Exploring radio frequency identification technology's application in international distribution centers and adoption rate forecasting

Technological Forecasting and Social Change

Volumn 78, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 661-673

  Cheng, Yung Hsiang ^a   Yeh, Yi Ju ^b  

^a NATIONAL CHENG KUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL KAOHSIUNG UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Adoption rate; Logit model; Radio frequency identification technology; Structure equation modeling; Technology acceptance model; User acceptance

Indexed keywords

ADOPTION RATE; LOGIT MODEL; RADIO FREQUENCY IDENTIFICATION TECHNOLOGY; STRUCTURE EQUATION MODELING; TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL; USER ACCEPTANCE;

COST ACCOUNTING; CRYPTOGRAPHY; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; RADIO WAVES; SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT; SUPPLY CHAINS; TECHNOLOGY; WAREHOUSES;

RADIO FREQUENCY IDENTIFICATION (RFID);

EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS; LOGIT ANALYSIS; STAKEHOLDER; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT; TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION;

TAIWAN;

EID: 79952699241     PISSN: 00401625     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2010.10.003     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Auto-ID Center, Technology Guide, Auto-ID Center, 2002. Available at: http://www.autoidcenter.org.
2. Prater E., Frazier G.V., Reyes P.M. Future impacts of RFID on e-supply chains in grocery retailing, supply chain management. Int. J. 2005, 10(2):134-142.
3. Smith A.D. Exploring radio frequency identification technology and its impact on business systems. Inf. Manage. Comput. Secur. 2005, 13(1):16-28.
4. Roberts C.M. Radio frequency identification (RFID). Comput. Secur. 2006, 25(1):18-26.
5. Lu C.S. Market segment evaluation and international distribution centers. Transp. Res. E 2003, 39(1):49-60.
6. Lu C.S. An evaluation of logistics services' requirements of international distribution centers in Taiwan. Trans. J. 2004, 43(4):53-66.
7. Wang K.Y. Development of logistic hub in Taiwan. Marit. Q. 2005, 14(1):43-62.
8. Baker P. An exploratory framework of the role of inventory and warehousing in international supply chain. Int. J. Logistics Manage. 2007, 18(1):54-80.
9. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, Facing the Challenge of Integrated Transport Services, UNCTAD/SDD/MT7, 1995,New York: United Nations.
10. Cheng Y.H., Tsai Y.L. Factors influencing shippers to use multiple country consolidation services in international distribution centers. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2009, 122(1):78-88.
11. Wu N.C., Nywtrom M.A., Lin T.R., Yu H.C. Challenges global RFID adoption. Technovation 2006, 26(12):1317-1323.
12. Chao C.C., Yang J.M., Jen W.Y. Determining technology trends and forecasts of RFID by a historical review and bibliometric analysis from 1991 to 2005. Technovation 2007, 27(5):268-279.
13. Dew N., Read S. The more we get together: coordinating network externality product introduction in the RFID industry. Technovation 2007, 27(10):569-581.
14. Hu P.J.H., Clark T.H.K., Ma W.W. Examining technology acceptance by school teachers: a longitudinal study. Inf. Manage. 2003, 41(2):227-241.
15. Igberia M., Zinatelli N., Cragg P., Cavaye A.L.M. Personal computing acceptance factors in small firms: a structural equation model. MIS Q. 1997, 21(3):279-305.
16. Agarwal R., Prasad J. Are individual differences germane to the acceptance of new information technologies?. Decis. Sci. 1999, 30(2):361-391.
17. Chau P.Y.K., Hu P.J.H. Information technology acceptance by individual professionals: a model comparison approach. Decis. Sci. 2001, 32(4):699-719.
18. Davis F.D. Perceived usefulness perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 1989, 13(3):319-340.
19. Brown I., Russell J. Radio frequency identification technology: an exploratory study on adoption in the South African retail sector. Int. J. Inf. Manage. 2007, 27(4):250-265.
20. Leimeister S., Leimeister J.M., Knebel U., Krcmar H. A cross-national comparison of perceived strategic importance of RFID for CIOs in Germany and Italy. Int. J. Inf. Manage. 2009, 29(1):37-47.
21. Schmitt P., Thiesse F., Fleisch E. Adoption and diffusion of RFID technology in the automotive industry. European Conference on Information Systems 2007, ST Gallen.
22. Wamba S.F., Chatfield A.T. A contingency model for creating value from RFID supply chain network projects in logistics and manufacturing environments. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 2009, 18(6):615-636.
