Spatio-temporal evaluation matrices for geospatial data

International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 100-109

  Triglav, Joc ^a   Petrovič, Dušan ^b   Stopar, Bojan ^b  

^a Geodetska uprava Republike Slovenije   (Slovenia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LJUBLJANA   (Slovenia)

Author keywords

Communication feedback; Fitness for use; Geospatial data quality; Spatio temporal; Visualization

Indexed keywords

DATA QUALITY; MATRIX; SPATIAL DATA; SPATIOTEMPORAL ANALYSIS; VISUALIZATION;

EID: 79952740150     PISSN: 15698432     EISSN: 1872826X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jag.2010.07.002     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. Akao, Y., 1994. Development history of quality function deployment. In: Mizuno, S., Akao, Y. (Eds.), QFD, The Customer-driven Approach to Quality Planning and Development. Asian Productivity Organization, Tokyo, pp. 339-351.
2. Bauerlein, M., 2008. The Dumbest Generation-How the Digital Age Stupefies Young Americans and Jeopardizes Our Future (Or, Don't Trust Anyone Under 30). Penguin Group, New York, 272 p.
3. Bédard, Y., 1987. Uncertainties in land information systems databases. In: Eighth International Symposium on Computer-Assisted Cartography, Baltimore, MD.
4. Bédard, Y., Devillers, R., Gervais, M., Jeansoulin, R., 2004. Towards multidimensional user manuals for geospatial datasets: legal issues and their considerations into the design of a technological solution. In: Proc. of the 3rd International Symposium on Spatial Data Quality (ISSDQ), Bruck an der Leitha, Austria, April 15-17, vol. 28b GeoInfo Series, pp. 183-195.
5. Belussi, A., Combi, C., Pozzani, G., 2008. Towards a formal framework for spatiotemporal granularities. In: Proc. of the 2008 15th International Symposium on Temporal Representation and Reasoning, Montreal, pp. 49-53.
6. Bittner, T., Smith, B., 2003. In: Duckham, M., Goodchild, M.F., Worboys, M.F. (Eds.), A Theory of Granular Partitions. Foundations of Geographic Information Science. Taylor & Francis Books, London, pp. 117-151.
7. Boin, A.T., Hunter, G.J., 2008. What communicates quality to the spatial data consumer? In: Stein, A., Shi, W., Bijker, W. (Eds.), Quality Aspects of Spatial Data Mining. CRC Press, New York, pp. 123-132.
8. Bruns, A., 2008. The future is user-led: the path towards widespread produsage. FiberCulture Journal (11), available online at: http://eprints.qut.edu.au/12902/1/12902.pdf (accessed 28.04.10).
9. Burstein, F., Holsapple, C.W. (Eds.), 2008. Handbook on Decision Support Systems, vols. 1 and 2. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 854 and 800 pp.
10. Couclelis, H., 2003. The certainty of uncertainty: GIS and the limits of geographic knowledge. Transactions in GIS 7 (2), 165-175.
11. Camossi, E., Bertolotto, M., Bertino, E., Guerrini, G., 2003. Issues on modeling spatial granularities. In: Proc. of the COSIT'03 Workshop on Fundamental Issues in Spatial and Geographic Ontology, Ittingen.
12. Cheng, C., Lu, F., 2004. Building a multi-granularity based spatial database. In: Proc. 12thInt.Conf.onGeoinformatics2004-GeospatialInformationResearch,Bridg-ing the Pacific and Atlantic University of Gävle, Sweden, June 7-9, 2004.
13. Craglia, M., Goodchild, M.F., Annoni, A., Camera, G., Gould, M., Kuhn, W., Mark, D., Masser, I., Maguire, D., Liang, S., Parsons, E., 2008. Next-generation Digital Earth: A position paper from the Vespucci initiative for the advancement of geographic information science. International Journal of Spatial Data Infrastructures Research 3, 146-167, available online at: http://ijsdir.jrc.ec.europa.eu/index.php/ijsdir/article/viewFile/119/99 (accessed 28.04.10).
14. Dassonville, L., Vauglin, F., Jakobsson, A., Luzet, C., 2002. Quality management, data quality and users. In: Shi, W., Fisher, P.F., Goodchild, M.F. (Eds.), Metadata for Geographical Information, Spatial Data Quality. Taylor & Francis, London, pp. 202-215.
