Continuous decision MTE influence diagrams

Proceedings of the 3rd European Workshop on Probabilistic Graphical Models, PGM 2006

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 67-74

  Cobb, Barry R ^a  

^a VIRGINIA MILITARY INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DECISION PROBLEMS; DECISION RULES; DECISION VARIABLES; DISCRETE DECISION VARIABLES; EXPECTED UTILITY; INFLUENCE DIAGRAM; MIXTURES OF TRUNCATED EXPONENTIALS; PROBABILITY THEORY; UTILITY FUNCTIONS;

DECISION MAKING; EXPERT SYSTEMS;

DECISION THEORY;

EID: 79952700463     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. Cobb, B.R. (2006), "Refining decision rules in influence diagrams, " Working Paper, Virginia ilitary Institute. Available for download at: www.vmi.edu/media/ecbu/cobb/CONTID.pdf
2. Cobb, B.R. and RR Shenoy (2004), "Hybrid influence diagrams using mixtures of truncated exponentials, " in M. Chickering and J. Halpern (eds.) Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, 20, 85-93.
3. Cobb, B.R. and P.P. Shenoy (2005), "Hybrid Bayesian networks with linear deterministic vari ables, " in F. Bacchus and T. Jaakkola (eds.), Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, 21, 136-144.
4. Cobb, B.R. and P.P. Shenoy (2006a), "Inference in hybrid Bayesian networks using mixtures of truncated exponentials, International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 41(3), 257-286.
5. Cobb, B.R., Shenoy, P.P. and R. Rumi (2006), "Approximating probability density functions in hybrid Bayesian networks with mixtures of truncated exponentials, " Statistics and Computing 16(3), 293-308.
6. Howard, R.A. and J.E. Matheson (1984), "Influence diagrams, " in R.A. Howard and J.E. Matheson (eds.), Readings on the Principles and Applications of Decision Analysis, 2, 719-762, Strategic ecisions Group, enlo Park, CA.
7. Adsen, A.L. and F. Jensen (2005), "Solving linear-quadratic conditional Gaussian influence diagrams, International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 38(3), 263-282.
8. Adsen, A.L. and F.V. Jensen (1999), "Lazy evaluation of symmetric Bayesian decision problems, in K.B. Laskey and H. Prade (eds.), Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, 15, 382-390.
9. Olmsted, S.M. (1983), "On representing and solving decision problems, " Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Engineering-Economic Systems, Stanford Univer sity, Stanford, CA.
10. Poland, W.B. and R.D. Shachter (1993), "Mixtures of Gaussians and minimum relative entropy techniques for modeling continuous uncertainties, " in D. Heckerman and E.H. Mamdani (eds.), Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, 9, 183-190.
11. Rumi, R. and A. Salmerón (2005), "Penniless propagation with mixtures of truncated exponentials, in L. Godo (ed.), Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning under Uncertainty, Lecture otes in Artificial Intelligence, 3571, 39-50.
12. Shachter, R.D. (1986), "Evaluating influence diagrams, " Operations Research, 34(6), 871-882.
13. Shachter, R.D. and CR. Kenley (1989), "Gaussian influence diagrams, " Management cience, 35(5), 527-550.
14. Shenoy, P.P. (1993), "A new method for represent ing and solving Bayesian decision problems, " in DJ. Hand (ed.), Artificial Intelligence Frontiers in Statistics: AI and Statistics III, Chapman and Hall, London, 119-138.