23. Wamba S.F., Keating B., Coltman T., Coltman K. RFID adoption issues: analysis of organizational benefits and risks. Wollongong - School of Information Systems & Technology (SISAT) 2009, Wollongong University.
24. Lee M.S. An empirical study about RFID acceptance - focus on the employees in Korea. Int. J. Bus. Econ. Finance Manage. Sci. 2009, 1(2):78-87.
25. Wamba S.F., Lefebvre L.A., Bendavid Y., Lefebvre É. Exploring the impact of RFID technology and the EPC network on mobile B2B eCommerce: a case study in the retail industry. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2008, 112(2):614-629.
26. Angeles R. RFID technologies: supply-chain applications and implementation issues. Inf. Syst. Manage. 2005, 22(1):51-65.
27. Curtin J., Kauffman R.J., Riggins F.J. Making the most out of RFID technology: a research agenda for the study of the adoption, usage and impact of RFID. Inf. Technol. Manage. 2007, 8(2):87-110.
28. Kambil A., Brooks J.D. Auto-ID across the value chain: from dramatic potential to greater efficiency and profit June 1 2002, Auto-ID Center - www.autoidcenter.org.
29. Delen D., Hardgrave B.C., Sharda R. RFID for better supply-chain management through enhancement information visibility. Prod. Oper. Manage. 2007, 16(5):613-624.
30. Fleisch E., Tellkamp C. Inventory in accuracy and supply chain performance: a simulation study of a retail supply chain. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2005, 95(3):373-385.
31. F.D. Davis, A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end user information systems: Theory and results. Doctoral Dissertation (1986) Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
32. Fishbein M., Ajzen I. Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: an introduction to theory and research 1975, Addison-Wesley, MA.
33. Lederer A.L., Maupin D.J., Sena M.P., Zhuang Y. The technology acceptance model and the World Wide Web. Decis. Support Syst. 2000, 29(3):269-282.
34. Shin H.P. An empirical study on predicting user acceptance of e-shopping on the Web. Inf. Manage. 2004, 41(3):351-368.
35. Lu C.S., Lai K.H., Cheng T.C.E. Application of structural equation modeling to evaluate the intention of shippers to use intention services in liner shipping. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2007, 180(2):845-867.
36. Lucas H.C., Spitler V.K. Technology use and performance: a field study of broker workstations. Decis. Sci. 1999, 30(2):291-311.
37. Olson J.R., Boyer K.K. Factors influencing the utilization of Internet purchasing in small organizations. J. Oper. Manage. 2003, l(21):225-245.
38. Venkatesh V., Davis F.D. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Manage. Sci. 2000, 46(2):186-204.
39. Hair J., Anderson R., Tatham R., Black W. Multivariate Data Analysis with Reading 2006, Prentice Hall International, Upper Saddle River, NJ. 6th ed.
40. Louviere J., Meyer R., Stetzer F., Beavers L. Theory, methodology and findings in mode choice behaviour. Working Paper 1973, 11. The Institute of Urban and Regional Research, University of Iowa.
41. Miller J.T., Ogden J.R., Latshaw C.A. Using trade-off analysis to determine value-price sensitivity of custom calling features. Am. Bus. Rev. January 1998, 1:8-13.
42. Akiva B.M., Lerman S. Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand 1985, The MIT Press, MA, Cambridge.
43. Jones J.M., Zufryden F.S. Adding exploratory variables to a consumer purchase behavior model: an exploratory study. J. Marking Res. 1980, 17(3):323-334.
44. Punj G.N., Staelin R. The choice process for graduate business schools. J. Mark. Res. 1978, 15(4):588-598.
45. Churchill G.A. Marketing Research: Methodology Foundation 1991, The Dryden Press, New York. 5th ed.
46. Johnson J.C., Wood D.F. Contemporary logistics 1996, Prentice-Hall International, USA.
47. Port logistics. Compendium for model course 5.02, London 1991, International maritime organization.
48. Armstrong S.J., Overton T.S. Estimating no response bias in mail survey. J. Mark. Res. 1997, 14(3):396-402.
49. Phillips L.W., Bagozzi R.P. On Measuring the Organizational Properties of Distribution Channels: Methodological Issues in the Use of Key Informants. Research in Marketing 1986, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT. J. Sheth (Ed.).
50. Koufteros X.A. Testing a model of pull production: a paradigm for manufacturing research using structural equation modeling. J. Oper. Manage. 1999, 17(4):467-488.
51. Gefen D. It is not enough to be responsive: the role of cooperative intentions in MRP II adoption. Data Base Adv. Inf. Syst. 2000, 31(2):65-79.
52. Joeskog K.G., Sorbom D. LISREL 8: User's Reference Guide 1996, Scientific Software, Chicago, IL.