs: Insight into the causes of local adaptation in species interactions. American Naturalist 2008, 171:658-668.
19. Pánková H., Münzbergová Z., Rydlová J., Vosátka M. Differences in AM fungal root colonization between populations of perennial Aster species have genetic reasons. Oecologia 2008, 157:211-220.
20. Raabová J., Münzbergová Z., Fischer M. Ecological rather than geographic or genetic distance affects local adaptation of the rare perennial herb Aster amellus. Biological Conservation 2007, 139:348-357.
21. Raabová J., Fischer M., Münzbergová Z. Niche differentiation between diploid and hexaploid Aster amellus. Oecologia 2008, 158:463-472.
22. Raabová J., Münzbergová Z., Fischer M. Consequences of near and far between-population crosses for offspring fitness in a rare herb. Plant Biology 2009, 11:829-836.
23. Reekie E.G., Bazzaz F.A. Reproductive effort in plants 3. Effect of reproduction on vegetative activity. The American Naturalist 1987, 129:907-919.
24. Vander Mijnsbrugge K., Bischoff A., Smith B. A question of origin: Where and how to collect seed for ecological restoration. Basic and Applied Ecology 2010, 11:300-311.