The politics of stem cell policy: Ballot initiative in missouri

Social Work in Public Health

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 158-175

  Patel, Kant ^a  

^a MISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

ballot initiative; biotechnology; Catholics; Claire McCaskill; Evangelical Christians; Jim Talent; Policy; politics; referendum; stem cell

Indexed keywords

BIOTECHNOLOGY; CATHOLICISM; CONSTITUTIONAL REFORM; HEALTH POLICY; REFERENDUM; SPATIOTEMPORAL ANALYSIS;

ARTICLE; BIOTECHNOLOGY; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HUMAN; LEGAL ASPECT; POLITICS; PUBLIC OPINION; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RELIGION; STEM CELL TRANSPLANTATION; UNITED STATES;

BIOTECHNOLOGY; CHRISTIANITY; HEALTH POLICY; HUMANS; MISSOURI; POLITICS; PUBLIC OPINION; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; STEM CELL TRANSPLANTATION;

MISSOURI; UNITED STATES;

EID: 79952687781     PISSN: 19371918     EISSN: 1937190X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/19371918.2011.524505     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Betting on the people: All Missourians can reap the benefits of cutting-edge research [Editorial]. (2005, October 13). St. Louis Post Dispatch, p. B8.
2. Burke, D., Cho, R. U., & Roshangar, K. (2006, November 28). Scorecard: Who won and who lost on election day. Christian Century, 123(24), 13-15.
3. Bush vetoes stem cell research bill. (2006). Issues in Science & Technology, 23(1), 21-22.
4. California will fund stem cell research. (2004, November 3). St. Louis Post Dispatch, p. A14.
5. Cauchon, D. (2004, December 15). Divisive issues on state agendas. USA Today, p. 03a.
6. Danforth, J. (2005, April 3). It's an extension of a religious movement. Kansas City Star (Missouri), p. B7.
7. Franck, M. (2005a, December 16). Court allows two church groups to join stem cell research lawsuit. St. Louis Post Dispatch, p. C7.
8. Franck, M. (2005b, October 12). Missouri may be first to resolve stem cell issue with vote. St. Louis Post Dispatch, p. B4.
9. Franck, M. (2005c, October 12). Voters may get stem cell issue: Group launches drive for a constitutional amendment protecting nearly all forms of the research in Missouri. St. Louis Post Dispatch, p. A1.
10. Franck, M. (2006a, October 29). Stem cell debate heats up over wording: The language used in the measure has some people saying it is sure to end up in the courts. St. Louis Post Dispatch, p. B1.
11. Franck, M. (2006b, October 17). Stem cell fight shatters spending records $30 million battle. St. Louis Post Dispatch, p. A1.
12. Franck, M. (2006c, January 20). Stem cell initiative's wording is cleared. St. Louis Post Dispatch, p. B1.
13. Franck, M. (2006d, August 7). Women's risk is stem cell issue. St. Louis Post Dispatch, p. B1.
14. Gerson, M. (2006, November 13). A new social gospel. Newsweek, 40-43.
15. Gertzen, J. (2005, April 20). Push is on to end stem cell skirmishes. Kansas City Star (Missouri), p. C1.
16. Gertzen, J. (2006, October 17). States go own way on science. Kansas City Star (Missouri)
17. Gertzen, J., & Wagar, K. (2006, November 8). Stem-cell efforts energized. Kansas City Star (Missouri), p. 1.
18. Helling, D. (2006, October 26). Stars out on stem cell issue. Kansas City Star (Missouri), p. 1.
19. Hoover, T. (2006, September 15). Stem-cell dollar power listed, but critics dispute outlook. Kansas City Star (Missouri), p. B2.
20. Hurlbut, W. (2006). Science, religion, and the politics of stem cells. Social Research, 73(3), 819-834.
21. Jonsson, G. (2006, October 25). Celebrities make their pitch. St. Louis Post Dispatch, p. A1.
22. Karash, J. A. (2004, October 4). KC couple puts money behind stem-cell push. Kansas City Star (Missouri), p. D5.
23. Keefe, B. (2004, November 1). Stem-cell bond issue could boost California biotech role. Kansas City Star (Missouri), p. B6.
24. Keyes and friends are way off base. (2006, September 13). Kansas City Star (Missouri), p. B1.
25. Kraske, S. (2006a, May 3). Opposition to stem-cell ballot consistent, Talent says. Kansas City Star (Missouri), p. B8.
26. Kraske, S. (2006b, February 11). Talent changes stem-cell stance. Kansas City Star (Missouri), p. A1.
27. Kraske, S. (2006c, May 2). Talent opposes stem-cell measure. Kansas City Star (Missouri), p. A1.
28. Kurtz, H. (2001, July 16). Politics, science collide. Washington Post.
29. Levin, Y. (2006, November 15). The wedge issue that wasn't. National Review Online.
30. Lieb, D. A. (2005, November 29). Foes of embryonic cell research file suit to block ballot petition. St. Louis Post Dispatch, p. B5.
31. Lieb, D. A. (2006, October 28). Stem cell issue roils Missouri race. Associated Press.
