A survey of entrepreneurial risk in U.S. wetland and stream compensatory mitigation markets

Environmental Science and Policy

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 301-314

  BenDor, Todd K ^a   Riggsbee, J Adam ^b  

^a The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill   (United States)

^b RiverBank Ecosystems   (United States)

Author keywords

Aquatic restoration' environmental restoration risk; Compensatory mitigation; Mitigation banking; Water resources; Wetland and stream mitigation

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONFLICT OF INTEREST; DECISION MAKING; ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION; ENTREPRENEURIAL MITIGATION BANKING; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; GOVERNMENT REGULATION; HUMAN; INDUSTRY; INVESTMENT; MARKET; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROFIT; RISK MANAGEMENT; STREAM (RIVER); UNITED STATES; WETLAND;

EID: 79952705823     PISSN: 14629011     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2010.12.011     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Asquith N.M., Vargasa M.T., Wunder S. Selling two environmental services: in-kind payments for bird habitat and watershed protection in Los Negros, Bolivia. Ecological Economics 2008, 65:675-684.
2. BenDor T., Brozovic N. Determinants of spatial and temporal patterns in compensatory wetland mitigation. Environmental Management 2007, 40:349-364.
3. BenDor T., Brozovic N., Pallathucheril V.G. Assessing the socioeconomic impacts of wetland mitigation in the Chicago region. Journal of the American Planning Association 2007, 73(3):263-282.
4. BenDor T., Doyle M.W. Planning for ecosystem service markets. Journal of the American Planning Association 2010, 76(1):59-72.
5. BenDor T., Sholtes J., Doyle M.W. Landscape characteristics of a stream and wetland mitigation banking program. Ecological Applications 2009, 19(8):2078-2092.
6. Cook C., Heath F., Thompson R.L. A meta-analysis of response rates in web- or Internet-based surveys. Educational and Psychological Measurement 2000, 60:821-836.
7. Corps, 2006, Draft Environmental Assessment, Finding of No Significant Impact, and Regulatory Analysis for Proposed Compensatory Mitigation Regulation, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Directorate of Civil Works, Washington, DC.
8. Corps, EPA, 1990. Memorandum of Agreement Between the Environmental Protection Agency and the Department of the Army Concerning the Determination of Mitigation Under the Clean Water Act Section 404(b)(1) Guidelines.
9. Corps, EPA, 1995. Federal guidance for the establishment, use and operation of mitigation banks, 60 Fed. Reg. 228, 58605-58614.
10. Corps, EPA, 2000. Federal Guidance on the Use of In-Lieu-Fee Arrangements for Compensatory Mitigation under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act.
11. Corps, EPA, 2008, Compensatory Mitigation for Losses of Aquatic Resources; Final Rule, in: Federal Register, 73 Fed. Reg. 70 19593-19705.
12. Dahl, T.E., 1990, Wetlands Losses in the United States, 1780s to 1980s, U.S Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, D.C.
13. Dillman D.A., Smyth J.D., Christian L.M. Internet, Mail, and Mixed-mode Surveys: The Tailored Design Method 2008, Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.
14. Dunne T., Leopold L.B. Water in Environmental Planning 1978, W.H. Freeman and Company, San Francisco.
15. ELI Mitigation of Impacts to Fish and Wildlife Habitat: Estimating Costs and Identifying Opportunities 2007, Environmental Law Institute, Washington, DC.
16. Fricker S., Galesic M., Tourangeau R., Yan T. An Experimental Comparison of Web and Telephone Surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly 2005, 69(3):370-392.
17. Gaffney-Smith M. Legislative and Regulatory Update. Proceedings of the National Mitigation and Ecosystem Banking Conference 2010.
18. GAO Wetlands Protection: Corps of Engineers Does Not Have an Effective Oversight Approach to Ensure That Compensatory Mitigation Is Occurring (GAO-05-898) 2005, U.S. General Accounting Office, Washington, DC.
19. Gardner R.C. Recondsidering In-lieu Fees: A Modest Proposal 2007, Ecosystem Marketplace, Washington, DC.
20. Hobbs R.J., Harris J.A. Restoration ecology: repairing the earth's ecosystems in the new millennium. Restoration Ecology 2001, 9(2):239-246.
21. Hough P., Robertson M. Mitigation under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act: where it comes from, what it means. Wetlands Ecology and Management 2009, 17(1):15-33.
22. Lewin S. Credit availability and use in the Wake of the Federal Rule. Proceedings of the National Mitigation and Ecosystem Banking Conference 2010.
23. Madsen B., Carroll N., Moore Brands K. State of Biodiversity Markets Report: Offset and Compensation Programs Worldwide 2010, Ecosystem Marketplace, Washington, DC.
24. Nolles K. Lessons on the Design and Implementation of Environmental Markets from the Financial markets (SEELab Working Paper: WP20060707) 2006, SIRCA Experimental Economics Laboratory, Sydney, Australia.
25. NRC Compensating for Wetland Losses Under the Clean Water Act 2001, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
26. OECD Market and Government Failures in Environmental Management: Wetlands and Forests 1992, Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris, France.
27. Palmer M.A., Filoso S. Restoration of Ecosystem Services for Environmental Markets. Science 2009, 325(5940):575-576.
28. Patton M.Q. Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods 2001, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA. 3rd edition.
29. Patton M.Q. Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods 2002, Sage Publications, Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA.
30. Riggsbee A., Doyle M.W. Environmental Markets: The Power of Regulation. Science 2009, 326(5956):1061.
31. Robertson M. The work of wetland credit markets: two cases in entrepreneurial wetland banking. Wetlands Ecology and Management 2009, 17:35-51.
32. Robertson M.M. Emerging ecosystem service markets: trends in a decade of entrepreneurial wetland banking. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 2006, 4(6):297-302.
33. Robertson M.M., Hayden N. Evaluation of a market in wetland credits: entrepreneurial wetland banking in Chicago. Conservation Biology 2008, 22(3):636-646.
34. Ruhl J.B., Glen A., Hartman D. A practical guide to habitat conservation banking law and policy. American Bar Assoication: Natural Resources and the Environment 2005, 1(20):27-32.
35. Strand M. Do the mitigation regulations satisfy the law? Wait and see. Stetson Law Review 2009, 38(2):273-310.
36. Urban D. Is the Corps Complying with the Rules? (NMBA Working Paper) 2010, National Mitigation Banking Association, Baltimore, MD.
37. USDOT Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU) 2005, U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.
38. Womble, P., Doyle, M.W. Setting Geographic Service Areas for Compensatory Mitigation Banking, National Wetlands Newsletter, in press.