15. Devillers, R., Beard, K., 2006. Communication and use of spatial data quality informationin GIS. In: Fundamentals of Spatial Data Quality. ISTE Publishing, London, pp. 237-253.
16. Devillers, R., Bédard, Y., Jeansoulin, R., 2005. Multidimensional management of geospatial data quality information for its dynamic use within geographical information systems. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing (PE&RS) 71 (2), 205-215.
17. Devillers, R., Bédard, Y., Jeansoulin, R., Moulin, B., 2007. Towards spatial data quality information analysis tools for experts assessing the fitness for use of spatial data. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 21, 261-282.
18. Drecki, I., 2002. In: Shi, W., Fisher, P.F., Goodchild, M.F. (Eds.), Visualisation of Uncertainty in Geographic Data, Spatial Data Quality. Taylor & Francis, London, pp. 140-159.
19. Eckerson, W., 2002. Data Warehousing Special Report: Data quality and the bottom line. Data Warehousing Institute, available online at: https://www.tdwi.org/research/display.aspx?ID=6589 (accessed 24.07.09).
20. FET, 2009. Future and Emerging Technologies Programme, available online at: http://cordis.europa.eu/fp7/ict/programme/feten.html (accessed 02.11.09).
21. FP7, 2009. Seventh Framework Programme, available online at: http://cordis.europa.eu/fp7/(accessed 02.11.09).
22. Frank, A.U., 1998. Building a geospatial data framework-finding the best available data. In: Goodchild, M.F., Jeansoulin, R. (Eds.), Data Quality in Geographic Information: From Error to Uncertainty. Editions Hermès, Paris, 192 pp.
23. Frank, A.U., Grum, E., Vasseur, B., 2004. Procedure to select the best dataset for a task. In: Proc. of the Third International Conference on Geographic Information Science, GIScience 2004, Adelphi, USA, pp. 81-93.
24. GEO, 2009. GEO 2009-2011 Work Plan, available online at: http://www.earthobservations.org/documents/work%20plan/geowp0911rev1090113.pdf (accessed 30.10.09).
25. GEOSS, 2009. Strategic Guidance for Current and Potential Contributors to GEOSS, available online at: http://www.earthobservations.org/documents/portal/25Strategic%20Guidance%20Document.pdf (accessed30.10.09).
26. Gervais, M., 2006. On the importance of external data quality in civil law. In: Devillers, R., Jeansoulin, R. (Eds.), Fundamentals of Spatial Data Quality. ISTE, London, pp. 283-300.
27. Gervais, M., Bédard, Y., Devillers, R., Larrivée, S., Chrisman, N., Lévesque, J., 2006. Auditing spatial data suitability for specific applications: professional and technological issues.In:2006EuroSDR,EuroGeographics&theAGILEWorkingGroup Quality Assurance in Geographic Data Production, Marne-La-Vallée, France, February 14, 2006.
28. Goodchild, M.F., 2006. Foreword. In: Devillers, R., Jeansoulin, R. (Eds.), Fundamentals of Spatial Data Quality. ISTE, London, pp. 13-16.
29. Goodchild, M.F., 2007. Citizens as voluntary sensors: spatial data infrastructure in the world of Web 2.0. International Journal of Spatial Data Infrastructures Research 2 (437), 24-32, available online at: http://ijsdir.jrc.ec.europa.eu/index.php/ijsdir/article/view/28/22 (accessed 25.08.09).
30. Grum, E., Vasseur, B., 2004. How to select the best dataset for a task? In: Proc. of 3rd International Symposium on Spatial Data Quality (ISSDQ'04), Bruck an der Leitha, Austria, pp. 197-206.
31. Harvey, F., 1998. Quality needs more than standards. In: Goodchild, M.F., Jeansoulin, R. (Eds.), Data Quality in Geographic Information-From Error to Uncertainty. Editions Hermès, 192 pp.
32. Henriksson, R.M., Kauppinnen, T., 2007.Anontology driven approach for spatial data quality evaluation. In: Proc. of the 5th International Symposium, Dissemination and Fitness for Use, ITC, Enschede, The Netherlands, June 13-15, 2007.
33. Hope, S., Hunter, G.J., 2007a. Testing the effects of positional uncertainty on spatial decision making. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 21 (6), 645-665.
