Concentrate on per via naturales: Spare cesarean section and save the abdomen

Expert Review of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 1, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 3-5

  Sheth, shirish S ^a  

^a Sir Hurkisondas Nurrotumdas Hospital & Research Centre   (India)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79952708529     PISSN: 17474108     EISSN: 17474116     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1586/17474108.1.1.3     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Villar J, Valladares E, Wojdyla D et al. Caesarean delivery rates and pregnancy outcomes: the 2005 WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health in Latin America. Lancet 367, 1819–1829 (2006).
2. Sheth SS, Goyal MV, Shah N. Uterocervical displacement following adhesions after Caesarean section. J. Gynecol. Surg. 13, 143–147 (1997).
3. Pare E, Quinones J, Macones G. Vaginal birth after caesarean section versus elective repeat Caesarean section: assessment of maternal downstream health outcomes. Br. J. Gynecol. 113, 75–85 (2006).
4. Kirschbaum TH. Editorial comment on – vaginal birth after cesarean and uterine rupture rates in California. In: Year Book of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women’s Health. Mishell DR, Kirschbaum TH, Miller DS (Eds). Mosby Inc., MO, USA (2006).
5. Lydon-Rochelle M, Holt VL, Easterling TR et al. Risk of uterine rupture during labor among women with a prior cesarean delivery. N. Engl. J. Med. 345, 3–8 (2001).
6. Donald I. Practical Obstetrics Problems. Lloyd Luke, Medical Book Ltd, London, UK (1972).
7. Impey L, MacQuillan K, Robson M. Epidural analgesia need not increase operative delivery rates. In: Year Book of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women’s Health. Mishell DR, Kirschbaum TH, Miller DS (Eds). Mosby Inc., MO, USA (2001).
8. Aronson MP. Imperatives. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 192, 1483–1487 (2005).
9. Lieberman E, Ernst E, Rooks J, Stapleton S, Flamm B. Results of the national study of vaginal birth after cesarean in birth centers. Obstet. Gynecol. 104, 933–942 (2004).
10. ACOG Vaginal birth after previous cesarean delivery. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 54. Obstet. Gynecol. 104, 203–212 (2004).
11. What is the right number of Caesarean sections? Lancet 349, 815 (1997).
12. Harer WB. A guest editorial: quo vadis cesarean delivery? Obstet. Gynecol. Survey 57, 61–64 (2002).
13. Sheth SS, Malpani AN. Inappropriate use of new technology: impact on women’s health. Int. J. Gynecol. Obstet. 58, 159–165 (1997).