32. Mannies, J. (2005d, April 25). Political decisions may hinge on stem cell research issue. St. Louis Post Dispatch, p. B2.
33. Mannies, J. (2005b, November 19). Coalition's ad blitz promotes stem cell research. St. Louis Post Dispatch, p. 11.
34. Mannies, J. (2006a, October 6). Actor stumps for research, McCaskill. St. Louis Post Dispatch, p. C4.
35. Mannies, J. (2006b, August 29). Burke: Stem cell backers spread untruths. St. Louis Post Dispatch, p. C1.
36. Mannies, J. (2006c, February 28). Campaign against proposal kicks off. St. Louis Post Dispatch, p. B1.
37. Mannies, J. (2006d, October 5). Fox visit shows how stem cells are tangled up with Senate race. St. Louis Post Dispatch, p. B3.
38. Mannies, J. (2006e, October 16). Missouri initiative splitting the GOP. St. Louis Post Dispatch, p. E1.
39. Mannies, J. (2006f, May 8). Social conservatives welcome Talent's stem cell stance. St. Louis Post Dispatch, p. A1.
40. Mannies, J., & Jonsson, G. (2006, May 2). Talent opposes stem cell initiative. St. Louis Post Dispatch, p. B1.
41. Mannies, J., & Townsend, T. (2006, July 30). Stem cell showdown: A 3-month holy war? St. Louis Post Dispatch, p. B1.
42. Margolies, D. (2004, April 22). Biomed bill draws praise, concern. Kansas City Star (Missouri), p. C1.
43. McCaskill for Missouri [Editorial]. (2006, October 22). St. Louis Post Dispatch, p. C2.
44. Melcer, R. (2004, December 1). Missouri biotech group works to gather its strength. St. Louis Post Dispatch, p. C01.
45. Melcer, R. (2006, September 15). Stem-cell proponents cite money. St. Louis Post Dispatch, p. B1.
46. Miller, L. (2006, November 13). An evangelical identity crisis. Newsweek, 30-37.
47. Missouri Secretary of State Office. (2005). 2006 ballot measure constitutional amendment 2: Stem cell initiative. Jefferson City, MO: Missouri State Government.
48. Missouri to keep the stem-cell ballot as it is. (2006, May 13). Kansas City Star (Missouri), p. B2.
49. O'Connor, P. (2006, November 12). Our political pulse. St. Louis Post Dispatch, p. A1.
50. O'Neil, T. (2006, January). McCaskill backs stem cell ballot issue. St. Louis Post Dispatch, p. C4.
51. Patel, K., & Rushefsky, M. (2005). President Bush and stem cell policy: The politics of policy making. White House Studies, 5(1), 37-52.
52. Rudoren, J. (2006, July 25). Stem cell work gets states' aid after Bush veto. New York Times, p. 1.
53. Shelly, B. (2004, March 15). Defend KC's hope to be biomedical hub. Kansas City Star (Missouri), p. B4.
54. Shesgreen, D. (2006a, July 23). Talent outstrips McCaskill in scramble for funds. St. Louis Post Dispatch, p. A14.
55. Shesgreen, D. (2006b, February 11). Talent takes new tack on stem cell. St. Louis Post Dispatch, p. A2.
56. Somers, T. (2006, December 19). Stem cell research no dream for California. San Diego Union-Tribune, p. A-1.
57. Stearns, M. (2006a, October 18). GOP rift brews on stem-cell vote. Kansas City Star (Missouri), p. A1.
58. Stearns, M. (2006b, February 26). Stem-cell stance divides GOP. Kansas City Star (Missouri), p. A15.
59. Stem cell politics [Editorial] (2001, October). Nature Genetics, 29(2), 101-102.
60. Stem cell research: A vexing issue for states. (2006, September 15). Chronicle of Higher Education, 53(4), 27.
61. Stem cell, wage hike measures get on the ballot. (2006, August 9). St. Louis Post Dispatch, p. B7.
62. Townsend, T. (2005, November 25). Bishops target stem cell petition. St. Louis Post Dispatch, p. A1.
63. Vergano, D. (2004, April 21). States dive into stem cell debates. USA Today, p. 01D.
64. Wagar, K. (2005a, October 21). Group drops support for Blunt. Kansas City Star (Missouri), p. B1.
65. Wagar, K. (2005b, November 29). Lawsuit seeks to keep stem cell off ballot. Kansas City Star (Missouri), p. B1.
66. Wagar, K. (2005c, October 16). Volatile stem cell debate ahead. Kansas City Star (Missouri), p. B1.
67. Wagar, K. (2006a, November 5). Catholic group backs stem-cell ballot issue. Kansas City Star (Missouri), p. 1.
68. Wagar, K. (2006b, January 20). Judge approves ballot language for stem-cell vote. Kansas City Star (Missouri), p. 1.
69. Wagar, K. (2006c, March 29). Stem-cell ballot issue challenge is rejected. Kansas City Star (Missouri), p. B3.
70. Wagar, K. (2006d, November 28). Stem-cell issues remains a focus. Kansas City Star (Missouri), p. 5.
71. Wagar, K. (2006e, July 11). Stem cell research foes mobilizing. Kansas City Star (Missouri), p. B1.
72. Wagar, K., & Gertzen, J. (2005, October 12). Group launches stem cell initiative. Kansas City Star (Missouri), p. A1.
73. Wagman, J. (2006, November 3). Cardinal's shortstop joins debate on Amendment 2. St. Louis Post Dispatch, p. C8.