Not-so-old dogs and not-so-new tricks: Is there a middle ground for ED ultrasound?

Academic Emergency Medicine

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 311-312

  Moore, Chris ^a  

^a YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DIAGNOSTIC ERROR; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; ECHOGRAPHY; EMERGENCY CARE; EMERGENCY MEDICINE; EMERGENCY PATIENT; EMERGENCY PHYSICIAN; EMERGENCY WARD; HEALTH CARE COST; HUMAN; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; MEDICAL LIABILITY; MEDICAL PRACTICE; NOTE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; POINT OF CARE TESTING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; RESIDENCY EDUCATION; SELF MONITORING; SYNCOPE; UTERINE TUBE LIGATION;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; EMERGENCY MEDICINE; HUMANS; INTERNSHIP AND RESIDENCY; MEDICINE; POINT-OF-CARE SYSTEMS; ULTRASONOGRAPHY;

EID: 79952728411     PISSN: 10696563     EISSN: 15532712     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01018.x     Document Type: Note

References (2)

1. Wrenn K, Slovis C. Misguided residency applicant questions? Acad Emerg Med. 1999; 6:981-3.
2. Moore CL, Molina AA, Lin H. Ultrasonography in community emergency departments in the United States: access to ultrasonography performed by consultants and status of emergency physician-performed ultrasonography. Ann Emerg Med. 2006; 47:147-53. (Pubitemid 43121083)