Some like it hot: Medical student views on choosing the emotional level of a simulation

Medical Education

Volumn 45, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 354-361

  Lefroy, Janet ^a   Brosnan, Caragh ^b   Creavin, Sam ^a  

^a KEELE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United Kingdom)

^b KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; EMOTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MALE; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL STUDENT; METHODOLOGY; PHYSICAL EXAMINATION; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUESTIONNAIRE; STANDARD; TEACHING; UNITED KINGDOM;

CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMMUNICATION; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, UNDERGRADUATE; EMOTIONS; FEMALE; FOCUS GROUPS; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; MALE; PATIENT SIMULATION; PHYSICAL EXAMINATION; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; QUESTIONNAIRES; STUDENTS, MEDICAL;

EID: 79952667068     PISSN: 03080110     EISSN: 13652923     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03881.x     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Knowles MS. The Adult Learner - A Neglected Species, 4th edn. Houston, TX: Gulf Publishing 1990;85-7.
2. Kernis MH. Measuring self-esteem in context: the importance of stability of self-esteem in psychological functioning. J Pers 2005;73:1569-1605.
3. Elloit A, Dweck C, eds. Handbook of Competence and Motivation. New York, NY: Guilford Press 2005;85-104, 122-40.
4. Knights JA, Kennedy BJ. Medical school selection: screening for dysfunctional tendencies. Med Educ 2006;40:1058-64.
5. Lievens F, Coetsier P, De Fruyt F, De Maeseneer J. Medical students' personality characteristics and academic performance: a five-factor model perspective. Med Educ 2002;36:1050-56.
6. Williams GC, Deci EL. The importance of supporting autonomy in medical education. Ann Intern Med 1998;4:303-8.
7. Cobb P, Bowers J. Cognitive and situated learning perspectives in theory and practice. Educ Res 1999;28:4-15.
8. Schunk DH. Learning Theories: An Educational Perspective, 5th edn. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education 2009.
9. Vygotsky L. Thought and Language. Boston, MA: MIT Press 1986;187.
10. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York, NY: Freeman 1997;81-114.
11. Aspegren K. BEME Guide No. 2: Teaching and learning communication skills in medicine - a review with quality grading of articles. Med Teach 1999;21:563-70.
12. Kneebone R. Simulation in surgical training: educational issues and practical implications. Med Educ 2003;37:267-77.
13. Kurtz S, Silverman J, Draper J. Teaching and Learning Communication Skills in Medicine, 2nd edn. Oxford: Radcliffe Publishing 2005;88-103.
14. Strauss A, Corbin J. Grounded theory methodology: an overview. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, eds. Handbook of Qualitative Research. London: Sage Publications 1994;1-18.
15. Pope C, Ziebland S, Mays N. Analysing qualitative data. In: Mays N, Pope C, eds. Qualitative Research in Health Care, 3rd edn. London: BMJ Books 2006;63-80.
16. Merton R, Fiske M, Kendal P. The Focused Interview. Glencoe, IL: Free Press 1956;141-53.
17. Barbour RS. Making sense of focus groups. Med Educ 2005;39:742-50.
18. Wood D, Bruner J, Ross G. The role of tutoring in problem-solving. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 1976;17(2):89-100.