34. Hope, S., Hunter, G.J., 2007b. Testing the effects of thematic uncertainty on spatial decision making. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 199-214.
35. Hunter, G.,DeBruin, S., Bregt, A., 2007. Improving the usability of spatial information products and services. In: The European Information Society: Leading the Way in Geoinformation, Lecture NotesinGeoinformation and Cartography. SpringerVerlag, Berlin, Germany, pp. 405-418.
36. Hunter, G.J., Virrantaus, K., Bregt, A.K., Heuvelink, G.B.M., De Bruin, S., 2009. In: Navratil, G. (Ed.), Spatial Data Quality: Problems and Prospects. In Research TrendsinGeographic Information Science(Lecture NotesinGeoinformation and Cartography Series). Springer-Verlag, pp. 101-122.
37. INSPIRE Annexes, 2008. INSPIRE Directive-Definition of Annex Themes and Scope (D 2.3 Version 3). Drafting Team "Data Specifications", available online at: http://inspire.jrc.ec.europa.eu/reports/ImplementingRules/DataSpecifications/D2.3DefinitionofAnnexThemesandscopev3.0.pdf (accessed 20.04.10), 172 pp.
38. ISO, 2000. ISO 9004:2000 Quality Management Systems-Guidelines for Performance Improvements. International Organization for Standardization.
39. ISO, 2002. ISO 19108:2002 Geographic Information-Temporal Schema. International Organization for Standardization.
40. ISO, 2003a. ISO 19107:2003 Geographic Information-Spatial Schema. International Organization for Standardization.
41. ISO, 2003b. ISO 19112:2003 Geographic Information-Spatial Referencing by Geographic Identifiers. International Organization for Standardization.
42. ISO, 2005a. ISO 9000:2005 Quality Management Systems-Fundamentals and Vocabulary. International Organization for Standardization.
43. ISO, 2005b. ISO 19113:2005 Geographic Information-Quality Principles. International Organization for Standardization.
44. ISO, 2005c. ISO 19114:2005 Geographic Information-Quality Evaluation Procedures. International Organization for Standardization.
45. ISO, 2005d.ISO19115:2005Geographic Information-Metadata. International Organization for Standardization.
46. ISO, 2006. ISO/TS 19138:2006 Geographic Information-Data Quality Measures. International Organization for Standardization.
47. ISO, 2007a. ISO 19111:2007 Geographic Information-Spatial Referencing by Coordinates. International Organization for Standardization.
48. ISO, 2007b. ISO 19131:2007 Geographic Information-Data Product Specifications. International Organization for Standardization.
49. ISO, 2007c. ISO/TS 19139:2007 Geographic Information-Metadata-XML Schema Implementation. International Organization for Standardization.
50. ISO, 2008. ISO 9001:2008 Quality Management Systems-Requirements. International Organization for Standardization.
51. ISO, 2009a. ISO 19111-2:2009 Geographic Information-Spatial Referencing by Coordinates-Part 2: Extension for Parametric Values. International Organization for Standardization.
52. ISO, 2009b. ISO 19115-2:2009 Geographic Information-Metadata-Part 2: Extensions for Imagery and Gridded Data. International Organization for Standardization.
53. ITC, 2008. STDIV Annual Report, available online at: http://www.itc.nl/PDF/Research/annualreports/stdivannrep2008.pdf (accessed 02.11.09).
54. Jakobsson, A., 2006. On the Future of Topographic Base Information Management in Finland and Europe. Doctoral Dissertation. Department of Surveying, Helsinki University of Technology, Espoo, Finland, 180 pp.
55. Knightsbridge, 2006. Top 10 Trends in Business Intelligence for 2006. Data Warehousing Institute, available online at: http://www.b-eye-network.com/view/2717 (accessed 24.07.09).
56. Kraak, M.-J., 2006. Geovisualization and time-new opportunities for the spacetime cube. Geographic Visualization across the Social Sciences. Manchester, UK, available online at: http://www.itc.nl/personal/kraak/publications/2006-manchester-geovis-handout.pdf (accessed 06.11.09).
57. Lemmens, M., 2009. Three Decades of Progress. Endpoint, vol. 11, no. 11. GIM International, p. 57.
58. Levesque, M.-A., Bédard, Y., Gervais, M., Devillers, R., 2007. Towards managing the risks of data misuse for spatial datacubes. In: Proc. of the 5th International Symposium, Modelling Qualities In Space and Time, ITC, Enschede, The Netherlands, June 13-15, 2007.
59. Li, X., Kraak, M.-J., 2005. New viewson multivariable spatio-temporal data: the space time cube expanded. In: Proc. of International Symposium on Spatio-temporal Modeling, Spatial Reasoning, Analysis, Data Mining and Data Fusion. ISPRS WG II/1 Cognition and Modeling of Space and Time, Beijing, China, available online at: http://isprs-wgii-1.casm.ac.cn/ProceedingsSTM05.html (accessed 06.11.09).
60. McLaren, R., 2009. The role of urban sensing in managing megacities. In: Proc. of the FIG Commission 3 Workshop: Spatial Information for Sustainable Management of Urban Areas, Mainz, Germany, February 2009, available online at: http://www.fig.net/commission3/mainz2009/programme2.html (accessed 25.08.09).
61. Mell, P., Grance, T., 2009. The NIST Definition of Cloud Computing. Version 15. National Institute of Standards and Technology, Information Technology Laboratory, USA, available online at: http://csrc.nist.gov/groups/SNS/cloud-computing/cloud-def-v15.doc (accessed 06.11.09).
62. NASA, 2009. EOSDIS Glossary, available online at: https://wist.echo.nasa.gov//v0ims/glossary.of.terms.html (accessed 22.07.09).
63. OGC, 2009. The Open Geospatial Consortium Data Quality Working Group, avail-ableonline at:http://www.opengeospatial.org/projects/groups/dqwg (accessed 25.07.09).
64. O'Reilly, T., 2005. What is Web 2.0: Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software, O'Reilly September 30, 2005, available online at: http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.html (accessed 01.09.09).
65. OS, 2009. Ordnance Survey and the Control of Data Quality, available online at: http://www.ordnancesurvey.co.uk/oswebsite/products/osmastermap/information/technical/docs/d04886.pdf (accessed 25.07.09).
66. Pick, J. (Ed.), 2005. Geographic Information Systems in Business. Idea Group Publishing, Hershey, PA, 384 pp.
67. Plag, H.-P., Pearlman, M. (Eds.), 2009. Meeting the Requirements of a Global Society on a Changing Planet in 2020. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 332 pp.
68. Radwan, M.M., Onchaga, R., Morales, J., 2001. A Structural Approach to the Management and Optimization of Geoinformation Processes. Official Publication No. 41, European Organization for Experimental Photogrammetric Research. Bundesamt für Kartographie und Geodäsie, Frankfurt am Main, 174 pp.
69. Smith, B., Brogaard, B., 2002. Quantum mereotopology. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence 35 (1-2), 153-175.
70. Stein, A., Van Oort, P., 2006. The Impact of Positional Computation of Cost Functions. Fundamentals of Spatial Data Quality. ISTE Publishing, London, pp. 107-122.
71. Triglav, J., 2009. Geolocation and Time: An Evolution of the Millennial Pair. GeoIn-formatics, vol. 12, no. 7, available online at: http://fluidbook.microdesign.nl/geoinformatics/07-2009/#44 and http://www.geoinformatics.com/blog/in-the-spotlight/geolocation-and-time (accessed 06.11.09), pp. 44-49.
72. Turner, A., 2007. Neogeography-Towards a Definition, High Earth Orbit website, December 6, 2007, available online at: http://highearthorbit.com/neogeography-towards-a-definition (accessed 20.09.09).
73. Ulwick, A.W., 2002. Turn customer input into innovation. Harvard Business Review (January), 92-97.
74. VisMaster, 2009. Visual Analytics-Mastering the Information Age, available online at: http://www.vismaster.eu/home (accessed 02.11.09).
75. Walford, N., 2002. Geographical Data, Characteristics and Sources. John Wiley & Sons, England, 274 pp.